Executive branch needs to be openly preparing to counter Trump's insurrectionist advocacy in the next 2 months

[Muse]

Interview of national security expert professor.

 

[K1052]

Well there is always the slim possibility that the Supreme Court does us an unfathomable favor tomorrow in the name of executive power.

 

[NWRMidnight]

Well there is always the slim possibility that the Supreme Court does us an unfathomable favor tomorrow in the name of executive power.

After the latest round of rulings by this sham of a SCOTUS, I wouldn't count on them ruling appropriately.

 

[BoomerD]

Nah, the USSC will rightly determine rhat King Donnie was well within his gawd-given rights and has full immunity from any librul attacks over anything.

 

[Moonbeam]

Not to worry. Democrats have all the guns. Any attempt at a violent overthrow will be stopped in it's tracks.

Only stupid people in today's political climate aren't armed and there's nothing stupider than a Trump supporter.

 

[Jaskalas]

Well there is always the slim possibility that the Supreme Court does us an unfathomable favor tomorrow in the name of executive power.

Not sure our current President is able to wield a weapon, in the case of Presidential immunity. Sure would be useful though.

 

[ch33zw1z]

Good luck with that, do it again and no charges if you don’t touch any paperwork

Justices rule for Jan. 6 defendant

This article was updated on June 28 at 4:22 p.m. The Supreme Court on Friday threw out the charges against a former Pennsylvania police officer who entered the U.S. Capitol […]

www.scotusblog.com

 

[Fenixgoon]

Good luck with that, do it again and no charges if you don’t touch any paperwork

Justices rule for Jan. 6 defendant

This article was updated on June 28 at 4:22 p.m. The Supreme Court on Friday threw out the charges against a former Pennsylvania police officer who entered the U.S. Capitol […]

www.scotusblog.com

Supreme insanity. I mean "obstruction of justice" isn't just about paperwork so why would "disrupt an official proceeding" be any different?

 

[ch33zw1z]

Supreme insanity. I mean "obstruction of justice" isn't just about paperwork so why would "disrupt an official proceeding" be any different?

It's not, it just seems more like feelings rulings again.

I mean, it could be bribery, but only if they were paid ahead of time and are a cartoonish villain twirling their handlebar mustache and leaving a note that said "I did it"

 

[zinfamous]

It's not, it just seems more like feelings rulings again.

I mean, it could be bribery, but only if they were paid ahead of time and are a cartoonish villain twirling their handlebar mustache and leaving a note that said "I did it"

ah yes, "the Greenman standard" of legitimate evidence.