F-35 Lightning II Engine Tested - 40,000 lbs thrust

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by fbrdphreak, Sep 22, 2006.

  1. fbrdphreak

    fbrdphreak Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Messages:
    17,557
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Mighty_...htning_2_Engine_Roars_To_Life_999.html

     
  2. Kenazo

    Kenazo Lifer

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2000
    Messages:
    10,429
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm curious to see how things will turn out. I'm suspecting the F-22 will end up in very limited numbers and then this thing will be the main fighter of the first 50 years of the 2000's.
     
  3. drinkmorejava

    drinkmorejava Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2004
    Messages:
    3,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    As a multipurpose, new generation (seventh I think) aircraft, the F-35 is necessary, but the F22, is significantly better suited as an air superiority weapon. The F135's 40,000lbs of thrust is impressive, but considering the F-22 has two F119s at at least 35,000 each, it's really not that overwhelming. The F22 has a faster supercruise at mach 1.7 than the maximum speed of the F35 at mach 1.6. Not to mention the range of the F22 is 2000 miles whereas the F35 is under a thousand. It's also inferred that the F22 has a much faster acceleration due to its engines, but it also handles much better too. Frankly, I'd be scared shitless to be in an F35 and have a raptor after me.
     
  4. iamwiz82

    iamwiz82 Lifer

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2001
    Messages:
    30,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    The F22 also costs 3.5x as F35.
     
  5. Chiller2

    Chiller2 Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2005
    Messages:
    286
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is no way a multipurpose aircraft can fulfill the antitank / ground support role even half as well as the purpose built A-10.But the aircraft does sound cool other than that.
     
  6. bernse

    bernse Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2000
    Messages:
    3,229
    Likes Received:
    0
    Considering the F22 was more designed to be an Air Superiority fighter, that's hardly a surprise.:confused:
     
  7. DurocShark

    DurocShark Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2001
    Messages:
    15,710
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly.

    Plus having the F22 as a completely US developed and owned design has its own benefits.
     
  8. zoiks

    zoiks Lifer

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2000
    Messages:
    11,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bah! I like the F40 better.
     
  9. Demon-Xanth

    Demon-Xanth Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    20,551
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the F35 is going to replace planes like the F16 while the F22 is going to replace planes like the F15 and F18. While thier roles overlap a bit, there is places where eachother excels.

    As far as replacing the A-10, there is no replacing that plane. There was nothing like it before, and there will be nothing like it again. The A-10 will go down in history as the world's only true flying tank.
     
  10. Vic

    Vic Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2001
    Messages:
    39,625
    Likes Received:
    11
    The F-35 is an amazing plane. The X-32 never stood a chance.

    The F-35 will replace the F-16, F/A-18 (which itself replaced the F-14), and Harrier, beginning in 2011.

    The F-22 is the F-15 replacement.
     
  11. FlashG

    FlashG Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 1999
    Messages:
    2,713
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well said