OK I have settled on what camera I will be getting to get back into film but have a question about lenses. I will be doing mostly nature and sports/action photography. The camera I am looking at I can get in one of three packages for the amount I have budgeted for this. Which one will be better in terms of convenience and quality? Also any good sites to check out that cover the basics, like when to use what lenses, What Fstop and Aperture settings to use/when, ISO speeds and all that good stuff. Although the camera I am getting can be set for auto everything I will use manual everything mostly to really learn the in's and out's.
Package #1
35mm SLR Camera Body
28-80 f4.0-5.6 AF Lens
80-200 f4.5-5.6 AF Lens
Package #2
35mm SLR Camera Body
28-105 f4.0-5.6 AF Lens
Package #3
35mm SLR Camera Body
28-105 f4.0-5.6 AF Lens
100-300 F4.5-5.6 AF Lens
Now the Camera that I am looking at is the Minolta Maxxum 5 and all lenses are Minolta Lenses, I checked out the Nikon N65 and Canon Rebels and best bang for the buck is the Minolta. Plus I like how the camera feels and operates better. Another option would be a Sigma 28-300mm Compact Zoom Lens. Should I consider this for the ultimate convenience? It is a little more pricey but having 28-300mm in one lens would be nice as long as I do not sacrafice alot of quality.
Package #1
35mm SLR Camera Body
28-80 f4.0-5.6 AF Lens
80-200 f4.5-5.6 AF Lens
Package #2
35mm SLR Camera Body
28-105 f4.0-5.6 AF Lens
Package #3
35mm SLR Camera Body
28-105 f4.0-5.6 AF Lens
100-300 F4.5-5.6 AF Lens
Now the Camera that I am looking at is the Minolta Maxxum 5 and all lenses are Minolta Lenses, I checked out the Nikon N65 and Canon Rebels and best bang for the buck is the Minolta. Plus I like how the camera feels and operates better. Another option would be a Sigma 28-300mm Compact Zoom Lens. Should I consider this for the ultimate convenience? It is a little more pricey but having 28-300mm in one lens would be nice as long as I do not sacrafice alot of quality.