Fast and The Furious vs. Gone in 60 Seconds

CuriousAndy

Banned
May 28, 2001
1,563
0
0
I've already seen Gone in 60sex.. It was an ok movie.. simply entertaining yet nothing impressive. I'm not really into cars I guess..

How's FATF par up compared to Gi6S? I guess they both are car/chick movie (although there is no mentionable chick in FATF) I'm reluctant to see it.. My friend really enjoyed it and says: It was action packed however, Gi6S was better overall and FATF had a very loose, horrible ending..

What do u think?

~andy
 

Gibson486

Lifer
Aug 9, 2000
18,378
2
0
No offense, but is it that hard to put down the whole name instead of those initials (Gi6s, FATF)?
 

CuriousAndy

Banned
May 28, 2001
1,563
0
0
yea.. u try re-typing my original thread with typing out full name for everytime the title is being mentioned..

;)

~andy
 

CattyKathy

Golden Member
Apr 22, 2001
1,732
0
0
Gi6S has Angelina Jolie for the guys, FATF was just awesome cuz Vin Diesel is in it, just the part where he lifted his chick to do, well, ya know, just gave me chill, he's just so sexy :p
 

mztykal

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2000
6,709
48
91
Dude, FATF RAPED Gone in 60 Seconds. Nick Cage stood no chance! Vin Diesel fvcked him up. :)
 

CuriousAndy

Banned
May 28, 2001
1,563
0
0
I didn't even recognize Angelina Jolie in Gone in 60 Seconds until Tomb Raider came out..

I thought she was fugly in Gi6S.. In Tomb Raider, she does look better but she doesn't hold my attention for me..

What other movies has she done before Tombraider and Gi6S?

~andy
 

Noriaki

Lifer
Jun 3, 2000
13,640
1
71
The Fast and the Furious is much more fun to watch.

Gone in 60 is alright, but no where near as fun as Fast and Furious.

67GT500 vs 70Charger....tough call.

But the rest of the cars in the Fast and the Furious were much much cooler than the rest in Gone in 60.

Plus it was just more fun. Better action, kept the adreniline up better.

I estimate I will see this movie 4 times in the theatre ;)
 

C'DaleRider

Guest
Jan 13, 2000
3,048
0
0
Angelina Jolie has been in several movies, including:

Girl, Interrupted

Hackers

Pushing Tin

The Bone Collector

Playing God


and the ever-popular Cyborg 2
 

CattyKathy

Golden Member
Apr 22, 2001
1,732
0
0


<< Angelina Jolie has been in several movies, including:

Girl, Interrupted

Hackers

Pushing Tin

The Bone Collector

Playing God


and the ever-popular Cyborg 2
>>



Also her old OLD movies :

Gia
Foxfire (that was a good movie)
 

ISAslot

Platinum Member
Jan 22, 2001
2,888
107
106
Gone in 60 Sec. is not as good IMO.

The camera angles, and the small time the camera stays in one spot, in Gone in 60 Sec. often confuse points of reference.

Much better done in the fast and the furious.

 

mynameismatt

Member
Jun 5, 2001
34
0
0
I have to say that both gone in sixy secs and the fast and the furious were great movies. But the fast and the furious had better car chase scenes and more action. I liked the fast and the furious a lot more than gone in sixty secs it got the testosterone flowing pretty good. And to whoever said there is no mentionable girls in the fast and the furious, HELLO! Jordana Brewster. Anyway thats my two cents.
 

Noriaki

Lifer
Jun 3, 2000
13,640
1
71


<< << 67GT500 vs 70Charger >>

no contest... GT500.
>>

yeah I'd take the GT500 to. Especially if it has the 427 V8 (the race engine, rather than the 428 street engine).


But the rest of the cars in the fast and the furious were nicer than the rest of the cars in Gone in 60.

Well yeah Ferraris and stuff....but they don't really show them much, and what can I say, I'm a sucker for good performance mods :D (though I hate it when people put big exhaust tips and stickers on their gutless civics).
 

BuckMaster

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
3,260
0
0
I ve been wanting to go see the &quot;Fast and The Furious&quot;. I might go see it next week when Im out of town working. I went and seen Mummy II last time out of town and thought it was MUCH better then Mummy I.
 

Atlantean

Diamond Member
May 2, 2001
5,296
1
0
The fast and the furious was way better, it had a better plotline and it was more entertaining
 

Noriaki

Lifer
Jun 3, 2000
13,640
1
71


<< it had a better plotline >>

WHAT THE HELL??? LOL!!! That movie is a good solid 2 / 10 for Plot/Story. No story whatsoever. LOL!!!



<< and it was more entertaining >>

Yes it was definately a lot of fun to watch. Absolutely zero story though.
 

kenthuang

Senior member
Apr 30, 2001
261
0
0
I think Gone in 60 Sec has a better taste in cars. And Fast and the Furious is a tasteless movie for speedsters wannabes.
 

Soybomb

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2000
9,506
2
81
Please, don't try to pretend that either movie had a plot. WTH was with the guy and his wood fetish in 60 seconds anyway? I liked gone in 60 seconds, not only do you get cage who is just cool (whats this vin diesel guy anyway) but you get a cool cast too with hottie jolie, the black dude who was just cool, and the bad ass guy who played sphinx. It was a fun movie, filled with cool cars and some fun chase scenes.
 

EvanFerguson

Banned
May 14, 2001
956
0
0
I have seen the fast and the furious but I've seen gone in 60 secs......it's pretty decent, though maybe if they'd show the damn xj-220 some more! Anyone notice that they got the car really early in the boosting but crossed it off the list like 30 mins later? Eh eh? Proly not, ah well :p


Gone in 60 seems to be better imo, wasn't too bad of a story

ALTHOUGH, why didn't the cops just show up at the chop shop? lol
 

LordMaul

Lifer
Nov 16, 2000
15,168
1
0


<< Dude, FATF RAPED Gone in 60 Seconds. Nick Cage stood no chance! Vin Diesel fvcked him up. :) >>



Cage kicks ass.

Whoever it was, he lost. ;)
 

LAUST

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2000
8,957
1
81
Mad Max!! Falcon Coupe with a Weiand ontop of that 351..!! He'd take em both :)