F-16 straffs school in New Jersey

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
" The pilot of the single-seat jet was supposed to fire at a target on the ground three and half miles away from school, said Col. Brian Webster, commander of the 177th Fighter Wing of the New Jersey Air National Guard. He does not know what happened that led to the school getting shot up.

The plane was 7,000 feet in the air when the shots were fired. The gun, an M61-A1 Vulcan cannon, is located in the plane's left wing. It fires 2-inch-long bullets that are made of lead and do not explode, said Webster. "


:shocked::shocked::shocked:
 

PanzerIV

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2002
6,875
1
0
Always great when crazy things like this happen when nobody is around when the disaster could have been much worse. Interesting story, Citrix.
 

Glitchny

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2002
5,679
1
0
oh wow whoever was flying that is so dead

First kids with guns and next is gonna be kids in fighter jets
 

TechnoKid

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2001
5,575
0
0
if he was 7,000 feet up, and the intended target was 3 miles away from teh school, its entirely possible the gun was aimed totally wrong? Maybe i'll draw a triangle diagram later.
 

maddogchen

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2004
8,903
2
76
they should not put schools within 20 miles of a live fire target range. Or anything with civilians nearby.
 

Glitchny

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2002
5,679
1
0
Originally posted by: TechnoKid
if he was 7,000 feet up, and the intended target was 3 miles away from teh school, its entirely possible the gun was aimed totally wrong? Maybe i'll draw a triangle diagram later.

I understand what u mean, but still its one hell of a mistake
 

Mik3y

Banned
Mar 2, 2004
7,089
0
0
luckily those rounds werent explosive. otherwise, there'd be 1 ft holes in the ceiling.
 

caivoma

Senior member
Sep 3, 2004
957
0
0
Originally posted by: TechnoKid
if he was 7,000 feet up, and the intended target was 3 miles away from teh school, its entirely possible the gun was aimed totally wrong? Maybe i'll draw a triangle diagram later.



but that is dangerous though, a target about 3 miles away from a school....
 
Aug 25, 2004
11,151
1
81
Originally posted by: maddogchen
they should not put schools within 20 miles of a live fire target range. Or anything with civilians nearby.

:thumbsup: or, they shouldn't put live fire targets near a school
 

Hammer

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
13,217
1
81
Originally posted by: maddogchen
they should not put schools within 20 miles of a live fire target range. Or anything with civilians nearby.

urban sprawl maybe have reached the base
 

DanTMWTMP

Lifer
Oct 7, 2001
15,908
19
81
Originally posted by: Chompman
Must had gone to that school when he was a kid :D

hahaha


well, i'm glad that the damage doesn't seeem TOO bad from the description, and that no one was hurt.
 

Kaervak

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2001
8,460
2
81
LMFAO, I just find this story really damn funny. Thankfully no-one was hurt.
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,754
599
126
Originally posted by: Hammer
Originally posted by: maddogchen
they should not put schools within 20 miles of a live fire target range. Or anything with civilians nearby.

urban sprawl maybe have reached the base

"The range has been used by the military since the end of World War II, long before this area of south Jersey was developed."

Sounds like it. Base was there first, so they decided to build a school next to it.
 

OulOat

Diamond Member
Aug 8, 2002
5,769
0
0
Originally posted by: caivoma
Originally posted by: TechnoKid
if he was 7,000 feet up, and the intended target was 3 miles away from teh school, its entirely possible the gun was aimed totally wrong? Maybe i'll draw a triangle diagram later.



but that is dangerous though, a target about 3 miles away from a school....

The article states that the Air Force was using the range long before the school was built, so I see it as the school's own damn fault for being so close to the range.
 

dnuggett

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2003
6,703
0
76
Originally posted by: maddogchen
they should not put schools within 20 miles of a live fire target range. Or anything with civilians nearby.


Which was there first the school or the range?
 

TitanDiddly

Guest
Dec 8, 2003
12,696
1
0
Originally posted by: Glitchny
its one hell of a mistake


Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: maddogchen
they should not put schools within 20 miles of a live fire target range. Or anything with civilians nearby.


Which was there first the school or the range?


The range. In small towns, the locally elected board of selectmen decides on the location of a school, and then the people vote on it. So it's mostly people who (IMO) aren't qualified to decide exactly how close the school can be to a firing range.
 

OMG1Penguin

Senior member
Jul 25, 2004
659
0
0
Originally posted by: hotchilisauce
Originally posted by: maddogchen
they should not put schools within 20 miles of a live fire target range. Or anything with civilians nearby.

:thumbsup: or, they shouldn't put live fire targets near a school

"The range has been used by the military since the end of World War II, long before this area of south Jersey was developed. "

No, he was right, vice versa.
 

maddogchen

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2004
8,903
2
76
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: maddogchen
they should not put schools within 20 miles of a live fire target range. Or anything with civilians nearby.


Which was there first the school or the range?

quote:
"The range has been used by the military since the end of World War II, long before this area of south Jersey was developed."
range most likely.