you got the response you deserve.
He deserves compassion and a huge medical effort to find a way to cure conservative brain disease. Nobody has it because they wanted to be sick. They had to be sick to survive as children.
you got the response you deserve.
Obama was answering a question posed by Stewart, who used the word "optimal." I'm not sure what we're even discussing here...
Only buffoons. That is funny for Internet memes but nothing more than a simple gaffe and doesn't speak with any depth to Romney either.But we have "binders full of women" to be upset about.
Only buffoons. That is funny for Internet memes but nothing more than a simple gaffe and doesn't speak with any depth to Romney either.
Oh, there was other stuff Romney said about women that does speak to him, but I thought the binders was just a poor slip of the tongueI'd say it was mostly meaningless but I think the binders comment spoke to something bigger.
Romney responded to an answer about fair pay at work by talking about how he made sure to hire women in his cabinet as Governor. In fact the way he framed it was that it was political posturing--we need women because there are a lot of women out there. Obama then responded by citing his first bill signed as President--the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.
There's a difference between a gaffe that actually says something about a candidate and one that is just a pairing of words that sounds poorly taken out of context. While binders is also not to be taken seriously, it had more staying power because people genuinely responded with a 'Huh?' when he answered the question. More importantly it reinforced an existing perception.
This 'gaffe' really has no meaning at all.
Take all of the people who care about this issue.
Subtract from that all of the people who would never vote for Obama under any circumstances.
You're left with the null set.
You don't understand how elections work
No one changes their vote.
The winner is the team who's fans bother to vote.
Very good point and since it looks like such an overwhelming Obama victory I'd like to suggest to all his supporters to go out and have a beer or a glass of wine on election day instead of voting.
Just think how much trouble Obama would be in if he ever granted an interview with a legitimate news agency. The guy even fucks up on the Jon Stewbert Show, maybe he needs another visit to "The View" with Whoopi "it wasn't rape-rape" Goldberg.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...at-criticises-Presidents-optimal-comment.html
One of the victims mother was pretty outraged.Except it only looks like "fucking up" to people who have an embarrassingly obvious vested interest in claiming Obama fucked up. And to be honest, I don't believe there is a single person out there who is genuinely outraged by what he said unless they're very, very stupid.
I'll be consistent, Obama was merely repeating a term Stewart used in framing his question. It wasn't really his choice of words he was only responding. He also didn't call the Benghazi attack an act of terror in the Rose Garden speech on 9/12.The problem isn't excessive outrage over something a political said, since that tends to happen quite often, it's outrage about something that wasn't even really said. Did Obama say the actual words "not optimal"? Sure, but does anyone ACTUALLY think he said that to make light of dead Americans? Or was he just replying using Jon Stewart's phrase and you all are very obviously trying to make something out of it?
You don't understand how elections work
No one changes their vote.
The winner is the team who's fans bother to vote.
What evidence is there that she's not very, very stupid, though?One of the victims mother was pretty outraged.
This 'gaffe' nearly as laughable as lipstick on a pig. He was using the phrase almost sarcastically to make a point. To paraphrase:
Stewart: Is how the government handled this optimal?
Obama: Of course it's 'not optimal' when four Americans are killed.
Another paraphrase:
Stewart: Did the government handle this perfectly?
Obama: Perfect? Four Americans are dead--that's not perfect.
Taken in a soundbyte, it is a poor choice of words, but that's it
Well, I generally file this under 'the exception proves the rule'. A small percentage (I would guess much less than 20%) of voters are 'available' to be swung from election to election. Even fewer are willing to change their votes during the campaign.If you actually followed and read polls as much as I do, you'd know that this is not true. A lot of people do change their minds during the course of an election, and especially this one thanks to Obama phoning in his performance in the first debate.
It's just that some things change votes and some don't. And BS "controversies" like this one don't.
What evidence is there that she's not very, very stupid, though?
Cut her some slack, her son is dead.What evidence is there that she's not very, very stupid, though?
One of the victims mother was pretty outraged.
I'll be consistent, Obama was merely repeating a term Stewart used in framing his question. It wasn't really his choice of words he was only responding. He also didn't call the Benghazi attack an act of terror in the Rose Garden speech on 9/12.
Earlier today I didn't know about Stewart using the phrase in asking the question but even then, I wasn't that concerned about it. This is silly. There are so many legitimate "outrages" to be had about this affair that spending time on some BS like this is only a distraction.
No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.
Benghazi: Four Americans Died, Obama Lied, And The Press Complied
http://www.forbes.com/sites/billfla...icans-died-obama-lied-and-the-press-complied/
As soon as you see the lefties start citing sources like TPM or HuffPo or Mediamatters....really Mediamatters? wtf, a pay to play site? You know they're lying and covering up. A nice article by Forbes.