- Aug 9, 2002
- 16,666
- 21
- 81
And Wiki's response? No!
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/08/03/fbi.seal.wikipedia/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn
"The FBI's deputy general counsel, David Larson, cities a particular law that says duplicating an official "insignia" is illegal without permission."
"But Wikipedia strikes back on that point, saying the FBI redacted the most important part of that U.S. code, which defines an insignia as "any badge, identification card, or other insignia."
"Badges and identification cards are physical manifestations that may be used by a possessor to invoke the authority of the federal government. An encyclopedia article is not," Wikipedia's letter says. "The use of the image on Wikipedia is not for the purpose of deception or falsely to represent anyone as an agent of the federal government.""
Just another case of someone misrepresenting of what the law actually meant!
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/08/03/fbi.seal.wikipedia/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn
"The FBI's deputy general counsel, David Larson, cities a particular law that says duplicating an official "insignia" is illegal without permission."
"But Wikipedia strikes back on that point, saying the FBI redacted the most important part of that U.S. code, which defines an insignia as "any badge, identification card, or other insignia."
"Badges and identification cards are physical manifestations that may be used by a possessor to invoke the authority of the federal government. An encyclopedia article is not," Wikipedia's letter says. "The use of the image on Wikipedia is not for the purpose of deception or falsely to represent anyone as an agent of the federal government.""
Just another case of someone misrepresenting of what the law actually meant!
Last edited:
