• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

[Fake] [OCN forums] Kaveri 7850K @ 4.9GHz Cinebench score ???

Status
Not open for further replies.
AtenRa

AtenRa

Lifer
Caution, it may be fake.

For comparison, A10-6800K @ 5GHz+ scores from hwbot.org. Highest 6800K at 5100MHz score is 403cb. Kaveri at 4.9GHz scores 547cb according to the pic below.

809f06c7_1387129105752.jpeg


Edit: Sorry forgot the source link

http://www.overclock.net/t/1404574/steamroller/2120#post_21396186
 
Last edited:
hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_r15/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_2826#start=0#interval=20

See that 2826? How do you look up that processor number on hwbot?
 
I already posted but maybe nobody saw it... The score is not valid, it's a fake if you like that word better.
There is no point discussing this.
 
How is the score not valid? Dont say its not valid because its fake. Dont invoke circular logic.
 
inf64 said:
I already posted but maybe nobody saw it... The score is not valid, it's a fake if you like that word better.
There is no point discussing this.
Click to expand...

we're going to keep discussing to bruise your ego.

or really we want to talk about possible kavari scores... :wub:

you, shintaDK, blackened and bella always thread crap and start drama for no reason. gets really old.
 
sm625 said:
How is the score not valid? Dont say its not valid because its fake. Dont invoke circular logic.
Click to expand...
It's not circular logic. I don't see why you cannot understand that invalid means "not a valid score for Kaveri". That comes from the fact that the image itself is fake/not genuine/doctored/insert whatever description you like.

My point is you should stop discussing the irrelevant stuff.

@ Unoid

Really? I'm giving you information right there and you basically take a dump on me. Thanks.

Go ahead, live in a dream and discuss the BS c15 score some kid make in 5 minutes.
 
inf64 said:
the image itself is fake/not genuine/doctored/insert whatever description you like.
Click to expand...

I do not want to insert whatever description I would like. I want to know, specifically, what exactly is doctored or faked or not genuine about that image. Do you have any facts or evidence that proves it is hacked? Is there a text string being shown that is not contained within the program? Is the positioning of text demonstrably in the wrong position? What?
 
How about the score itself? I don't know what's doctored,in what software, how etc. I frankly don't care how it was done as it doesn't really matter.
But I told you in front so you don't waste your time.
 
So you dont know what is doctored, and dont care, because you "just know" its fake. So you admit this knowledge is faith based. Well jeez that's all you needed to say.
 
I seriously doubt now you can read properly. The score of Kaveri is not true. You want me to be more specific? The score of Kaveri at the clock of 4.9Ghz(clockspeed is another matter altogether but let's don't go there) is different from what that image shows. Tell me if you understand or should I make it more clear.
 
He got it finally, hooray!
Bad news is there is no performance news, even for iGPU. Unless you count BF4 SP in-doors walk trough.
 
inf64 said:
I seriously doubt now you can read properly. The score of Kaveri is not true. You want me to be more specific? The score of Kaveri at the clock of 4.9Ghz(clockspeed is another matter altogether but let's don't go there) is different from what that image shows. Tell me if you understand or should I make it more clear.
Click to expand...

So, have you tried overclocking engineering sample? How well it clocked for you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top