I have a co-worker who is skeptical that current employees of Intel are truly frequent contributors to the content of FACEIntel.com. He claims that the people who run the site could very well be disgruntled ex-employees, anti-Intel zealots, AMD fans, etc. posing as current employees...
Now obviously some of the content COULD be "fake"... i.e. written by people who have a vested interest in damaging Intel's reputation with false information. But I find it hard to believe that the entire FACEIntel.com site is purely anti-Intel propoganda without any truth to it, and I think it's unrealistic to think that ALL the content written by current Intel employees is fabricated.
So does anyone know of any articles, or anything on the web, that is evidence of FACEIntel.com's authenticity? Anyone know how the insider-accounts at the site are verified? Or anything else that would suggest one way or another how much of the FACEIntel site is written by the people claiming to write it?
Now obviously some of the content COULD be "fake"... i.e. written by people who have a vested interest in damaging Intel's reputation with false information. But I find it hard to believe that the entire FACEIntel.com site is purely anti-Intel propoganda without any truth to it, and I think it's unrealistic to think that ALL the content written by current Intel employees is fabricated.
So does anyone know of any articles, or anything on the web, that is evidence of FACEIntel.com's authenticity? Anyone know how the insider-accounts at the site are verified? Or anything else that would suggest one way or another how much of the FACEIntel site is written by the people claiming to write it?
Facebook
Twitter