Juddog
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2006
- 7,852
- 6
- 81
Does it matter what I feel?
I can ask loaded questions too.
You're right - since it doesn't matter what you feel, I've decided to simply put you on ignore, since this shows you're 100% troll.
Does it matter what I feel?
I can ask loaded questions too.
You're right - since it doesn't matter what you feel, I've decided to simply put you on ignore, since this shows you're 100% troll.
Or consent to sex. I think that the best solution is to set the age PlanB is available OTC to the same as the age of consent in the state.
The usual pissing match.
I'll ask a question outside the 2 neuron only rule and ask on what legal basis does the judge overrule the FDA?
That the government's decision to continue to deny it to all ages against medical advice was arbitrary and capricious.
This is the part that confuses me about some of the righties that post here.
They keep complaining that they want the government out of their lives, ok I get that.
Then the government does something to get out of their lives and they bitch about it.
Why not have the same age restrictions as other OTC medications?
Examples: aspirin, cold medicine, contraceptives
Honest question. Does this mean that men of any age can now get the pill?
Clearing the need for a prescription seems to clear the gender requirement. No?
I can think of several insidious reasons why a teenage boy might want to procure some of these. I doubt we are going to have to worry about this issue but I wonder what the answer is.
If a boy wants to get some of the pills, can he? :hmm:
Christians are all great parents and they teach their kids abstinence, which we all know is incredibly effective. So this ruling doesn't affect you at all.
Last time I bought Robitussin I had to show my Drivers License. Are you suggesting there are not age restrictions on other OTC medications?
Also you do realize that PlanB is basically a high-dosage version of a prescription medication right?
Essentially this ruling is saying children should be able to buy extra-strength tylenol, but not regular tylenol. :hmm:
Personally I think the ruling of the judge is just fine. Remove the prescription requirement from obtaining the morning after pill for teens if it is removed for adults.
There is no federal requirement for you to be 18 to buy Robitussin that I am aware of.
Interesting. We'll have to see how that works in higher courts with "any age".
Not entirely perhaps, but its proven that children, as a whole, don't have the maturity to make responsible decisions. So the same reasoning should be applied here. Only here, you also have a medical reason to deny this pill without a medical professional's consent first.
The case is pretty compelling. The FDA engaged in a pretty huge study on it and issued recommendations that it be sold this way after seeing the results. Sibelius overruled them and didn't give much of a reason. To me it was a pretty clear case of politics over medical advice.
With or without a prescription?
If they're old enough to have make a decision that could effect the rest of their lives their old enough to take a pill.
Without. I have several times. I'm not a minor either. I walk into any drug store pharmacy and ask to buy it. They check my ID and I make the purchase.
By removing the prescription bit, but changing it to having parental or guardian consent to obtain for minors it solves any problem you might imagine of having teenage boys able to buy this.
The case is pretty compelling. The FDA engaged in a pretty huge study on it and issued recommendations that it be sold this way after seeing the results. Sibelius overruled them and didn't give much of a reason. To me it was a pretty clear case of politics over medical advice.
Give me a break it's A MORNING AFTER PILL! If they're old enough to have make a decision that could effect the rest of their lives their old enough to take a pill.