soundforbjt
Lifer
- Feb 15, 2002
- 17,788
- 6,041
- 136
Ohhh, falling back on boring old tropes. Somehow you guys always miss "let" in there.
Are we about to see another amazing Legendkiller foray into the world of statistics!? I can't wait! By the way I was trying to be nice there as 538 gives him the best odds out of the polling analysis sites. He's usually in the single digits.
Considering how spot on your debate prediction was though I'm sure you're right about this too.
Lol.
Does Laureate ring a bell?
You know if he wins, this will end badly for the DNC. Everything is gonna get rolled up. Why do you think they loved him before he ran and now hate him?
You're being pretty cavalier about his statements.
He did say when you're famous they "let" you do anything. He's actually claiming he DID NOT sexually assault women. The few women that have come forward are claiming that they were, these are very different things. Depending on how many women he grabbed, that percentage could really be minuscule. Still concerning, but clearly not what this thread is about. This thread is about Russian involvement in FBI investigations, and how to put an immediate stop to the FBI and Comey.
Oh my god this is amazing. Are you claiming that all the women he assaulted wanted him to assault them? This is almost as good as your claim about the forged audio.
Which debate prediction?
Nate's statistical analysis worked once. Wow. He's got the same track record as Ron Paul and Schiff. Woohoo.
You realize that someone not explicitly stopping you from committing sexual assault does not absolve you of sexual assault, right?
lol, so he might have grabbed a butt here or there, how awful. That's never happened in the history of history.
The only people really offended by that are SJWs, beta males, and ugly women.
I've seen more "sexual assaults" happen at bars in NYC in a span of 2 hrs.
No, it's worked very well for the 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014 elections. More importantly, his ratio of right to wrong analysis is very high, unlike Schiff or Ron Paul.
More importantly though you're in absolutely no position to critique anyone on statistics considering you know jack shit about them.
I'm just going to quote this because there's nothing that I could say that will make you look stupider than what you just wrote.
Thank you for showing everyone how gross you are, lol.
soundforbjt
Lifer
- Feb 15, 2002
- 17,788
- 6,041
- 136
Since it's Friday night, why don't you go to your local watering hole and grab all the "good looking" women's asses/whatever and tell us how it ends.
John Connor
Lifer
- Nov 30, 2012
- 22,757
- 619
- 121
Nothing will come of this because the DOJ won't prosecute. Just another way of Comey trying to relieve the pressure off his ass when he knows he's a sack.
Yes, just look at Brexit. Great call there. And the primaries.
Yes, you can call me out on some word smithing or some apparent technical term misuse, but at the end of the day, I've been right.
So, the emails:
- Weren't from HRC's private server;
- Weren't from HRC;
- Weren't previously withheld
Yawn. The reaction is more interesting than the news
There's only one reason why Comey announced that he might have some info which might or might not be relevant. Comey was hoping that this announcement would hurt Clinton's predominence and allow his fellow Republicans to hold onto their Senate majority.
- Weren't from HRC's private server;
- Weren't from HRC;
- Weren't previously withheld
Yawn. The reaction is more interesting than the news
There's only one reason why Comey announced that he might have some info which might or might not be relevant. Comey was hoping that this announcement would hurt Clinton's predominence and allow his fellow Republicans to hold onto their Senate majority.
Yes let's look at brexit, where the polls showed 'leave' as a toss up or even ahead before the vote. Pundits disagreed, polls didn't.
And no, you haven't been right in basically any discussion we've had that involves statistics. It's abundantly clear that you not only don't know how to run them, you don't even know how to read them. You're incompetent.
This is a lot more nuanced than you want or care to believe.
What I am saying is that he did not admit to sexual assault. Admitting to sexual assault implies he KNEW there wasn't consent, and did it anyways.
Please be aware, that my argument, is not a defense of his actions, and if used in a court of law, he would still be guilty. Whether or not he knew he sexually assaulted someone has absolutely nothing to do with guilt. But it has to do with you claiming that he ADMITTED to sexually assaulting women. He admitted to grabbing women by the pussy, and in his mind, they welcomed it.
We are talking about the highest office in the nation, so lets not be disingenuous here.
soundforbjt
Lifer
- Feb 15, 2002
- 17,788
- 6,041
- 136
Are you a alpha or a beta? Being married never stopped an alpha like Trump!
While I have mostly stayed out of this entire circle jerk, it was just reported that the emails in question were on Anthony Weiner's phone. Now correct me if I'm wrong but at the time the FBI seized his phone for sexting a 15 year old I don't think there is anyway he could have had security clearance for classified material. So if, and while it's a big if I'm not sure what else would make the FBI reopen the probe, they find classified information on his phone isn't the sender pretty much automatically guilty of committing a felony?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/29/us/politics/fbi-hillary-clinton-email.html?_r=0
Disclaimer: Not a Trump or Hillary supporter.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/29/us/politics/fbi-hillary-clinton-email.html?_r=0
Disclaimer: Not a Trump or Hillary supporter.
theeedude
Lifer
- Feb 5, 2006
- 35,787
- 6,197
- 126
Comey should resign. I don't see how he can continue to function as FBI director after this.
He went down this road when he made an unusual and unprofessional exception and publicly presented evidence against a person whom his own agency decided did not commit a crime. He wanted to have it both ways. FBI can't have it both ways. Either FBI thinks someone is guilty of a crime and then their job is to refer the case to prosecutors, or they aren't, in which case the FBI's job is to leave them alone. It's not the FBI's job to publicly trash or cast shadows on people who they don't bring charges against.
He went down this road when he made an unusual and unprofessional exception and publicly presented evidence against a person whom his own agency decided did not commit a crime. He wanted to have it both ways. FBI can't have it both ways. Either FBI thinks someone is guilty of a crime and then their job is to refer the case to prosecutors, or they aren't, in which case the FBI's job is to leave them alone. It's not the FBI's job to publicly trash or cast shadows on people who they don't bring charges against.
No, not even close. The sender would have to know the information was classified when sent.
flexy
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2001
- 8,464
- 155
- 106
Well that's all cool! But how many of the drunkards at the bar are running for prez? Is this the new standard for US politics now?
OH YES IT IS!
So you're saying you agree that he would be found guilty in a court of law if he tried your excuse? Case closed then.
theeedude
Lifer
- Feb 5, 2006
- 35,787
- 6,197
- 126
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 411
Facebook
Twitter