Exited to experience ray tracing first on the 2080TI

Innokentij

Senior member
Jan 14, 2014
237
7
81
Hey guys! I seen alot of people cry and moan and jump to conclusions but me? I ordered it day 1 after watching the live stream and havent been this amazed since Glide days with voodoo 1 and quake. And yes it is expensive, as in 1500 USD expensive in Norway but hey what else i am gonna do with money? Wait to i die and leave it to the government?

https://imgur.com/a/ytpHyKf
 

DooKey

Golden Member
Nov 9, 2005
1,811
458
136
Enjoy your new card. I know I'm going to enjoy my new 2080 Ti.
 

sze5003

Lifer
Aug 18, 2012
14,182
625
126
I'm curious how it will perform. If you have to drop to 1080p and have 30fps not sure how much it may be worth it. Once benches come out I'll probably have one too but I'm very suspicious of rtx performance on my 1440p monitor.
 

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,592
7,673
136
Use to render raytraced video on my Amiga/toaster/lightwave system. Take hours to render one frame.
 

Brahmzy

Senior member
Jul 27, 2004
584
28
91
Excited for mine too. Not so much RT, but as the first card that can rock 4K60 the right way. Cant wait. Been running 4K since early 2015 and there hasn’t been a single card yet that can do 4K right. I’ll have the first in a few weeks!
 

Headfoot

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2008
4,444
641
126
Im not sure what your definition of "do 4k right" is but an OC 1080 Ti can do 60 fps average many/most games on 4k on high settings. Available since 2017. Generally you may have to drop AA (not that important on 4k anyways) and maybe sometimes AO/HBAO
SsZPdruZvNStBd8yhNB4tF-650-80.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: sze5003

Brahmzy

Senior member
Jul 27, 2004
584
28
91
^^ See that's just it - AA is still absolutely necessary. I've been playing near-field 40-43 4K screens. Think 2-2.5ft. AA will bury a 1080Ti quick. Maybe on those tiny 27" 4K screens you can get away with no AA... I don't do tiny 27" screens.
Tons of benches from all the websites showing 1080Tis struggling @ 4K. This is well-known. Anybody saying anything else doesn't own a 4K screen and/or 1080Ti. The ones that do, have been waiting for the 2080Ti for a long time. And honestly, the MINIMUM FPS should be paid attention to as the dips can have drastic effects on gameplay. There's already info out there showing a massive difference in the 2080Ti's minimum 4K FPS. Huge improvement.

These 2080Tis are a long-time comin'. BOUT TIME!
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
Im not sure what your definition of "do 4k right" is but an OC 1080 Ti can do 60 fps average many/most games on 4k on high settings. Available since 2017. Generally you may have to drop AA (not that important on 4k anyways) and maybe sometimes AO/HBAO
SsZPdruZvNStBd8yhNB4tF-650-80.png
Well, those are average frame rates. We would need to see minimums, I think.
Probably dropping well below 60 at times.
I would guess that the 20 series cards will have higher minimum frame rates.
 

mv2devnull

Golden Member
Apr 13, 2010
1,498
144
106
I seen alot of people cry and moan and jump to conclusions but me?
It does sound like you have jumped to a different conclusion than those people. Only time will tell how that fares. I'd guess you are not prone to the "cry and moan" even if you would miscalculate.
 

PeterScott

Platinum Member
Jul 7, 2017
2,605
1,540
136
It does sound like you have jumped to a different conclusion than those people. Only time will tell how that fares. I'd guess you are not prone to the "cry and moan" even if you would miscalculate.

From what we have seen, RTX cards are delivering a performance boost comparable to most recent generations (not 1000 series which was a bigger boost), and on top of the normal performance boost, you are getting a wealth of new features.

Really it's a great product. IMO that isn't even debatable.

The ONLY issue is pricing, and a lot of that angst is mainly aimed at the 2080Ti, which really takes the place of Titan X in this generation, and thus has no price increase at all. Just a name change.
 

Elfear

Diamond Member
May 30, 2004
7,097
644
126
^^ See that's just it - AA is still absolutely necessary. I've been playing near-field 40-43 4K screens. Think 2-2.5ft. AA will bury a 1080Ti quick. Maybe on those tiny 27" 4K screens you can get away with no AA... I don't do tiny 27" screens.
Tons of benches from all the websites showing 1080Tis struggling @ 4K. This is well-known. Anybody saying anything else doesn't own a 4K screen and/or 1080Ti. The ones that do, have been waiting for the 2080Ti for a long time. And honestly, the MINIMUM FPS should be paid attention to as the dips can have drastic effects on gameplay. There's already info out there showing a massive difference in the 2080Ti's minimum 4K FPS. Huge improvement.

These 2080Tis are a long-time comin'. BOUT TIME!

The rumored performance uptick for the 2080Ti is 35-45% (per Nvidia's Tom Peterson). Will that make the difference in minimum frames to declare the 2080Ti a no compromise 4k card? Guess we'll have to see.

The ONLY issue is pricing, and a lot of that angst is mainly aimed at the 2080Ti, which really takes the place of Titan X in this generation, and thus has no price increase at all. Just a name change.

In the past, we could wait for a 3-6 months and buy a 95% Titan solution in the form of a **80Ti for $600-700. If that happens this go round, you have a point although naming the card would get tricky. I don't see Nvidia selling a further cutdown GT102 card, but who knows.
 

Brahmzy

Senior member
Jul 27, 2004
584
28
91
The rumored performance uptick for the 2080Ti is 35-45% (per Nvidia's Tom Peterson). Will that make the difference in minimum frames to declare the 2080Ti a no compromise 4k card? Guess we'll have to see.
I think it’ll be darn close. The 4K minimum FPS will be much, much better, and that’s what usually makes or breaks playability. Even if with AA FPS averages 50-60FPS, as long as the minimums don’t take dips into the low-40s or even 30FPS territory, we’re good. I think you’ll always have titles with certain sections that struggle and that will remain, but I think it’s going to slay 4K.

Now add DLSS and assuming we get solid future dev support for it, lights out. Now you’re talking 100%+ performance @ 4K.
 

PeterScott

Platinum Member
Jul 7, 2017
2,605
1,540
136
The rumored performance uptick for the 2080Ti is 35-45% (per Nvidia's Tom Peterson). Will that make the difference in minimum frames to declare the 2080Ti a no compromise 4k card? Guess we'll have to see.

That wont' happen for everyone, until it does 4K at 144hz. But it should definitely be no compromise for more people than the 1080Ti.

In the past, we could wait for a 3-6 months and buy a 95% Titan solution in the form of a **80Ti for $600-700. If that happens this go round, you have a point although naming the card would get tricky. I don't see Nvidia selling a further cutdown GT102 card, but who knows.

Valid point for late adopters. But for early adopters that means their card will likely hold it's value longer. They get a longer reward period for being an early adopter.
 

Headfoot

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2008
4,444
641
126
Tons of benches from all the websites showing 1080Tis struggling @ 4K. This is well-known. Anybody saying anything else doesn't own a 4K screen and/or 1080Ti.
Uh, what? The graph with data above disagrees. It doesn't matter what you think is "well known" in a hand wavey subjective sense. OC 1080 Ti does over 60 fps on average at 4k in nearly all modern games per that graph. If you disagree provide proof. I have a 1080 Ti and a 4k 55" TV and it does 4k quite well in all the games I've played on it except Total Warhammer II. I generally just prefer the 144hz screen on my desk vs 60 fps even with the extra resolution

If your definition of "Do 4k Right" means 4k at 120-144hz, then we're definitely not there yet. But we achieved the 60 fps mark last year finally
 

Brahmzy

Senior member
Jul 27, 2004
584
28
91
^^ Like I said, add some AA in there and watch it puke on itself. And that's probably average FPS too - what that doesn't show you is the FPS dipping down into the 30s n 40s at times, wrecking playability.
Try to use some better graphs (pick a bunch - they're all over the place) to prove your point. Plenty of first hand 1080 Ti / 4K owners that say they need more power. Been a well-known fact since the cards released.

NEXT
 

Headfoot

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2008
4,444
641
126
^^ Like I said, add some AA in there and watch it puke on itself. And that's probably average FPS too - what that doesn't show you is the FPS dipping down into the 30s n 40s at times, wrecking playability.
Try to use some better graphs (pick a bunch - they're all over the place) to prove your point. Plenty of first hand 1080 Ti / 4K owners that say they need more power. Been a well-known fact since the cards released.

NEXT
"Well-known fact" ZZT wrong. Provide proof, or its not fact. You repeating 'well known fact' does not transform an opinion into data.
 

killster1

Banned
Mar 15, 2007
6,208
475
126
i imagine this will be the same. if we want to game at over 60fps min we will not be able to enable ray tracing AA shadows etc etc.. With the right settings you can run MOST games over 60fps min with 1080ti,

It would be nice to not have to tweak settings to not have major spikes in the FPS. 1080ti does 4k @ 60fps but not 100% of the time, half the time its going to be 45-50fps in any demanding game.