- Feb 5, 2010
- 8,793
- 5
- 76
F1 2010 ruined it for me. Not sim-like enough IMO. Codemasters had enough access to data to make it more sim-like (and have an "arcade" option), but they didn't.
F1 2010 ruined it for me. Not sim-like enough IMO. Codemasters had enough access to data to make it more sim-like (and have an "arcade" option), but they didn't.
F1 2011 is pretty damn realistic.
Codemasters doesn't make sims. Or did they at one point, and I just don't realize it?
DL'd the demo. Is it just me, or does this game look bad.....I mean, REALLY bad. The demo reminded of something reminiscent of a F2P title.
After playing something like Shift2, this game looks like it belongs on a PS2.
...get your eyes checked?
I've played a few games....I'm sure you have too. No need for insults.
I just found the game to be very ugly, with some pretty awful lighting and (lack) of attention to detail.
I was actually pretty surprised, since the other Codemasters games I've played the hell out of (GRID, DIRT series) look very nice by comparison.
My apologies; I haven't played the 2012 demo for myself yet, so I can't exactly give an opinion on how the graphics look.
My question is though, how does it compare to F1 2010 and 2011? How, would you say, does it compare to the screenshot I posted above?
(I'm at work right now, I guess I could just wait an hour til I get home and see for myself. )
Graphically, the game looks good. Nothing amazing, but it's on par with 2010 and 2011... still very good-looking, and certainly no worse than the previous games. Saying that it "belongs on a PS2" is silly. Are you sure we're playing the same game?