Originally posted by: aznium
Originally posted by: fuzzybabybunny
Originally posted by: aznium
LOL @ fuzzy
thanks for all the help guys!
jpeyton.....which cheap manual prime lens would your recommend then?
Thanks for all help again!
Ehhh.. I'd still recommend getting a set of real extension tubes with the electrical contacts. The reason is that you need to be able to stop down the aperture. The manual lenses will allow you to mechanically stop down the aperture, but this will really dim the image that you see through the viewfinder, making focusing very difficult.
eBay extension tubes: $20
Pro Optics: $80
Manual prime: $50? So $50 + $20 is already $70, and you won't be getting autofocus and you'll have to look at a really dim image to focus.
good point . but if im going to spend 200 (80+100) ...... i might as well spend a little more to get a real macro lens? ie. 60mm macro
Well, what exactly is a "real" macro? Is it simply an ordinary lens that has the ability to focus really close so that it can do 1:1 (1x) magnification?
So you buy a 60mm f/2.8 macro.
Compare this to an $80 50mm f/1.8 + $80 ProOptic extension tubes.
To get 1X magnification, the formula is
magnification = extension tube length / focal length
So to get a 1X magnification, you need 50mm worth of extension tubes and a 50mm lens. The ProOptics come with 21mm, 31mm, and 13mm tubes that can be stacked in any order. So the 50mm + 31mm tube + 21mm tube would get you to that 1X magnification.
The extra tubes will decrease the light gathering ability of the lens by about two stops, so 50mm f/1.8 becomes very close to a 50mm f/2.8.
So, 50mm f/1.8 + extension tubes can become close to a 50mm f/2.8 macro lens. For about $160. Plus you can pop off the tubes and use the 50mm f/1.8 by itself if you don't need macro. Or use the tubes on any other lens to allow the lens to focus closer.
The dedicated 60mm f/2.8... you're stuck with f/2.8. You always have the macro ability whether you use it or not. And it's more expensive.