-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
F@H: Uhhh i just got a HUGE Work unit downloaded
- Thread starter OverVolt
- Start date
Hmm, I don't see anything listed in either projects page? Are you sure you didn't get a Genome@Home WU? Sometimes those slip through even though you've set your client's preference for F@H WUs. Not to worry, though, TeAm F@H still gets credit. 🙂
BTW, I'm sorry about the lack of stats, but I've been (fruitlessly) waiting on statsman's site to come back. Given that depending on statsman can sometimes be like leaning on a broken reed, I'm probably going to start developing some stats based on data taken directly from Stanford. Since they (Stanford) don't do the extra database work to keep track of weekly and monthly averages and stuff, it may take me a while to bring the stats up to what they used to be (I'm not an expert database designer, by any stretch of the imagination, so it will take me a while to figure this out). Expect something, though possibly minimal, within the next few days.
BTW, I'm sorry about the lack of stats, but I've been (fruitlessly) waiting on statsman's site to come back. Given that depending on statsman can sometimes be like leaning on a broken reed, I'm probably going to start developing some stats based on data taken directly from Stanford. Since they (Stanford) don't do the extra database work to keep track of weekly and monthly averages and stuff, it may take me a while to bring the stats up to what they used to be (I'm not an expert database designer, by any stretch of the imagination, so it will take me a while to figure this out). Expect something, though possibly minimal, within the next few days.
I don't think it is P_332. I got one and it is less than 8 mins per step on mine 2.6C.
[15:09:31]
[15:09:31] *------------------------------*
[15:09:31] Folding@home Gromacs Core
[15:09:31] Version 1.49 (June 23, 2003)
[15:09:31]
[15:09:31] Preparing to commence simulation
[15:09:31] - Looking at optimizations...
[15:09:31] - Created dyn
[15:09:31] - Files status OK
[15:09:31] - Expanded 196964 -> 952909 (decompressed 483.7 percent)
[15:09:31] - Starting from initial work packet
[15:09:31]
[15:09:31] Project: 332 (Run 5, Clone 72, Gen 1)
[15:09:31]
[15:09:31] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[15:09:31] Entering M.D.
[15:09:37] Protein: p332_unf_273
[15:09:37]
[15:09:37] Writing local files
[15:09:37] Extra SSE boost OK.
[15:09:37] Writing local files
[15:09:37] Completed 0 out of 2500000 steps (0)
[15:18:23] Writing local files
[15:18:23] Completed 25000 out of 2500000 steps (1)
[15:27:06] Writing local files
[15:27:06] Completed 50000 out of 2500000 steps (2)
[15:35:52] Writing local files
[15:35:52] Completed 75000 out of 2500000 steps (3)
[15:44:36] Writing local files
[15:44:36] Completed 100000 out of 2500000 steps (4)
OverVolt
Lifer
It's project "p336_unf_337" and yea... it's only a 51 pointer 🙁!!! for some reason it's commin in 2500steps o well!
And J i remember there being a temporary stats site until statsman was back up but i forgot the URL i'll see if i can find the link. It had similar stats for daily producers ect ect.
And J i remember there being a temporary stats site until statsman was back up but i forgot the URL i'll see if i can find the link. It had similar stats for daily producers ect ect.
8min a step for the 332 or 336.....far out! i have one of these atm (the 336) and it is taking me 29:50 per step and thats deadicated folding, ie leaving my pc on overnight. i really need a new cpu.
i cant believe that, no wonder i cant keep up in the stats :brokenheart:
i cant believe that, no wonder i cant keep up in the stats :brokenheart:
As I have posted before (Probably not your problem) if your computer reboots via an error, when it restarts it will take forever to complete a WU that has already been started. However, in my recent attempts to get my P4C 2.4 to 3.5gig I was getting rebooted frwuently. I found that If I do a normal shutdown afterwords the WU times come back down to normal. Another solution (If you don't have too many steps completed) is to delete the work folder and restart.
On another note, last week I had a WU that gave me 70pts.
here's mine, with no background programs running and a XP1700+ with 512MB DDR
Arguments: -advmethods
[05:37:01] - Ask before connecting: No
[05:37:01] - User name: Brian (Team 198)
[05:37:01] - User ID = 50DEDF4B7447314D
[05:37:01] - Machine ID: 1
[05:37:01]
[05:37:01] Loaded queue successfully.
[05:37:01] + Benchmarking ...
[05:37:05]
[05:37:05] + Processing work unit
[05:37:05] Core required: FahCore_78.exe
[05:37:05] Core found.
[05:37:05] Working on Unit 01 [August 20 05:37:05]
[05:37:05] + Working ...
[05:37:06]
[05:37:06] *------------------------------*
[05:37:06] Folding@home Gromacs Core
[05:37:06] Version 1.49 (June 23, 2003)
[05:37:06]
[05:37:06] Preparing to commence simulation
[05:37:06] - Looking at optimizations...
[05:37:06] - Files status OK
[05:37:06] - Expanded 196242 -> 952909 (decompressed 485.5 percent)
[05:37:06]
[05:37:06] Project: 332 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 2)
[05:37:06]
[05:37:06] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[05:37:06] Entering M.D.
[05:37:26] (Starting from checkpoint)
[05:37:26] Protein: p332_unf_273
[05:37:26]
[05:37:26] Writing local files
[05:37:26] Completed 1375000 out of 2500000 steps (55)
[05:37:26] Extra 3DNow boost OK.
[06:08:56] Writing local files
[06:08:56] Completed 1400000 out of 2500000 steps (56)
[06:38:49] Writing local files
[06:38:49] Completed 1425000 out of 2500000 steps (57)
[07:08:39] Writing local files
[07:08:39] Completed 1450000 out of 2500000 steps (58)
[07:38:30] Writing local files
[07:38:30] Completed 1475000 out of 2500000 steps (59)
[08:08:21] Writing local files
[08:08:21] Completed 1500000 out of 2500000 steps (60)
[08:38:11] Writing local files
[08:38:11] Completed 1525000 out of 2500000 steps (61)
[09:08:03] Writing local files
[09:08:03] Completed 1550000 out of 2500000 steps (62)
[09:37:59] Writing local files
[09:37:59] Completed 1575000 out of 2500000 steps (63)
[10:07:52] Writing local files
[10:07:52] Completed 1600000 out of 2500000 steps (64)
I have a p4 2.4c sitting in the next room...my dad just wont let me get on it, otherwise it would be folding for the team.
Orion, thanks for the suggestion, but even from a clean boot it is taking 29mins a frame. I guess the Athlon classic just wasnt cut out for folding.
Orion, thanks for the suggestion, but even from a clean boot it is taking 29mins a frame. I guess the Athlon classic just wasnt cut out for folding.
Insidious
Diamond Member
Similar experience with slowed WUs and a re-boot speeding them back up.
My slowdowns seem to be due to the kids playing CounterStrike. If they don't boot when they are done, I will see 8 minute steps increase to 20 or 20 minutes.
I realize this is not your thing since you said you did re-boot, but maybe it will help others.
-Sid
My slowdowns seem to be due to the kids playing CounterStrike. If they don't boot when they are done, I will see 8 minute steps increase to 20 or 20 minutes.
I realize this is not your thing since you said you did re-boot, but maybe it will help others.
-Sid
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
