Originally posted by: notfred
god I love perl![]()
Originally posted by: ROTC1983
Originally posted by: notfred
god I love perl![]()
What is Perl...I have heard of it before, but I don't know what it is...Enlighten me![]()
Originally posted by: Ameesh
![]()
god i hate perl coders
Originally posted by: The Dancing Peacock
Originally posted by: ROTC1983
Originally posted by: notfred
god I love perl![]()
What is Perl...I have heard of it before, but I don't know what it is...Enlighten me![]()
perl
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
$filename =~ s/^.*[\/\\]([^\/\\]+)$/$1/;
filename = re.sub(r'^(.*)[/\]([^/\]+)$', r'\1', filename)
python > perl![]()
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
$filename =~ s/^.*[\/\\]([^\/\\]+)$/$1/;
filename = re.sub(r'^(.*)[/\]([^/\]+)$', r'\1', filename)
python > perl![]()
I fail to see how a different syntax makes it better![]()
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
$filename =~ s/^.*[\/\\]([^\/\\]+)$/$1/;
filename = re.sub(r'^(.*)[/\]([^/\]+)$', r'\1', filename)
python > perl![]()
I fail to see how a different syntax makes it better![]()
that wasnt an example of how its better, was just a translation for the heck of it.
i'm just spewing hot air anyways, i never learned much perl, but from what i did learn i didnt like it. sloppy and fidgety
now python...python is perfect
actually i've been learning it the past week or two and it is very nice...
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
$filename =~ s/^.*[\/\\]([^\/\\]+)$/$1/;
filename = re.sub(r'^(.*)[/\]([^/\]+)$', r'\1', filename)
python > perl![]()
I fail to see how a different syntax makes it better![]()
that wasnt an example of how its better, was just a translation for the heck of it.
i'm just spewing hot air anyways, i never learned much perl, but from what i did learn i didnt like it. sloppy and fidgety
now python...python is perfect
actually i've been learning it the past week or two and it is very nice...
Perl is faster![]()
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
$filename =~ s/^.*[\/\\]([^\/\\]+)$/$1/;
filename = re.sub(r'^(.*)[/\]([^/\]+)$', r'\1', filename)
python > perl![]()
I fail to see how a different syntax makes it better![]()
that wasnt an example of how its better, was just a translation for the heck of it.
i'm just spewing hot air anyways, i never learned much perl, but from what i did learn i didnt like it. sloppy and fidgety
now python...python is perfect
actually i've been learning it the past week or two and it is very nice...
Perl is faster![]()
faster to a migrane![]()
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
$filename =~ s/^.*[\/\\]([^\/\\]+)$/$1/;
filename = re.sub(r'^(.*)[/\]([^/\]+)$', r'\1', filename)
python > perl![]()
I fail to see how a different syntax makes it better![]()
that wasnt an example of how its better, was just a translation for the heck of it.
i'm just spewing hot air anyways, i never learned much perl, but from what i did learn i didnt like it. sloppy and fidgety
now python...python is perfect
actually i've been learning it the past week or two and it is very nice...
Perl is faster![]()
faster to a migrane![]()
It's only confusing to those that don't understand it![]()
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
s/confusing/ugly![]()
Originally posted by: schizoid
I had to program an interpretor for the Lamda calculus (functionally the same as turing machines...i.e. the other half of the church-turing thesis) in ML.
For those of you who don't know, ML is the programming language for annoying academic types who love axiomatic semantics and who don't get laid enough.
But none of these languages hold a candle to Prolog.
And language that talks back to you just rules.
No.
That would always crack me up. I'd be working on a Prolog assignment, and it would say "No" and I'd just start screaming at the computer, like, "Yes! HOW DARE YOU TALK TO ME LIKE THAT!"
Ok, someone do this DOE fellowship for me. Thanks.
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
Originally posted by: schizoid
I had to program an interpretor for the Lamda calculus (functionally the same as turing machines...i.e. the other half of the church-turing thesis) in ML.
For those of you who don't know, ML is the programming language for annoying academic types who love axiomatic semantics and who don't get laid enough.
But none of these languages hold a candle to Prolog.
And language that talks back to you just rules.
No.
That would always crack me up. I'd be working on a Prolog assignment, and it would say "No" and I'd just start screaming at the computer, like, "Yes! HOW DARE YOU TALK TO ME LIKE THAT!"
Ok, someone do this DOE fellowship for me. Thanks.
haha, wow man, you are in too deep...
although there is some appeal to "No." vs. "Unhandled exception argument 6 on line 32: variable undefined blah blah"
Originally posted by: notfred
I hate curry. It's yellow and tastes bad. Like urine.
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
I still type "echo poop" at unix prompts because I think it's funny.
<------------
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
I still type "echo poop" at unix prompts because I think it's funny.
<------------