- May 6, 2004
- 6,285
- 1
- 0
I am well aware the latter is a licensed derivative of sony's trinitron and both are AG tubes. people on AT forums apeear to hail the Mitsu/NEC monitors to be the king of the hill. while i have seen a couple of them at the stores, i been using FD trinitrons for about 4 years now. Is the difference readily noticeable? better yet, does the difference stem from the inherent characteristics of the tubes or the rest of the monitor (all that stuff goes on the PCB)?
the NEC was going to be my new monitor in a next couple of days, till i saw this.
another one
yet another
actually they have some NF Diamondtrons as well, does it sport the same tube as the famous NEC 2147s?
the NEC was going to be my new monitor in a next couple of days, till i saw this.
another one
yet another
actually they have some NF Diamondtrons as well, does it sport the same tube as the famous NEC 2147s?