I assume what you are referring to are the well-publicized cases of entrapment, which actually make this issue a complicated one and not the fake, simple one that you are trying to paint here: "it's because they are poor minorities! Oh boo hoo hoo!" No, no one argued that or defended the accused on those lines. It's about entrapment, which is, indeed, a moral and technical problem when it comes to prosecuting such cases. It isn't about letting the suspects off the hook--it's about understanding where or how the supposed crime occurred.
It seems that you don't understand any of this.
In this case of white right-wing nazis like these fellas, there are recordings of them talking about murder plans (they actually seem really dumb in this transcript--just spit-balling scenarios as if life is a video game, using terms they probably only learned playing video games), where afaik, they aren't being provided resources by undercover agents, and pulled along into "creating crimes." Maybe they are, though, I actually don't know, yet.
If that is the case, then it would be comparable. I'm not sure that it is. I do know that you are a very ignorant person, however.
The case YOU made excuses for and blamed the FBI for 'entrapment' had the suspects on tape plotting to blow up aircraft and other things... then had them caught red handed trying to plant what they thought were bombs outside a Jih
I assume what you are referring to are the well-publicized cases of entrapment, which actually make this issue a complicated one and not the fake, simple one that you are trying to paint here: "it's because they are poor minorities! Oh boo hoo hoo!" No, no one argued that or defended the accused on those lines. It's about entrapment, which is, indeed, a moral and technical problem when it comes to prosecuting such cases. It isn't about letting the suspects off the hook--it's about understanding where or how the supposed crime occurred.
It seems that you don't understand any of this.
In this case of white right-wing nazis like these fellas, there are recordings of them talking about murder plans (they actually seem really dumb in this transcript--just spit-balling scenarios as if life is a video game, using terms they probably only learned playing video games), where afaik, they aren't being provided resources by undercover agents, and pulled along into "creating crimes." Maybe they are, though, I actually don't know, yet.
If that is the case, then it would be comparable. I'm not sure that it is. I do know that you are a very ignorant person, however.
In the case YOU defended, the suspects were on tape admitting to wanting to blow up aircraft and other facilities. They were caught red handed planting what they believed were bombs outside a Jewish Center.
You defended that crap, based on the suspects being "poor" and that the FBI was just out to entrap some poor people. Of course, NEVERMIND the details about what they had claimed to want to do and what they actually DID once given what they thought were weapons!
What's hilarious is your amazingly hypocritical first post, derping on about imaginary actions of others blaming the FBI- THAT YOU DID YOURSELF when it was suspects you defend based on BS rather than the facts. YOU were the one blathering about the FBI being the 'deep state' and just out to get poor people, even when you had to ignore an actual attempted bombing of a Jewish center- something no one would ever be "entrapped" into doing.
Your hypocrisy is BLATANT and shows your complete lack of character. Meanwhile, you know full well my position and others you try and falsely accuse of what you are guilty of- our positions have never changed. When these types of creeps are caught plotting terror acts- lock them up! Doesn't matter who they are or what the agenda. YOU on the other hand, your defense or condemnation of these type of things changes on a dime.
It's hilarious- one second you're blaming the FBI for doing their job because "poor people!" and the next you're MAKING UP straight out of your rear end that anyone else does what you've done when its these creeps.
Oh and I suppose the hatchet attack incident- that must have been 'entrapment' even as a person was caught in the act of wielding a hatchet against innocent people! There was another case of some radical who already had one machine gun and was looking for others to commit terror acts (basically the EXACT flip side of this incident!) that the usual suspects around here also defended!
Mass murder was planned in my hometown. The shooter had procured a machine gun. In an utterly shocking moment, it was discovered that the man was using his Islamic religion as the basis for this attack...
forums.anandtech.com
Meh. I'd like proof that it was a real plan under action and not the typical FBI/Homeland investigation that is nothing more than a case of entrapment.
^ LOL so the TYPICAL investigation is nothing more than entrapment. Now just IMAGINE ye of no character, leveling that charge with this case. TYPICAL right??
And it's other people making up conspiracy theories? Riiiiight.