Fastest 2003 cards at xbit labs

[cindy22]

ATI

and

nvidia

 

[McArra]

Very nice review.

 

[BoomAM]

Good find.
While theres no doubt that "nvidiots" will complain about the conclusions for the cards;

This way, we can conclude that graphics adapters based on NVIDIA GPUs are more suitable for:
--Professional gamers caring more about high fps rates rather than image quality;
--Those who are not interested in the next generation games;
--NVIDIA products fans
--Those who work with professional 3D applications.

The graphics solutions based on VPUs from ATI Technologies are more suitable for:
--Those who want to play with the highest image quality;
--Those who are following the progress in the computer games industry;
--Those who value the quietness.

I find the above to be true. Without bias, i can confidently say that i wholehartadly agree with the statments.

 

[McArra]

I do too.

 

[videoclone]

How old r u cindy?

 

[Richdog]

Originally posted by: videoclone
How old r u cindy?

lol Videoclone is in virtual love... awwww...

 

[Keysplayr]

Originally posted by: BoomAM
Good find.
While theres no doubt that "nvidiots" will complain about the conclusions for the cards;

This way, we can conclude that graphics adapters based on NVIDIA GPUs are more suitable for:
--Professional gamers caring more about high fps rates rather than image quality;
--Those who are not interested in the next generation games;
--NVIDIA products fans
--Those who work with professional 3D applications.

The graphics solutions based on VPUs from ATI Technologies are more suitable for:
--Those who want to play with the highest image quality;
--Those who are following the progress in the computer games industry;
--Those who value the quietness.

I find the above to be true. Without bias, i can confidently say that i wholehartadly agree with the statments.

My only complaint is that you have no regard for saying something like that.

 

[Keysplayr]

The real battle is under 4 months away Cindy. Enjoy ATI's lead while you are able. I'm not saying I know what will happen as no one can. But I can tell you it's going to be a brawl and a half. So, enjoy.

 

[nRollo]

Videoclone:You know Cindy, I think nVidia sux too. Maybe we could catch a movie, you know, and talk about how they suck?
Cindy: Sorry Video, my real name is Joe.
Videoclone:

 

[jim1976]

Good conclusions. Nice one Cindy.
Stops talkin..Doesn't want to start a flame war

 

[Insomniak]

Originally posted by: BoomAM
Good find.
While theres no doubt that "nvidiots" will complain about the conclusions for the cards;

This way, we can conclude that graphics adapters based on NVIDIA GPUs are more suitable for:
--Professional gamers caring more about high fps rates rather than image quality;
--Those who are not interested in the next generation games;
--NVIDIA products fans
--Those who work with professional 3D applications.

The graphics solutions based on VPUs from ATI Technologies are more suitable for:
--Those who want to play with the highest image quality;
--Those who are following the progress in the computer games industry;
--Those who value the quietness.

I find the above to be true. Without bias, i can confidently say that i wholehartadly agree with the statments.

Yeah, that's pretty much dead on.

If I were buying right now though, It'd still be Nvidia though

I still don't trust ATi. I have a friend who has owned all ATi cards, and I have yet to see a driver release that he hasn't had trouble with.

Anyway, the two companies are pretty much dead even right now, they just have their strengths in different areas.

 

[videoclone]

From all other posts Cindy has proved to be a flamer with accusations of cheating and so on i just want to find out how old this extremely annoying forum member is for curiosities sake.

 

[Zephyr106]

I still don't trust ATi. I have a friend who has owned all ATi cards, and I have yet to see a driver release that he hasn't had trouble with.

Well as a current ATI user I have to say that I have had the opposite experience. Just a few image discrepencies, flickering kind of things, in a game or two, and the Cat 3.7s caused Jedi Knight 3 to lock up sometimes on game loads. I think problems with driver releases depend more on individual motherboard, OS situations than any inherent, universal flaw or shortcoming in the drivers.

Zephyr

 

[videoclone]

Lets just say both Videocards suck because in about 3 months they will once the NEW CORES get here

Remember everyone these new videocards NV40 and R420 are not updated versions of the old cores they are all new from the ground up .. well the R420 use's some trademarks from the ATI9800 that made it so good! but the R420 is all new as well as NV40

These will blow away there 1 year old counterparts. and from then on they will be tweaked up just like the NV30 ( FX5800 ) and R300 ( ATI9700 ) got tweaked up to the FX5950 and the ATI9800XT.

Fingers crossed these cards perform identical because if they do price will be the only factor setting them apart and in the end those price's come down and WE WIN !!!!!

 

[Rogodin2]

Only one out of the two nvidia pros are valid-if you are a 3d graphics pro then use nvidia-speed is even with both-IQ is much better with ATI-women take off their thongs when you wear your ati t-shirt-and if you skate on a nvidia board dogs defecate on you=I take ati

Invalid conclusion+pagefault=Nvidia.

rogo

I love prodding the heffers (ostensibly forum males)-where is ginfest that foul beast

rogo

 

[Pete]

(I think neither the R420 nor the NV40 will be "new from the ground up," mainly because they don't need to be. I believe both will be much-tweaked versions of the 9800 and 5900, in keeping with their jump from DX9 PS/VS 2.0 to PS/VS 3.0 support.

R500 and NV50 should be bigger leaps.)

 

[slpavman]

Well, I've been running an MSI Ti4200 (tweaked to 4600 speeds) for the last year and a half ... but I ordered an ATI Radeon 9800 Pro from Newegg and I can hardly wait! Both companies have produced outstanding cards at times ... it's just the NOW happens to be one of ATI's "times".

 

[JBT]

Originally posted by: Rollo
Videoclone:You know Cindy, I think nVidia sux too. Maybe we could catch a movie, you know, and talk about how they suck?
Cindy: Sorry Video, my real name is Joe.
Videoclone:

LOL!!!

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: BoomAM
Good find.
While theres no doubt that "nvidiots" will complain about the conclusions for the cards;

This way, we can conclude that graphics adapters based on NVIDIA GPUs are more suitable for:
--Professional gamers caring more about high fps rates rather than image quality;
--Those who are not interested in the next generation games;
--NVIDIA products fans
--Those who work with professional 3D applications.
--Those who like their games to work the 1st time every time and not waiting for "hotfixes" to come along to play their new games
--Those who use OpenGL
--Those who use any operating system other than Windows

The graphics solutions based on VPUs from ATI Technologies are more suitable for:
--Those who want to play with the highest image quality;
--Those who are following the progress in the computer games industry;
--Those who value the quietness.
--Those who like to go with the underdog

I find the above to be true. Without bias, i can confidently say that i wholehartadly agree with the statments.

I made a few corrections to make it a little more accurate. And the IQ argument is moot, NVIDIA has superior AF, ATi has superior AA.

As for my underdog comment, it basically says this. If ATi didnt exsist, many of you would be XGI fanbois just to hate on the leader. Just like the "linux rules" crowd. Ironically, ATi drivers for linux are horrible

Edit: and not only is that article written like a 16 year old was at the keyboard, but there are straight up lies in plain sight. "As a result, the performance of GeForce FX based solutions in the next generation games such as Doom III" the FX5600 Ultra will compete with the R9800XT 256MB in doom3, its open GL, ATis horrible horrible weak spot.

here's an open gl game you might've heard of

 

[BoomAM]

Originally posted by: keysplayr2003

Originally posted by: BoomAM
Good find.
While theres no doubt that "nvidiots" will complain about the conclusions for the cards;

This way, we can conclude that graphics adapters based on NVIDIA GPUs are more suitable for:
--Professional gamers caring more about high fps rates rather than image quality;
--Those who are not interested in the next generation games;
--NVIDIA products fans
--Those who work with professional 3D applications.

The graphics solutions based on VPUs from ATI Technologies are more suitable for:
--Those who want to play with the highest image quality;
--Those who are following the progress in the computer games industry;
--Those who value the quietness.

I find the above to be true. Without bias, i can confidently say that i wholehartadly agree with the statments.

My only complaint is that you have no regard for saying something like that.

Why?
Whats the matter? Cant accept someones opinion?

 

[Jeff7181]

My dad can beat up your dad.

 

[Richdog]

Originally posted by: videoclone
From all other posts Cindy has proved to be a flamer with accusations of cheating and so on i just want to find out how old this extremely annoying forum member is for curiosities sake.

Well I think she has the best of intentions no doubt. But still I agree that all of her posts seem to revolve around the same thing - either direct comparisons of Nvidia/ATI... or the-now-very-lame cheating issue. Cindy how about starting to provide intelligent arguments? Or maybe even venturing YOUR OWN opinion once in a while? For credibility's sake y'see...:beer:

 

[Keysplayr]

Originally posted by: BoomAM

Originally posted by: keysplayr2003

Originally posted by: BoomAM
Good find.
;

This way, we can conclude that graphics adapters based on NVIDIA GPUs are more suitable for:
--Professional gamers caring more about high fps rates rather than image quality;
--Those who are not interested in the next generation games;
--NVIDIA products fans
--Those who work with professional 3D applications.

The graphics solutions based on VPUs from ATI Technologies are more suitable for:
--Those who want to play with the highest image quality;
--Those who are following the progress in the computer games industry;
--Those who value the quietness.

I find the above to be true. Without bias, i can confidently say that i wholehartadly agree with the statments.

My only complaint is that you have no regard for saying something like that.

Why?
Whats the matter? Cant accept someones opinion?

This is an opinion: While theres no doubt that nvidia users will complain about the conclusions for the cards.

This is a rank out: While theres no doubt that "nvidiots" will complain about the conclusions for the cards.

Got it?

You are welcome for the lesson. No need to thank me.

 

[cindy22]

"Very nice review. "

I agree ,McArra

"Good find.
While theres no doubt that "nvidiots" will complain about the conclusions for the cards;"

THANKS!

"How old r u cindy? "

I'm 22

"The real battle is under 4 months away Cindy. Enjoy ATI's lead while you are able. I'm not saying I know what will happen as no one can. But I can tell you it's going to be a brawl and a half. So, enjoy. "

I hope so ,I just love new and future technologies

"my real name is Joe.(rollo)"

hi joe!

"Good conclusions. Nice one Cindy.
Stops talkin..Doesn't want to start a flame war "

THANKS ,jim1976

 

[Insomniak]

Originally posted by: Jeff7181
My dad can beat up your dad.

My mom can beat up your dad.