I guess this is the correct forum area. 😉
I just realized something about these FireWire and USB 2.0 external enclosures. I don't know why I never noticed before. Some are listed at sites that sell them as something like "5.25" external USB 2.0/FireWire enclosure--for CDROM, CDRW, DVD drives". Others state the same thing, but in addition to that, they have added on ".....for CDROM, CDRW, DVD, and 3.5" HDD[/b]". I had one of the typical ME-320 clones with the Prolific chipset (this one made by PPA with the light bar), and it stopped working. NewEgg was good enough to replace it, but has no more and is offering me some others. One of their suggestions was http://www.newegg.com/app/view...=17-155-217&depa=0 and note it does not mention a thing about HD's. This is I think identical to the one I had that went bad, just a different top (and I was using a HD in it). Since the images show the FW ports blocked out, even though the text says it's FW 1394, as we know we can't always rely on NewEgg's text or images, so I mentioned this and he then suggested this one: http://www.newegg.com/app/View...=17-145-360&depa=0 . Note that one also does not mention anything about HD's. When I was looking for possible other alternatives from them (still not realizing some not mentioning HD's), I came across this one: http://www.newegg.com/app/View...=17-146-199&depa=0 since it had better cooling, and note it DOES mention "3.5 IDE drives" (which I take to mean HD's). I just noticed that it mentioned 3.5" IDE drives moments ago when I checked the link again after I read the email reply from Bytecc.....
Since these don't mention chipset, my email to Bytecc was asking about the chipset of the one at that link and also asked about HD size limits. The guy told me that ME-340 from Bytecc uses Ali, but also said it's not for HD's! I then checked out their products page at their site again, better this time, and I see their ME-340 line is listed for only 5.25" ODD (Optical drives)! It's their ME-320's that are ALSO for HD's! My question now (of which I just asked him), is why? I thought all of these external USB2.0/FW external enclosures for IDE devices would work with both ODD's and HDD's, don't they? If not, then why, what is the determining factor? If it's chipset, then that's bad since the chipset is rarely ever mentioned.
(A few weeks back I picked up one of these from Compgeeks sine it was so cheap (reg. $40 and got it for $19) http://www.compgeeks.com/detai...sp?invtid=CDFWCASE-BLK and notice this one even seems to sound like it's only for optical drives, yet I use an IDE HD in it now just fine)!
No telling when Bytecc will reply back, and NewEgg is waiting on a decision by me, so I thought I ask about this here. Any input/info appreciated.
Thanks guys.
I just realized something about these FireWire and USB 2.0 external enclosures. I don't know why I never noticed before. Some are listed at sites that sell them as something like "5.25" external USB 2.0/FireWire enclosure--for CDROM, CDRW, DVD drives". Others state the same thing, but in addition to that, they have added on ".....for CDROM, CDRW, DVD, and 3.5" HDD[/b]". I had one of the typical ME-320 clones with the Prolific chipset (this one made by PPA with the light bar), and it stopped working. NewEgg was good enough to replace it, but has no more and is offering me some others. One of their suggestions was http://www.newegg.com/app/view...=17-155-217&depa=0 and note it does not mention a thing about HD's. This is I think identical to the one I had that went bad, just a different top (and I was using a HD in it). Since the images show the FW ports blocked out, even though the text says it's FW 1394, as we know we can't always rely on NewEgg's text or images, so I mentioned this and he then suggested this one: http://www.newegg.com/app/View...=17-145-360&depa=0 . Note that one also does not mention anything about HD's. When I was looking for possible other alternatives from them (still not realizing some not mentioning HD's), I came across this one: http://www.newegg.com/app/View...=17-146-199&depa=0 since it had better cooling, and note it DOES mention "3.5 IDE drives" (which I take to mean HD's). I just noticed that it mentioned 3.5" IDE drives moments ago when I checked the link again after I read the email reply from Bytecc.....
Since these don't mention chipset, my email to Bytecc was asking about the chipset of the one at that link and also asked about HD size limits. The guy told me that ME-340 from Bytecc uses Ali, but also said it's not for HD's! I then checked out their products page at their site again, better this time, and I see their ME-340 line is listed for only 5.25" ODD (Optical drives)! It's their ME-320's that are ALSO for HD's! My question now (of which I just asked him), is why? I thought all of these external USB2.0/FW external enclosures for IDE devices would work with both ODD's and HDD's, don't they? If not, then why, what is the determining factor? If it's chipset, then that's bad since the chipset is rarely ever mentioned.
(A few weeks back I picked up one of these from Compgeeks sine it was so cheap (reg. $40 and got it for $19) http://www.compgeeks.com/detai...sp?invtid=CDFWCASE-BLK and notice this one even seems to sound like it's only for optical drives, yet I use an IDE HD in it now just fine)!
No telling when Bytecc will reply back, and NewEgg is waiting on a decision by me, so I thought I ask about this here. Any input/info appreciated.
Thanks guys.