Feel guilty for not ever donating to wiki?

[OVerLoRDI]

I donate a small amount every year. I get much more than ~$10 worth of joy per year with Wikipedia

 

[WelshBloke]

Did you actually read any of that drivel?

Sadly I believe its intended to be serious however I'm not sure why you would say its petty or shallow to wish it were otherwise.

Errr, it's my point that I was calling shallow and petty. I was relieved that it wasn't my flag in the corner even though, obviously, wilful ignorance isn't limited to the people flying that flag.

 

[MagnusTheBrewer]

If you know something later and greater it would be nice if you could share it.

Not latest perhaps but, definitely greatest. They're called libraries. For some unfathomable reason, convenience has not only assumed the highest priority in everything from knowledge to food, it has become the only factor used to determine value. The perspective, enthusiastic support of the masses and, worst, acceptance of people who know better, all SUCK. It depresses the hell out of those of us who want to embrace the advantages of new technology instead of facing new and faster ways to waste time, energy and, resources.

 

[Captante]

Errr, it's my point that I was calling shallow and petty. I was relieved that it wasn't my flag in the corner even though, obviously, wilful ignorance isn't limited to the people flying that flag.

Gotcha ... misunderstood.

 

[lxskllr]

Not latest perhaps but, definitely greatest. They're called libraries. For some unfathomable reason, convenience has not only assumed the highest priority in everything from knowledge to food, it has become the only factor used to determine value. The perspective, enthusiastic support of the masses and, worst, acceptance of people who know better, all SUCK. It depresses the hell out of those of us who want to embrace the advantages of new technology instead of facing new and faster ways to waste time, energy and, resources.

Yea, I can see how a tiny curated, and sometimes censored collection of books can be better than all the books. No, wait, I actually can't...

 

[WelshBloke]

Not latest perhaps but, definitely greatest. They're called libraries. For some unfathomable reason, convenience has not only assumed the highest priority in everything from knowledge to food, it has become the only factor used to determine value. The perspective, enthusiastic support of the masses and, worst, acceptance of people who know better, all SUCK. It depresses the hell out of those of us who want to embrace the advantages of new technology instead of facing new and faster ways to waste time, energy and, resources.

OK. I'm assuming that from now on you'll be supporting all the points you make with references to journals and scans of said articles?

Gotcha ... misunderstood.

My bad, I tend not to put enough effort into making my points.

Apparently I need to get them peer reviewed first.

 

[MagnusTheBrewer]

Yea, I can see how a tiny curated, and sometimes censored collection of books can be better than all the books. No, wait, I actually can't...

That's just it and, the crux of my issue with wiki, it isn't "all the books." It isn't even a significant portion of "all the books" and, nowhere does it give any indication of it's limits.

 

[lxskllr]

My bad, I tend not to put enough effort into making my points.

Apparently I need to get them peer reviewed first.

Done. You were peer reviewed, and corrections were issued. If you had published a book, we'd have to wait for the initial run to sell, then publish a revision later; maybe some time next year if people loved WelshBloke books. Of course, if it didn't sell well, everyone would just have to stick with the erroneous data, not to mention the people that paid $19.95, and have a book that's wrong forever :^D

 

[WelshBloke]

That's just it and, the crux of my issue with wiki, it isn't "all the books." It isn't even a significant portion of "all the books" and, nowhere does it give any indication of it's limits.

It isn't, and has never been, "all the books". Its an encyclopedia, and probably the best one available, that happens to be free, and readily available to most of the population.

 

[lxskllr]

That's just it and, the crux of my issue with wiki, it isn't "all the books." It isn't even a significant portion of "all the books" and, nowhere does it give any indication of it's limits.

That's like saying people open Britannica and expect to find full novels by Stephen King inside. Wikipedia is an encylopedia. Period. They make no claims otherwise, and people of normal to slightly below normal intelligence don't expect anything else. You're conflating the full internet with one site, mixing/matching throughout the discussion. What are we talking about here?

 

[Arcadio]

I donate every year. I use Wikipedia all the time and it's a valuable tool, especially for educators like myself.

 

[MagnusTheBrewer]

That's like saying people open Britannica and expect to find full novels by Stephen King inside. Wikipedia is an encylopedia. Period. They make no claims otherwise, and people of normal to slightly below normal intelligence don't expect anything else. You're conflating the full internet with one site, mixing/matching throughout the discussion. What are we talking about here?

You are the one who made the comparison. I'm sorry you attention span is unable to encompass all the points I've made and, you're apparently unwilling to scroll up (remember what I said about convenience)? I had hopes that someone might be willing to discuss how the technology could be better used but, I'll let you fanbois enjoy your shiny new toys.

 

[lxskllr]

You are the one who made the comparison. I'm sorry you attention span is unable to encompass all the points I've made and, you're apparently unwilling to scroll up (remember what I said about convenience)? I had hopes that someone might be willing to discuss how the technology could be better used but, I'll let you fanbois enjoy your shiny new toys.

Seriously dude?

Books by their very nature are viewed as limited texts. You pick them up and hold them in your hands in their entirety. The internet on the other hand "appears" to be limitless when it most definitely is not. You also seem to think "facts" exists independently of their context which is naive at best. I agree that there are many positive things about putting knowledge online. However, my somewhat cynical viewpoint honed by decades of interaction with poorly educated 'youts' makes me wary of technology that exacerbates the problem at the speed of light.

I know exactly what I've posted in this thread. Convenience is an extremely high priority when disseminating knowledge; one of the highest in fact. If you have to trek to Tibet, and give gifts to some old fucker on top of a mountain, it doesn't much matter how much knowledge is in his head. Most people don't have the resources to do that.

You talk in circles, and make no substantive claims; same as the religion threads...

 

[OverVolt]

No, wiki is pretty useless.

Its the way they cite references, they must be free references from the internet, open source and all that. In 2014 the good information is increasingly behind pay-walls and the quality of information on wiki has fallen in lock-step.

I find stuff like the actual journals (ie nature.com, science direct etc.) and oddly enough TED talks (if you know who you are looking for) as infinitely better sources of good information. I'd rather cite quotes out of a TED video than some university of shanghai paper translated into broken English linked at the bottom of a wiki.

 

[dighn]

No, wiki is pretty useless.

Its the way they cite references, they must be free references from the internet, open source and all that.

...

it's not ideal for detailed and in depth information, but it's still good for quickly getting a handle on something, e.g. the general function of a product (without having to wade through all the marketing BS on the official site), or the approximate population of some random city.

i try to donate a bit every year but not this year. it's kind of on my todo list.

 

[zanemoseley]

It's a wonderful site with endless information compiled much better than your random web site. I give them $3 which 99% of people won't notice missing from their account. I'd drop $100 in a heartbeat if they were in danger of shutting down.

 

[ponyo]

Nope. If Wiki shuts down, something else will take its place.

 

[FelixDeCat]

Wikipedia is a lie.

 

[Howard]

Wiki is the single greatest unwitting proponent of idiocracy the world has ever seen.

I see that you are going to continue posting complaints about Wikipedia until someone takes the bait.

 

[midwestfisherman]

No!

 

[FelixDeCat]

I see that you are going to continue posting complaints about Wikipedia until someone takes the bait.

Im going to correct the wiki entry for Putin to portray him for the mad dictator of Moscow that he is, bent on rebuilding the USSR. Oh wait, I cant. Its full of lies.

 

[FelixDeCat]

No!

Yes!

 

[Howard]

Im going to correct the wiki entry for Putin to portray him for the mad dictator of Moscow that he is, bent on rebuilding the USSR. Oh wait, I cant. Its full of lies. [citation needed]

Fixed.

 

[rsbennett00]

Add me to the people that don't believe in wikipedia. It's almost all heresy.

 

[PlanetJosh]

Ah man I didn't realize Wiki donations takes Paypal. And no wiki registration is required. Paypal is easy to me, it's just 2 lines to fill out and a couple clicks or so compared to a lot more lines of info for credit cards. So I donated $50 a few minutes ago. One less guilty person I guess.