werepossum
Elite Member
- Jul 10, 2006
- 29,873
- 463
- 126
lol +1A skinny one
Or, you know, roll over them.Card givers probably too scared to give them out to anyone that might stand up to them.
lol +1A skinny one
Or, you know, roll over them.Card givers probably too scared to give them out to anyone that might stand up to them.
Maybe it was a radio prank.
Yes, it is true. But we're in an acceptance faze. If you don't accept someone for how they are, and instead suggest they do things to better themselves you're labeled in a negative way.
I don't hate fat people - I'd never rally against them, but isn't it objectively true that fat people contribute less efficiently to society? Increased healthcare costs alone, but add to that dying younger, eating more food leaving less for others (individually inconsequential but on a massive scale (no pun intended) has many implications), etc.
I mean, isn't it objectively true that being fit and healthy is better than being fat?
Probably, but people pretending that they know enough about someone they've never met to start preaching to them about what their problems are and how they should fix them is as mind-bogglingly ignorant as those who used to burn people suspected of witchcraft or throw people out of villages who had some kind of health problem, "because it might be contagious".
The same goes for the occasional prick who uploads a photo to the Internet of a person getting out of a wheelchair to retrieve something from a high shelf, with a comment along the lines of "obviously they're not disabled then!", or "obvious benefits scrounger!".
From my own personal perspective (disclaimer: I am not a medical professional) I am often amazed how so many people have trouble maintaining a sensible weight when I struggle to put on another kilo (while I now have a normal BMI, the docs want me to gain a bit of pudge to help me fight off problems I'm susceptible to). I count the calories from the opposite perspective of course, and things are made somewhat harder by the fact that the list of foods I know I can't eat is very long and the list of foods I know I can eat is very short, but I can't help but think "it's not rocket science is it? I have to be disciplined, why can't other people", but the fact of the matter is that I don't know these other people.
Furthermore, show me someone who is disciplined in all parts of their life. I know I'm not. Would it be OK to start handing out notes to people whom one thinks is drinking too much (my mum is pretty much teetotal and used to try and discourage anyone in the family from drinking even an amount that would make one merry let alone slurring/drunk/etc), or every person who isn't dressing that well or hasn't got a really snappy hairstyle or whatever deserves a note (a lack of self respect is likely a symptom of something bad!)? How about if one disapproves of credit card use and deems it a symptom of the debt culture and starts handing out notes accordingly? Should notes be handed out to those who are deemed to be too skinny?
Also, people have different coping mechanisms. Some people use food as one. Some people throw up their food and see that as them "getting better". How do people suppose that one who comfort eats is going to react if someone hands them a note informing them that they're a fat fuck?
I don't hate fat people - I'd never rally against them
I hate fat people. They deserve a shameful death immediately. It's obviously their own fault that I hate them and their disgustingness in 100% of cases.
So for the people who don't want obesity to be called out as unhealthy what is the alternative when it comes to a national healthcare system? Eventually it will run the system dry.
I agree with that and I think that actually helps in any healthcare system.You could dramatically reduce the cost of healthcare by removing profit from the equation. I suggest starting by removing the ability to have hospitals with shareholders. Or starting some 100% government funded hospitals. That would take for-profit insurance out of the equation as well.
I agree with that and I think that actually helps in any healthcare system.
But lets say that is done, do the doctors now just lie about obesity and health? Do they just ignore it? As not for profit doctors are they just going to accept they don't get paid as high and will that be a desirable field to even work in at that point?
I also think even without for profit medicine that costs of healthcare are just simply very expensive, it takes a lot of school, it takes highest grade materials and medicine and none of that comes cheap.
To me that is the most important part, but with the "Fat shaming" crusaders a term I simply think is brain dead when it has nothing to do with being fat, it has to do with poor health, I worry that this much needed part to a social healthcare system will be undermined.Well, in Canada we have the single-payer universal system. Our doctors are essentially employees of the Province. I'm not 100% sure how their pay is negotiated but I'm guessing its either straight salary for the year, or on a per-procedure basis. Or a mix of both.
But because the doctors work for the province, and healthcare is paid for by the provinces (indirectly, but thats a different topic), it is in the province's interest to have proper education on good health. So we have health taught in schools and PSA's all over the place, etc. Fewer unhealthy people means less healthcare costs. Plus fewer unhealthy people means taxes are "reasonable."
In a for-profit healthcare system, none of that is compatible with making money. Sick people make money. Healthy people don't. Doctors have no financial incentive to encourage or educate good health, and neither does the State, because they make money from sick people.
I think you're confusing when I said:
with something akin to: