Feds Jailed Gun Owner for Making Politically Incorrect Facebook Posts

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,142
5,089
136
Be careful what you "like" on social media while black.
You may go to prison for 5 months

Black activist jailed for his Facebook posts speaks out about secret FBI surveillance

Three years ago, a gun-loving Texan attended a protest against public employees who violate their constituents’ constitutional rights. He then made multiple politically incorrect Facebook posts. In response to these actions, the FBI raided his house in the middle of the night and jailed him for five months (without giving him the opportunity to post bail), while they tried to prosecute him on terrorism charges.

The terrorism case fell apart. Eventually, the Feds resigned themselves to busting the man for illegally owning a firearm; a judge found that charge to be bogus. He was freed; but while the government had kept him locked up for the crime of expressing an affection for guns — and opinions the deep state didn’t like — he lost his car, job, home, and the opportunity to witness the first year of his newborn’s life.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...tity-extremists-prosecuted-fbi-gun-owner.html

https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/rakem-balogun-black-activist-case-dismissed/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ew-black-identity-extremists-fbi-surveillance


 
Feb 4, 2009
35,464
16,960
136
Admittedly I just skimmed the links, I’d recommend holding judgement until the posts are known and what other posts exist.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
Admittedly I just skimmed the links, I’d recommend holding judgement until the posts are known and what other posts exist.

He was jailed for 5 months without being allowed to post bail, judge threw out the one BS gun charge they tried to put on him which was not a reason to deny him bail and because of it his life is fucked. Most peoples lives would be wild and truly fucked if they were thrown in jail for 5 months on bogus charges. But here is what they argued:

Investigators began monitoring Balogun, whose legal name is Christopher Daniels, after he participated in an Austin, Texas, rally in March 2015 protesting against law enforcement, special agent Aaron Keighley testified in court.

The FBI, Keighley said, learned of the protest from a video on Infowars, a far-right site run by the commentator Alex Jones, known for spreading false news and conspiracy theories.

The reference to Infowars stunned Balogun: “They’re using a conspiracy theorist video as a reason to justify their tyranny? That is a big insult.”

Keighley made no mention of Balogun’s specific actions at the rally, but noted the marchers’ anti-police statements, such as “oink oink bang bang” and “the only good pig is a pig that’s dead”. The agent also mentioned Balogun’s Facebook posts calling a murder suspect in a police officer’s death a “hero” and expressing “solidarity” with the man who killed officers in Texas when he posted: “They deserve what they got.”

Keighley, however, later admitted the FBI had no evidence of Balogun making any specific threats about harming police.

At the time of his Facebook posts, Balogun said he was angry and “venting” about the high-profile cases of police killing innocent black men and women in America, including Alton Sterling and Philando Castile. He was particularly disgusted with the way the media and law enforcement officials portrayed the killings as justified and said that when he wrote those posts “I just mimicked their reactions to our killings.”

In a letter Balogun wrote to the Guardian from jail, he said he felt he had been “abducted” by the FBI, a “prisoner of war on free speech and the right to bear arms”. Authorities were targeting him for promoting black-led community groups and fighting “government abuse”, he wrote, adding he was never a threat to anyone: “Violence is the method of our oppressor, our method is hard work, love and unity.”

Edit: source
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,023
2,872
136
If what is written at face value is true, then I can't even see probable cause for the search of his home, much less arrest, or remand(!?), and lack of speedy trial. I'm guessing they had some kind of actual evidence that he was an imminent terror threat that either didn't materialize into a good case or was somehow later discredited. Otherwise, how many constitutional rights were violated here? History tells me the likely problem is incomplete reporting, although it's plenty possible he was still discriminated against even if the feds had much more than what was presented.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IJTSSG

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,747
15,763
136
If what is written at face value is true, then I can't even see probable cause for the search of his home, much less arrest, or remand(!?), and lack of speedy trial. I'm guessing they had some kind of actual evidence that he was an imminent terror threat that either didn't materialize into a good case or was somehow later discredited. Otherwise, how many constitutional rights were violated here? History tells me the likely problem is incomplete reporting, although it's plenty possible he was still discriminated against even if the feds had much more than what was presented.

How often do you think the fbi drops charges and the judge throws out charges brought by the fbi for people they suspect of terrorism?
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
If what is written at face value is true, then I can't even see probable cause for the search of his home, much less arrest, or remand(!?), and lack of speedy trial. I'm guessing they had some kind of actual evidence that he was an imminent terror threat that either didn't materialize into a good case or was somehow later discredited. Otherwise, how many constitutional rights were violated here? History tells me the likely problem is incomplete reporting, although it's plenty possible he was still discriminated against even if the feds had much more than what was presented.

I would hope that in order to completely ruin someones life the government would at least need enough evidence for some sort of charge to stick. It said that they admitted in court that they had zero evidence that he made any direct threats to LEO yet their entire reason for holding him without bail was that he was supposedly a threat to LEO.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
29,214
41,322
136
Just imagine the horrors if he had taken over a Federal game preserve with some armed friends!

FBI, wtf.
 

PlanetJosh

Golden Member
May 6, 2013
1,814
143
106
Could a large movement of progressives flood the net with posts that try to tempt the U.S. authorities to arrest them in a similar manner? Wonder if this could lead to some kind of serious civil unrest.
 

FIVR

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2016
3,753
911
106
US gets closer and closer to a totalitarian state now that these corrupt agencies can use ubiquitous online surveillance to "make cases" instead of doing actual police work. What a wonderful time to be alive. It's too bad I won't be having any kids because I'm sure they'd love to grow up in a place where their Facebook posts could get them imprisoned for months.