I'm working my way through the first ten units to get the bonus points. Haven't done any folding since about 2009.
The way things seem to work now with the bonus points, there's basically no point folding on any old machines, so it seems.
How old is old?there's basically no point folding on any old machines
Tried running an SMP unit on an Athlon X2 @ 2.8 ghz and it was showing 1000 ppd. Laptop (i3 @ 2.2 Ghz) is managing about 3000. Only my main pc is doing anything very useful, about 25k ppd with CPU and GPU. Running a lot hotter and noisier than my usual boinc stuff. Not sure I fancy running like that for a whole month.
Is the goal of the holiday race to try to convert as many friends/family machines over to crunching for the month?
Is it to try to bring back old crunchers to bump up the team for the year's end?
I glanced over last year's thread on the subject, and it seemed like there was some attempt to organize two different teams with all participants being split between the two teams. It also seemed like there was a period where all participants were gauged for a few days or a week, and then once those numbers were in the teams would be finalized and locked trying to keep the teams even based on ppd.
If the teams are largely forced into even playing fields, it would seem to me a big part of the race is really in trying to convert friends/family as opposed to what the machines belonging to the participants can do, since those machines are all intentionally spread out into mostly two even ppd teams.
I guess I'd be interested in playing, but I'd also be interested in the full details, rules, etc. Is this year the same as last year?
but when you are surfing the web and that thing is cranking away... not pleasant.
Or indeed trying to sleep. The rewards for F@H seem to scale very strangely. Because the bonus points are awarded on an exponential curve based on return time there is a disproportionate bias towards a single powerful machine. e.g. one eight core PC is worth much more than two quad core PCs.
It seems somewhat contrary to the idea of distributed computing taking spare cycles on regular desktops. I can understand wanting to give extra incentives to the enthusiasts, but now that the entry requirement for bigadv is 16 cores that seems to eliminate almost everyone.
Or indeed trying to sleep. The rewards for F@H seem to scale very strangely. Because the bonus points are awarded on an exponential curve based on return time there is a disproportionate bias towards a single powerful machine. e.g. one eight core PC is worth much more than two quad core PCs.
It seems somewhat contrary to the idea of distributed computing taking spare cycles on regular desktops. I can understand wanting to give extra incentives to the enthusiasts, but now that the entry requirement for bigadv is 16 cores that seems to eliminate almost everyone.
