• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical account

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
^ I agree that she is an idiot and that she should go away.

No you don't. If you did, you wouldn't be posting shit about her, especially threads defending her. It's fine that you post but don't lie and state that you want her to go away.
 
As with a great deal of what comes out of the mouths of the right wing, what Sarah said *was not intended to be a factual statement*, but rather an emotional pitch to her base. Now attempting to represent it as *factual* is as scrambled as the original pronouncements.

Or maybe it's just one of those "infinite monkey theory" kinda things, where it just fell a little short of actually making sense... She's got time, so she'll just keep banging out gibberish, hoping that somebody will find it to be profound...
 
:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin: after you post stuff like this all the while telling us that you want her to go away and that she is an idiot. LOL indeed.

One has nothing to do with the other. He doesn't have to like her to show people she was right about something. I know that's a strange concept for some but it can be done.
 
One has nothing to do with the other. He doesn't have to like her to show people she was right about something. I know that's a strange concept for some but it can be done.

I didn't say anything about liking her (obviously, he does), I stated that he said that he wants her to go away and then posts about her and defends her constantly bringing her up. Sure sounds like he want her to go away to me.
 
I didn't say anything about liking her (obviously, he does), I stated that he said that he wants her to go away and then posts about her and defends her constantly bringing her up. Sure sounds like he want her to go away to me.

OK I will ask, Does the truth matter to you?
 
OK I will ask, Does the truth matter to you?

Whether Palin knows about Paul Revere or not? No, I don't give a shit one way or another. I don't know all of the history and don't care if she knows or not. Stupid story from both sides of the aisle.
 
Whether Palin knows about Paul Revere or not? No, I don't give a shit one way or another. I don't know all of the history and don't care if she knows or not. Stupid story from both sides of the aisle.

If you don't care when why the hell are you posting in here. lol
 
1. Assert something contrary to reality
2. Double down when called on it
3. Create a controversy
4. Exploit what is now a two-sided argument
5. Profit

Old tricks are still the best tricks I guess.

This is sig worthy. I try to avoid posting in anything that promotes any sort of publicity for this living publicity stunt. How has the GOP legitimized nominating this fucking idiot? Honestly, WHAT THE FUCK? :|
 
No you don't. If you did, you wouldn't be posting shit about her, especially threads defending her. It's fine that you post but don't lie and state that you want her to go away.
I've defended Wiener and Obama. Right is right, even when you fundamentally disagree with the person on about everything.

Personally I like Palin, but I think it takes some pretty tortured logic to make her statement reasonably accurate. I will say though that I dislike these Boston elites saying "Well, she was accurate, but I think she was lucky rather than informed."
 
PJ's attempt to spin has been topped by others on the web:

They argued 'the people were still British citizens, so he WAS warning the British'.
 
PJ's attempt to spin has been topped by others on the web:

They argued 'the people were still British citizens, so he WAS warning the British'.

He must have galloped through town yelling "We are coming, we are coming".

How did they get it so wrong all this time?
 
If you don't care when why the hell are you posting in here. lol

Reading my posts are self explanatory on why I posted here. Again, PJ posted that he wishes she would go away and yet posts about her keeping her in the news and top of P&N. Can't spell it much more clearly than that for you.
 
Gotta love it. All those elitist liberals, so smug in their knowledge that she's obviously an airhead and plain stupid..... and it turns out that as usual, the elitists are truly the stupid ones and wrong again. 😀 lol @ stupid elitists, it turns out that even the one they so love to deem stupid knows more than they do!
 
One last question . . . .

So. . . . her mistake was that Revere did not, physically, ring a bell?
 
Gotta love it. All those elitist liberals, so smug in their knowledge that she's obviously an airhead and plain stupid..... and it turns out that as usual, the elitists are truly the stupid ones and wrong again. 😀 lol @ stupid elitists, it turns out that even the one they so love to deem stupid knows more than they do!
Nothing smug about knowing what was taught in grammar school. Face it Freeper, she was wrong.
 
Gotta love it. All those elitist liberals, so smug in their knowledge that she's obviously an airhead and plain stupid..... and it turns out that as usual, the elitists are truly the stupid ones and wrong again. 😀 lol @ stupid elitists, it turns out that even the one they so love to deem stupid knows more than they do!

If someone asked you which online forums you visit would your answer be ATP&N or would it sound something like "all of them with a deep appreciation of the media"
 
Back
Top