FBI wants Internet records kept 2 years: source

ValkyrieofHouston

Golden Member
Sep 26, 2005
1,736
0
0
I looked to see if this was a repost and could not find. If it is just lock and bump up the original thread.
________________________



By Jeremy Pelofsky and Michele Gershberg Thu Jun 1, 6:27 PM ET

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Federal Bureau of Investigation wants U.S. Internet providers to retain Web address records for up to two years to aid investigations into terrorism and pornography, a source familiar with the matter said on Thursday.

The request came during a May 26 meeting between U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and
FBI Director Robert Mueller with top executives at companies like Google Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Time Warner Inc.'s AOL.

"I think there is less of a willingness to passively go along with this type of request than there might have been a year ago," said the source, mentioning the recent uproar over a report that telephone companies had provided call records to the National Security Agency.

A Justice Department spokesman confirmed the meeting but was not immediately available to comment on how long law enforcement officials wanted the records retained.

"This meeting was an initial discussion for the Attorney General to gather information and to solicit input from Internet service provider executives on the issues associated with data retention," said spokesman Brian Roehrkasse.

The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Gonzales presented blurred images of child pornography and explained why he thought retaining data was important to those investigations. At issue was Internet protocol addresses.

When one industry executive questioned how long the government wanted the records kept, Mueller said for two years and that the data would also be used for anti-terrorism purposes, said the source.

The Justice Department has tangled before with Internet companies over gaining access to records, subpoenaing search data from Google to defend an online pornography law. The government cut the size of its demand and Google acquiesced.

In that instance, Microsoft and Yahoo Inc. (Nasdaq:YHOO - news) had turned over search information after receiving assurances that no specific customer data was involved.

The IP address is key to unlocking what a person does online, what site they visited what terms they searched, who they e-mailed and what they downloaded, the source noted. Internet providers usually change the address data within several days to several weeks.

Two big high-speed Internet service providers, Verizon Communications and Comcast Corp., also attended the meeting last week, the source said.

The Justice Department spokesman said Internet companies would retain the information and the government would only gain access to the records through legal means like a subpoena. "Internet service providers would retain the information," Roehrkasse said.

If Congress is going to be asked to pass legislation ordering Internet providers to retain data they won't be asked for content of that data but rather addresses e-mails were sent and sites they visited, Roehrkasse said.

Recommendations are expected to be submitted to Gonzales in the next several weeks, according to another source.

Data retention is a "complicated issue with implications not only for efforts to combat child pornography but also for security, privacy, safety, and availability of low-cost or free Internet services," said Microsoft senior security strategist Phil Reitinger.

Google spokesman Steve Langdon said proposals by the United States and
European Union on data retention "require careful review and must balance the legitimate interests of individual users, law enforcement agencies, and Internet companies."

The Justice Department's chief privacy officer on Thursday met with a group of officials from rights groups including the Electronic Privacy Information Center, the Center for American Progress, Cato Institute, the Center for Democracy and Technology, Roehrkasse said.

The
American Civil Liberties Union was also invited but did not attend, he said. Other Justice Department officials were meeting with victims rights groups and law enforcement groups to discuss the same issues.

(Additional reporting Deborah Charles in Washington, Daisuke Wakabayashi in Seattle and Eric Auchard in San Francisco)

Link to Text
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
The Justice Department spokesman said Internet companies would retain the information and the government would only gain access to the records through legal means like a subpoena. "Internet service providers would retain the information," Roehrkasse said.

Why does that sound familiar and completely unbelievable?
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,453
136
Bit by bit, piece by piece our privacy and civil liberties are being chipped away so methodically, so secretly and so successfully. All of the people who say 'You shouldn't care if you have nothing to hide' that is 100% bullsh1t. Do you think that Jefferson or Jackson or Franklin would have stood for this? No, absolutely not, civil liberties, pursuit of happiness, never before written down as a right is what we founded the country on; Freedom, and we are losing it to this facist, theological regime.
 

ValkyrieofHouston

Golden Member
Sep 26, 2005
1,736
0
0
Did you know, the United States ranks 13th on the Human Freedom Index. Twelve other countries are freer than the United States. (fact taken from the United Nations). And don't for one minute think that all those illegal immigrants are coming to this country to be "free", they are coming here for other reasons. Most of which are monetary. Alot of these folks are utilizing the resources of this country and sending these resources back to their families in their own homelands. Others come here for their educational needs, then go back to their countries once they have accomplished what they came here for.
 

MadRat

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
11,999
307
126
Americans make up the criteria for freedom index. Funny that they aren't at the top.
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
I thought they werent collecting things like ip addresses?

werent they supposed to only be collecting searches and site hits?

what a big ol gob of bullsh!t we are getting fed.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,701
18,032
126
My concern is more with the cost than with the record keeping. Who is going to pay it? FBI? Storage of 2 years of usage record is not cheap.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: sdifox
My concern is more with the cost than with the record keeping. Who is going to pay it? FBI? Storage of 2 years of usage record is not cheap.

I am going thorugh the Sarbanes Oxley compliance BS right now. I honestly dont know how small business's can survive with this oppressive electronic records retention law.

You think it is cheap to keep backups of your files on a non-eraseable medium?


 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
The other problem is that the people doing the dirty deeds are just going to hack into someone elses computer--not in the is case to make it a zombie span machine,
but instead to use it to create a false identity--and if course that does not count all the wi-fi spots, or using a number of other foreign websites to conceal identity. So its unlikely
that that any actual terrorist or pedafile will be caught--but its highly likely many innocent people will catch the blame.

Look how long it took to catch Kevin Mitnick--------and these clowns can't even catch Osama Bin Laden.

No, in my book its simple---------my vote is for Alberto Gonzales for the unemployment line---we have enough government waste, fraud, and corruption already. This government program would be a black hole
of endless abuse.