• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Fastest Computer Spawns High-Tech Race

Adul

Elite Member
Got to love super computers<a class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://apnews.excite.com/article/20021217/D7NVBOC80.html" target=blank>
Link</A>

<!--StartFragment -->
<FONT face=Verdana,Sans-serif><FONT color=black size=2>YOKOHAMA, Japan (AP) - It's a machine so fast it performs more computations per second than there are stars in our galaxy. It's so large it's housed in a building the size of an aircraft hangar.</FONT></FONT>
<FONT face=Verdana,Sans-serif><FONT color=black size=2>Running 35.6 trillion calculations per second, the Earth Simulator is the fastest supercomputer in the world, almost five times faster than the next best one and as fast as the top 5 U.S. supercomputers combined.</FONT></FONT>
<FONT face=Verdana,Sans-serif><FONT color=black size=2>For the Japanese scientists using the $350 million computer, it means climate research, with its complex simulations and diverse mix of variables, is more accurate than ever before.</FONT></FONT>
 
Originally posted by: Dulanic
Thirty-five million cubic feet of air roar through the building every 10 seconds to keep the monster from overheating.

:Q Holy crap



I thought my box was too loud.



Well, what brings competition is always great. So when can we start seeing the desktop versions of these? 10, 15 years from now?
 
Built by the Tokyo-based NEC Corp. (NIPNY), the computer can already predict the path of a typhoon or a volcanic eruption with remarkable precision.

I find this statement extremely hard to believe.
 
Operator: So HAL, what will the weather be like to today?

HAL:: It will be windy in Chicago, it will rain in Northern Brazil, and Stalingrad will be cold.

Operator: You suck, HAL! There is no way I'm paying millions for a piece of junk. I'm returning you tommorow!

HAL: I'm affraid I can't let you do that Bob.

 
Originally posted by: Roger
Built by the Tokyo-based NEC Corp. (NIPNY), the computer can already predict the path of a typhoon or a volcanic eruption with remarkable precision.

I find this statement extremely hard to believe.

That is insanity! lol Can it predict a persons date of death as well?

 
Originally posted by: BentValve
Originally posted by: Roger
Built by the Tokyo-based NEC Corp. (NIPNY), the computer can already predict the path of a typhoon or a volcanic eruption with remarkable precision.
I find this statement extremely hard to believe.
That is insanity! lol Can it predict a persons date of death as well?

heh how about one to predict what a women thinks 😉
 
Some perspective:

My laptop has a theoretical peak speed of about 7.5 Gigaflops. In 1990, a fast supercomputer was in the 1 Gigaflop range sustained.

That computer you linked is about 36 Teraflops, ie. 35000X the speed of a supercomputer in 1988, and almost 5000X the peak speed of my laptop.

Also:

1985 Cray X-MP

Cost:$8,000,000
60,000 watts of power
No Built in Graphics

1997 Nintendo 64

Cost: $149
5 watts of power
Interactive 3D Graphics

😛
 
Originally posted by: Adul
Originally posted by: BentValve
Originally posted by: Roger
Built by the Tokyo-based NEC Corp. (NIPNY), the computer can already predict the path of a typhoon or a volcanic eruption with remarkable precision.
I find this statement extremely hard to believe.
That is insanity! lol Can it predict a persons date of death as well?

heh how about one to predict what a women thinks 😉

That would fry any computer 😉
 
heh how about one to predict what a women thinks 😉

Impossible, as soon as the computer predicted what women think, it would have to start over again because it changed completely. 🙂

 
My laptop has a theoretical peak speed of about 7.5 Gigaflops.
Each of the 5,120 vector processors in the "Earth Simulator" are capable of 8 GFlops (not exactly spectacular floating-pont performace). But the people at NEC have the brains to realize that clustering is not the way to go when designing a supercomputer. Clusters lack memory bandwidth and thusly do a poor job at actualizing theoretical floating-point performance.
 
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Operator: So HAL, what will the weather be like to today?

HAL:: It will be windy in Chicago, it will rain in Northern Brazil, and Stalingrad will be cold.

Operator: You suck, HAL! There is no way I'm paying millions for a piece of junk. I'm returning you tommorow!

HAL: I'm affraid I can't let you do that Bob.



ROTFLOL! That's a good one 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Vespasian
My laptop has a theoretical peak speed of about 7.5 Gigaflops.
Each of the 5,120 vector processors in the "Earth Simulator" are capable of 8 GFlops (not exactly spectacular floating-pont performace). But the people at NEC have the brains to realize that clustering is not the way to go when designing a supercomputer. Clusters lack memory bandwidth and thusly do a poor job at actualizing theoretical floating-point performance.

so the question begs, how will the 100 TF and 360 TF Super comps IBM will be building be 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Adul
Originally posted by: Vespasian
My laptop has a theoretical peak speed of about 7.5 Gigaflops.
Each of the 5,120 vector processors in the "Earth Simulator" are capable of 8 GFlops (not exactly spectacular floating-pont performace). But the people at NEC have the brains to realize that clustering is not the way to go when designing a supercomputer. Clusters lack memory bandwidth and thusly do a poor job at actualizing theoretical floating-point performance.

so the question begs, how will the 100 TF and 360 TF Super comps IBM will be building be 🙂
ASCI Purple (100 TFlops) will be a monstrous cluster of Power5 servers. But the other one (Blue Gene/L) will be shared-memory system that has something like 65,000 low-watt embedded processors.

EDIT: Make that 130,000 low-watt embedded processors.
 
Back
Top