FDA OKs First Human Trials of Embryonic Stem Cells

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Great news after lame Bush-era policies set medical research (at least this niche) back nearly a decade. I wonder what diseases and ailments we could have cured had Bush not been such a paleo-religious retard about embryonic stem cell research?

FDA OKs First Human Trials of Embryonic Stem Cells

The Federal Drug Administration has approved the first human trials of embryonic stem cells ? a sign of a new, liberal attitude toward stem cell research, which was hamstrung by the Bush administration.

Starting this summer, the biotech firm Geron will treat a small group of spinal-cord injury patients using neurons derived from stem cells, marking the first time embryonic stem cells will be tested in humans.


The trial is designed to test the safety of the treatment, not how well it works. Nonetheless, it's a huge first step for the field.

"It signals to me that we have the primary regulatory authorities on board for embryonic stem cells," said Alan Trounson, president of the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine, a $3 billion state initiative to support stem cell research. "That really is a tremendous piece of news."

Under the Bush administration, stem cell research was slowed by an executive order, signed in August 2001, that (severely) restricted the types of stem cells and stem cell research that could be conducted. President Barack Obama is widely expected to lift Bush?s executive order, perhaps as soon as next week.

Working in a handful of medical centers around the country, Geron will treat eight to 10 recent paraplegics, who can use their arms but not their legs. The patients will receive an injection of neurons to the site of the damage, followed by a short treatment of anti-rejection drugs.

Previous animal studies suggest the new neurons will repair damaged neurons and secrete substances to help nerves function and grow.

Amy Rick, president of Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research, a group of dozens of research institutions that support stem cell research, said the Geron trial is a milestone.

"It's hugely significant in the sense that it's the first approval of a human embryonic stem cell trial," she said. "In this week of hope and change, it feels even better."

While Geron scientists waited months for FDA approval of the stem cell treatment, they are reluctant to link the go-ahead directly to the inauguration of Obama.

A Geron spokeswoman said that the company had no evidence of political influence aiding their application.

?It?s just coincidental timing,? the spokeswoman said.

Karen Riley, an FDA spokeswoman, echoed that the timing was coincidental. "We make science-based decisions and politics is not a factor," she said.

But the new president surely didn't hurt matters. The chairman of Trounson's organization told the New York Times, "I think this approval is directly tied to the change in administration."

The approval is expected to the first of several trials involving embryonic stem cells. A recent CAMR report found that nine companies, including Geron, were in the process of developing human embryonic stem cell treatments.

Embryonic stem cells are like blank slates that can be transformed into different types of tissue. They've been hailed as the next big thing in medicine ever since University of Wisconsin scientist James Thomson showed their ability to regenerate in 1998. Since then, stem cells have been like a high school star turned NBA draft pick ? talented and expensive but undisciplined and perhaps not quite ready for the glare of the big game. Like many biotechnology techniques, the lag between scientific discovery and clinical treatment can be decades.

Still, the Regenerative Medicine Institute?s Trounson, who was a stem cell scientist in Australia before heading the California institute, said that experimental treatments are outpacing his expectations.

"We're running an agency funding this work and I'm astounded at what's happening in this space,? he said.

Trounson said there?s evidence in animal trials that stem cells are effective in treating ailments as varied as diabetes, Alzheimers, multiple scleorsis and macular degeneration.
?It?s just fantastic,? Trounson said. "And I would expect some of these to enter clinical trials sooner, rather than later."

His agency expects to fund up to a dozen scientists who think they can submit their stem cell work to the FDA for clinical trial approval within four years.

From there, those so-called investigational new drugs will have to follow the path that Geron's treatment did. The company submitted its application early in 2008. It was then put on hold in May 2008 and kicked back to the company for further review. Seven months later, the company resubmitted the application and received approval Wednesday, the day after the inauguration.

That said, Obama's political influence is likely to invigorate a field that ? despite impressive state-level and private efforts ? has been ham-strung by Federal regulation and the specter of increased government regulation.

"With President Obama there, there will be a big change not only in government administration and the public sector, but I think it will encourage the pharmaceutical companies to be involved as well," Trounson said.

http://blog.wired.com/wiredsci...1/fda-approves-em.html
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Last week, Bush, the Dark Ages for scientific research.

This week, Obama, we're on the cutting edge again.

Nice :thumbsup:
 

TallBill

Lifer
Apr 29, 2001
46,017
62
91
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Last week, Bush, the Dark Ages for scientific research.

This week, Obama, we're on the cutting edge again.

Nice :thumbsup:

Surprised that you had time to come up for air.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Last week, Bush, the Dark Ages for scientific research.

This week, Obama, we're on the cutting edge again.

Nice :thumbsup:

Seconded,
nothing like dogma to keep us in the dark ages.
 

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
81
Pretty exciting stuff, I'm anxious to see how these early trials work out.

And kind OT, but is anybody else sick of the words hope and change?
 

AFMatt

Senior member
Aug 14, 2008
248
0
0
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Last week, Bush, the Dark Ages for scientific research.

This week, Obama, we're on the cutting edge again.

Nice :thumbsup:

This procedure is the result of a decade of research, was submitted to the FDA last April, and the time taken since then has been used to determine it's safety. It has nothing to do with Obama being in office.
 

ZzZGuy

Golden Member
Nov 15, 2006
1,855
0
0
Originally posted by: AFMatt
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Last week, Bush, the Dark Ages for scientific research.

This week, Obama, we're on the cutting edge again.

Nice :thumbsup:

This procedure is the result of a decade of research, was submitted to the FDA last April, and the time taken since then has been used to determe it's safety. Has nothing to do with Obama being in office.

Not to give credit to Obama, but how many years could have been saved if Bush's denial of funding to the majority of steam cell research projects never happened?
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: AFMatt
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Last week, Bush, the Dark Ages for scientific research.

This week, Obama, we're on the cutting edge again.

Nice :thumbsup:

This procedure is the result of a decade of research, was submitted to the FDA last April, and the time taken since then has been used to determine it's safety. It has nothing to do with Obama being in office.

No, it doesn't, however there's no way the FDA would have approved this under the Bush Administration. Further, Bush's ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research has certainly slowed the research, although I note California passed a bill that funded it at the state-level and there were likely other private efforts...
 

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
81
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: AFMatt
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Last week, Bush, the Dark Ages for scientific research.

This week, Obama, we're on the cutting edge again.

Nice :thumbsup:

This procedure is the result of a decade of research, was submitted to the FDA last April, and the time taken since then has been used to determine it's safety. It has nothing to do with Obama being in office.

No, it doesn't, however there's no way the FDA would have approved this under the Bush Administration. Further, Bush's ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research has certainly slowed the research, although I note California passed a bill that funded it at the state-level and there were likely other private efforts...
I'm far from a fan of Bush's policies on stem cell research, but that's just BS. The timing of this approval is coincidental, has nothng to do with the new administration.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
As much as I disliked Bush's stance on embryonic stem cell research, he did not oppose it entirely. There is no indication that Bush held up this approval or that Obama is responsible for the approval.

While Geron scientists waited months for FDA approval of the stem cell treatment, they are reluctant to link the go-ahead directly to the inauguration of Obama.

A Geron spokeswoman said that the company had no evidence of political influence aiding their application.

?It?s just coincidental timing,? the spokeswoman said.

Karen Riley, an FDA spokeswoman, echoed that the timing was coincidental. "We make science-based decisions and politics is not a factor," she said.

 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: frostedflakes
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: AFMatt
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Last week, Bush, the Dark Ages for scientific research.

This week, Obama, we're on the cutting edge again.

Nice :thumbsup:

This procedure is the result of a decade of research, was submitted to the FDA last April, and the time taken since then has been used to determine it's safety. It has nothing to do with Obama being in office.

No, it doesn't, however there's no way the FDA would have approved this under the Bush Administration. Further, Bush's ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research has certainly slowed the research, although I note California passed a bill that funded it at the state-level and there were likely other private efforts...
I'm far from a fan of Bush's policies on stem cell research, but that's just BS. The timing of this approval is coincidental, has nothng to do with the new administration.
First of all, I never credited Obama with any of this. Why are you guys creating straw men arguments?
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: frostedflakes
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: AFMatt
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Last week, Bush, the Dark Ages for scientific research.

This week, Obama, we're on the cutting edge again.

Nice :thumbsup:

This procedure is the result of a decade of research, was submitted to the FDA last April, and the time taken since then has been used to determine it's safety. It has nothing to do with Obama being in office.

No, it doesn't, however there's no way the FDA would have approved this under the Bush Administration. Further, Bush's ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research has certainly slowed the research, although I note California passed a bill that funded it at the state-level and there were likely other private efforts...
I'm far from a fan of Bush's policies on stem cell research, but that's just BS. The timing of this approval is coincidental, has nothng to do with the new administration.
First of all, I never credited Obama with any of this. Why are you guys creating straw men arguments?

You didn't. Jpeyton did.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: mugs
There is no indication that Bush held up this approval or that Obama is responsible for the approval.
There is no indication that Bush cooked the books on Iraqi WMDs either.

But why play dumb when you don't have to?
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: AFMatt
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Last week, Bush, the Dark Ages for scientific research.

This week, Obama, we're on the cutting edge again.

Nice :thumbsup:

This procedure is the result of a decade of research, was submitted to the FDA last April, and the time taken since then has been used to determine it's safety. It has nothing to do with Obama being in office.

No, it doesn't, however there's no way the FDA would have approved this under the Bush Administration. Further, Bush's ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research has certainly slowed the research, although I note California passed a bill that funded it at the state-level and there were likely other private efforts...

And you also must realize that there have been significant progress in adult stem cells which renders would significantly reduces the need for embryonic stem cells.

Like it or not there are moral issues that go along with embryonic stem cells.
 

AFMatt

Senior member
Aug 14, 2008
248
0
0
Originally posted by: Sedition
Originally posted by: AFMatt
I saw that one the news earlier and thought it was great news.
As far as blame for all the slow progress in stem cell research, this guy doesn't agree with placing it all on Bush:
http://blog.wired.com/wiredsci...01/embryonic-stem.html

A Blog? Well there's a valid source for information.

I know.. And it's the same blog the article that started this thread is posted on. Who knew Wired.com worked that way? Craziness!

The source of the information is William B. Hurlbut, M.D. ( http://www.stanford.edu/~ethics/Site/Main.html ). It was merely reported on Wired.com.