Fastest SATA 3.0 drive?

cbn

Lifer
Mar 27, 2009
12,968
221
106

jkresh

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2001
2,436
0
71
non ssd, then the raptor has the fastest seek times, for sequential read writes then probably one of the new drives with the 500gig platters (though the raptor is close).
 

cbn

Lifer
Mar 27, 2009
12,968
221
106
http://forums.anandtech.com/me...=2289889&enterthread=y

According to the 4th post in this thread Raptors have 2.5" platters while larger drives have 3.5" platters.

So what is the big deal about 10,000 rpm vs 7200 rpm if this is true? (Wouldn't larger diameter platter somewhat offset the decreased RPMS in terms of surface area read per unit time)

Now if we were talking 3.5" Platters spinning 10,000 rpms vs 3.5" Platters spinning 7200 rpms then maybe the differences would be greater.
 

GprophetB

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2003
2,632
0
76
Heres my picks for large Sata 3 drives

1. WD black caviar 1 TB (Overall winner despite being expensive)
2. Samsung Spinpoint 1 TB
3. Hitachi 7k1000 1 TB (Overall bang for buck winner)
4. Seagate 7200.12 T TB

Caviar is the best overall , Hitachi is the overall winner in price / performance ratio (as of today when i wrote this, i scored a hitachi drive for 78ish with the 10% 1 day newegg coupon)
 

sgrinavi

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2007
4,537
0
76
Originally posted by: GprophetB
Heres my picks for large Sata 3 drives

1. WD black caviar 1 TB (Overall winner despite being expensive)
2. Samsung Spinpoint 1 TB
3. Hitachi 7k1000 1 TB (Overall bang for buck winner)
4. Seagate 7200.12 T TB

Caviar is the best overall , Hitachi is the overall winner in price / performance ratio (as of today when i wrote this, i scored a hitachi drive for 78ish with the 10% 1 day newegg coupon)

I was under the impression that the new Seagate 500 GB 7200.12 smoked the 1TB drives in every aspect. No?
Here's a pair in RAID0 short stroked
 

taltamir

Lifer
Mar 21, 2004
13,576
6
76
Originally posted by: Just learning
http://forums.anandtech.com/me...=2289889&enterthread=y

According to the 4th post in this thread Raptors have 2.5" platters while larger drives have 3.5" platters.

So what is the big deal about 10,000 rpm vs 7200 rpm if this is true? (Wouldn't larger diameter platter somewhat offset the decreased RPMS in terms of surface area read per unit time)

Now if we were talking 3.5" Platters spinning 10,000 rpms vs 3.5" Platters spinning 7200 rpms then maybe the differences would be greater.

it would. at the cost of random writes / seek time because it takes longer for the heads to move from the center to the outside. the raptor being 2.5 inch sacrifices some sequential for random performance and seek times
 

pjkenned

Senior member
Jan 14, 2008
630
0
71
www.servethehome.com
Originally posted by: TemjinGold
The fastest nonSSD HD would be a 15k SAS drive.

Depends if you want access time (2.5" 15k drives) or sequential read performance (3.5" 15k drives).

Then again, the title says "Fastest SATA 3.0 drive?" so SAS is excluded.

The question is whether this is a OS or storage drive. Most home users that need storage have relatively large files compared to an OS access pattern.
 

ochadd

Senior member
May 27, 2004
408
0
76
Velociraptor is going to smoke any non-SSD SATA drive out there. They are faster in access times and seq. transfers than 10k rpm SAS drives in desktop usage.