- Aug 25, 2001
- 56,587
- 10,225
- 126
Well, this might just be the first time I've seen someone refer to the Daily Mail as a more legit source.For anyone interested here's some info in non-video format from a more legit source. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13552111/FedEx-trucks-spying-cameras-police.html
Forbes has learned the shipping and business services company is using AI tools made by Flock Safety, a $4 billion car surveillance startup, to monitor its distribution and cargo facilities across the United States. As part of the deal, FedEx is providing its Flock surveillance feeds to law enforcement, an arrangement that Flock has with at least four multi-billion dollar private companies. But publicly available documents reveal that some local police departments are also sharing their Flock feeds with FedEx — a rare instance of a private company availing itself of a police surveillance apparatus.
To civil rights activists, such close collaboration has the potential to dramatically expand Flock’s car surveillance network, which already spans 4,000 cities across over 40 states and some 40,000 cameras that track vehicles by license plate, make, model, color and other identifying characteristics, like dents or bumper stickers. Lisa Femia, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said because private entities aren’t subject to the same transparency laws as police, this sort of arrangement could “[leave] the public in the dark, while at the same time expanding a sort of mass surveillance network.”
The article you linked clearly states: "FedEx is using AI-powered cameras installed on its trucks to help aid police investigations, a new report from Forbes has revealed"Hey I didn't say Daily Mail is a good source, it's just better than some rando on YouTube. 🤣
Also is this actually on trucks or just the FedEx facilities? Most of the quotes I've seen indicate the facilities.
That's what the Daily Mail says, yes, but the Forbes report they based their article on says "distribution and cargo facilities". Doesn't seem to specifically state that cameras will be installed on trucks.The article you linked clearly states: "FedEx is using AI-powered cameras installed on its trucks to help aid police investigations, a new report from Forbes has revealed"
Well, I was quoting from the article that the person asking the question linked. Not doing extensive research.That's what the Daily Mail says, yes, but the Forbes report they based their article on says "distribution and cargo facilities". Doesn't seem to specifically state that cameras will be installed on trucks.
Paywall free linkWell, this might just be the first time I've seen someone refer to the Daily Mail as a more legit source.
But I do appreciate you linking an article instead of a video.
Edit: the Daily Mail seems to be sourcing their data from this Forbes article (paywalled, you'll need some kind of blocker or other solution to access): https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomas...lp-cops-build-an-ai-car-surveillance-network/
I mean, that is technically accurate. If not breaking any laws then nothing to fear. If breaking the law, well better look over your shoulder.Obligatory, "If you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear."
