Falklands War part 2?

[WelshBloke]

I agree with Argentina's claims.

Any particular ones?

 

[Nebor]

I agree with Argentina's claims.

And you don't care that the UK would happily give the islands away, and has tried to, but the residents of the island want to remain British?

 

[RabidMongoose]

Any particular ones?

All of them, essentially the aggregate wins out.

 

[WelshBloke]

And you don't care that the UK would happily give the islands away, and has tried to, but the residents of the island want to remain British?

At this point I'm guessing Rabidmoose has just discovered where Argentina's claim starts and as hes very much against colonialism hes going to find it hard to justify.

 

[RabidMongoose]

And you don't care that the UK would happily give the islands away, and has tried to, but the residents of the island want to remain British?

They can be awarded dual British-Argentinian citizenship. Thus, the people can remain British.

 

[WelshBloke]

All of them, essentially the aggregate wins out.

The aggregate?

You dont have a clue what your talking about do you?

 

[Nebor]

They can be awarded dual British-Argentinian citizenship. Thus, the people can remain British.

Even though they don't want that. They overwhelmingly support absolutely no change to their sovereignty.

 

[Nebor]

The aggregate?

You dont have a clue what your talking about do you?

Yeah, he's an idiot. I wonder how many other forums he trolls with anti-UK nonsense.

 

[CallMeJoe]

All of them, essentially the aggregate wins out.

What does gravel have to do with territorial claims?

Aggregate

 

[Nebor]

What does gravel have to do with territorial claims?

Aggregate

The islands must be rich with it! That's why RabidMongoose wants the Argentinians to seize them!

 

[CallMeJoe]

The islands must be rich with it! That's why RabidMongoose wants the Argentinians to seize them!

I suppose the aggregate would add some weight to their claim...

 

[RabidMongoose]

The aggregate?

You dont have a clue what your talking about do you?

The aggregate of the claims. Yes, I know what I'm talking about.

Do you not know what aggregate means?

Not sure how I can help you out here. This is pretty simple stuff.

 

[RabidMongoose]

What does gravel have to do with territorial claims?

Aggregate

I didn't mention anything about gravel. You did.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/aggregate can probably help you out if you have no idea what aggregate means.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Even though they don't want that. They overwhelmingly support absolutely no change to their sovereignty.

I don't believe that's the sole determination.

If Argentina landed 10,000 Argentinians onto UK territory, then would you let them take UK land that they are on and bring it under Argentinian control if they so desired? Of course not.

 

[CallMeJoe]

I didn't mention anything about gravel. You did.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/aggregate can probably help you out if you have no idea what aggregate means.

Aggregate is filler used in paving materials, typically gravel and sand. Any good asphalt or concrete worker knows this.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Aggregate is filler used in paving materials, typically gravel and sand. Any good asphalt or concrete worker knows this.

I'm not sure if you realize this, but words have many meanings. Aggregate has many meanings.

 

[MotF Bane]

What is Venezuela going to provide? Moreover, most of South America and the Caribbean is behind Argentina in regards to bilateral talks. Why do you think they have instituted a blockade on ships from the Malvinas?

Then it is the South American nations who are pushing for a war, while you cheer for them, warmonger.

 

[CallMeJoe]

...If Argentina landed 10,000 Argentinians onto UK territory, then would you let them take UK land that they are on and bring it under Argentinian control if they so desired? Of course not.

Isn't that essentially what you are advocating for the Falklands?

 

[Nebor]

I don't believe that's the sole determination.

If Argentina landed 10,000 Argentinians onto UK territory, then would you let them take UK land that they are on and bring it under Argentinian control if they so desired? Of course not.

I think whichever country can militarily hold a piece of land gets to keep it until someone comes along to take it from them. It's a pretty simple concept. Applies equally well to Israel as it does the Falkland Islands.

 

[CallMeJoe]

I'm not sure if you realize this, but words have many meanings. Aggregate has many meanings.

I'm not sure if you realize this, but mockery can take many forms.

 

[KMFJD]

CoG has trolled everyone for 12 pages, impressive

 

[RabidMongoose]

Isn't that essentially what you are advocating for the Falklands?

No. I'm not advocating for violence.

 

[RabidMongoose]

I'm not sure if you realize this, but mockery can take many forms.

Please don't troll and derail this thread. Please stick to the issue of the Malvinas. Thanks.

 

[CallMeJoe]

Please don't troll and derail this thread.

Sorry. I was just trying to follow your example from the "Canada's Queen" thread.

Please stick to the issue of the Malvinas. Thanks.

May I discuss the Falklands, instead?

 

[Nebor]

Please don't troll and derail this thread. Please stick to the issue of the Malvinas. Thanks.

WTF are the Malvinas? Is that dago talk for the Falklands? Or are we talking about different things here?