Annoys me that all these reviewers get so carried away with their new toy they just gloss over problems, such as fish eye effect (which pcper reviewer called "emulating his peripheral vision" lol). Then there's the fact that bezels aren't accounted for, angle of side monitors aren't accounted for (look at any game with a straight object going from one monitor to the next and watch it "bend"), stuff seems to get closer to you if you rotate (so it looks much father away in centre monitor then when it's on side monitors), hud in the wrong place (e.g. often ammo/health on the far right of the right monitor), for normal windows work you want to use dual view, not stretch (or you end up with a 3 screen wide task bar, maximising some window maxing across all 3 screens not one, etc) eye infinity currently forces you to use stretch. All these things are just wrong.
These reviewers are the same guys that normally tell you how much better something is when you can use some barely noticeable improvement in AA/AF, yet now all of a sudden they don't seem to be able to spot glaring visual defects. Kind of says a lot about the reviewers - show them something new and shiny and they go blind.
I like 3 monitor gaming, but to work correctly it needs a load more effort put it. That is much more likely to happen if people point out the problems.