- Oct 9, 1999
- 72,636
- 46
- 91
The F-22 has no competition in the skies right now, unmatched in what it can do. Shame it had to cost so much
The F-22 has no competition in the skies right now, unmatched in what it can do.
Russia is cooking up something which may have similar capabilities.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_PAK_FA
I think the right question is if they have the resources to keep it flyingDoes anyone really believe Russia can do anything right?
Does anyone really believe Russia can do anything right?
The program got you 187 planes (160ish currently)... and likely not a single unit more than that given the f35.
The F-22 has no competition in the skies right now, unmatched in what it can do. Shame it had to cost so much
North of me is an air base and they have been running flights 18 hours a day for about two weeks now as a training engagement. Some people are complaining from the noise, but most are used to it. Jets flying over your house at 1am isn't the normal, usually they stop before 9pm but the past two weeks it has been all hours, especially night training.
The brought the F-22 to the air show in Toronto a couple years ago. For those who don't know the area, it's held right downtown on the waterfront. They got so many complaints from nearby condo owners, it's not welcome back. :awe:
That's the only time I likes my noise.
Does anyone really believe Russia can do anything right?
The F-35 isn't anywhere near an F-22 in performance. The F-22 can cruise at mach 1.8 without even using the afterburner, while the F-35 has a top speed of mach 1.8 with all engines maxed out.
Some other points
F-22A carries twice as many air-to-air missiles as the F-35A
F-22A tactically employs at nearly twice the altitude and at 50% greater airspeed than the F-35A and gives air-to-air missiles a 40% greater employment range and increased lethality and also increases air-to-ground weapons employment range.
F-22A can control more than twice the battle space of the F-35A .F-22 sensors can scan 70,000 square miles in 10 minutes, F-35 31,000 square miles.
F-22A AESA radar has more T/R elements than F-35 radar
F-22 features vectored thrust, giving it twice the maneuverability of an F-35
The F-22 can turn at twice the rate of an F-35
Supercruise expands potential kill zones; half as many F-22s needed as F-35 to cover same area
The only downside to the F-22 is the cost.
Do they use the island airport for that? I flew in there a few times with Porter Airlines. Beats the hell out of driving in from Pearson.
That is where the air show is (general area and stage for the more mundane planes) but an F-22 is not allowed to deploy from a base without arresting gear. The only one equipped was in Trenton (one of our larger air force bases) which they used as a backup but I believe in this case the f-22 came in from across the lake for the show (there is a reserve base in Niagara falls).
My roommate is often part of the crew called to install the arresting gear in the southern Ontario area. I don't recall if he had seen the f-22 in Trenton or was simply there in case it needed to land. The CF-18s all certainly came from Trenton, as did the snowbirds.
Does anyone really believe Russia can do anything right?
I think the right question is if they have the resources to keep it flying
The rest fly out of Pearson. Billy Bishop/Toronto Island is too small for jets. They need a longer runway than prop planes do. A comparable 737 needs about double the runway length as a Dash 8 does.
<--- know squat about planes but does the F35 look exactly identical to the F22 because I remember reading something about the F35 is based off of the F22? I'm not talking about abilities/materials/etc, just the architecture. That said, could you tell from the looks if a fighter is an F22 or F35?
Did you miss an appointment with the optometrist?