Feds Off the Hook for Wrecked $750,000 Ferrari

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JTsyo

Lifer
Nov 18, 2007
11,809
944
126
Was this the scene from The Rock? that was a Lamborghini though.

I would think the government would be responsible for private vehicles in their care. The car wasn't even impounded for an owner's crime. That law seems bogus and a conflict of interest. The government giving itself immunity.
 
Last edited:

AstroManLuca

Lifer
Jun 24, 2004
15,628
5
81
Idiots thought they could beat on a Ferrari like they can a vtec...


yo



quick somebody make a gif

spongebob-tollbooth.gif
 

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
Ah the F50, seeing that car takes me back to my days of playing Need 4 Speed 2 for hours on end.

Screw that judge and the agent who crashed it.
 

Patranus

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2007
9,280
0
0
If the car isn't in police custody (agent/prosecutor took it for a joy ride) then would the car have not only not have been in place custody but the agent/prosecutor should be brought up on grand theft auto?
 

Josh

Lifer
Mar 20, 2000
10,917
0
0
Was this the scene from The Rock? that was a Lamborghini though.

I would think the government would be responsible for private vehicles in their care. The car wasn't even impounded for an owner's crime. That law seems bogus and a conflict of interest. The government giving itself immunity.

In The Rock the car was a Ferrari...the guy even says a somewhat famous quote "Hey man you just fucked up your Ferrari..." Nicholas Cage responds, "It wasn't mine.."
 
Last edited:

Josh

Lifer
Mar 20, 2000
10,917
0
0
I would like to point out that the party getting shafted here is the insurance company.

IIRC from what I've heard of this over the last few years:

- Car was stolen
- Insurance co paid out for it
- Car was recovered
- Insurance co now wants the car since they paid for it
- FBI wrecks it
- Insurance co sues FBI

So the owner is probably long since over this, & is on to an Enzo or wherever one goes from an F50.

Viper GTS

Well the F50 is a collector item at this point since they aren't produced anymore. It's going to cost him a decent amount to get one and depending on how much he was insured for he probably may have to come out of pocket somewhat.
 

Lifted

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2004
5,748
2
0
So what you're tell us is that the insurance company didn't have insurance on the car.

L
O
L
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,461
996
126
You can't have things both ways. If a company is responsible for the actions of it's agents(affirmed through thousands of court cases), then the government is responsible for the actions of it's agents.

Unless there is a law that forbids it. There are plenty of laws that prevent lawsuits against government actors.

And there probably was negative consequences for the agent and maybe the federal prosecutor.
 
Last edited:

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,452
2
0
UTTER BS..... just like SWAT and other teams that accidentally bust down the wrong door don't have to reimburse the homeowner..... or if they tear up your house "looking for teh evil drugs" there is nothing to be done for the homeowner, regardless of the results of the search.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
57,926
8,188
126
Unless there is a law that forbids it. There are plenty of laws that prevent lawsuits against government actors.

And there probably was negative consequences for the agent and maybe the federal prosecutor.

That doesn't make it right. Law should be based of truth, not what's convenient for the ruling class. That's tyranny.

Personally, I'm fine with absolving the government/corporations of responsibility. Every individual is responsible for their own actions. It needs to be treated equally though. No one gets a free ride.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,745
4,563
136
If you're blowing 3 qtrs of a million dollars on just your car, the government isn't the only one "taking you for a ride".
 

brblx

Diamond Member
Mar 23, 2009
5,499
2
0
If you're blowing 3 qtrs of a million dollars on just your car, the government isn't the only one "taking you for a ride".

it's an F50. it's not exactly losing a lot of value (unless you wreck it).

hell of a lot better investment than buying a $750,000 house.
 

blinblue

Senior member
Jul 7, 2006
889
0
76
OK, so how do you lose control if you aren't driving it recklessly. So since they were driving it recklessly it hardly seems that they were doing it on official business (this car is supposed to be evidence after all), so go get those bozos fired for destroying evidence and for destroying a perfectly nice car!