Exchange Server is down

tm37

Lifer
Jan 24, 2001
12,436
1
0
No premission.

Came in ealry because I could not log into VPN last night. It is looking at it right now

 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Oh how I miss the fond days of mail stores slamming into the 17 gig barrier and crashing and having to do offline defrags into the wee hours of the morning.

Well...no. I really don't miss that at all.

:p

Crashed mail servers never make for a fun day.
 

iamwiz82

Lifer
Jan 10, 2001
30,772
13
81
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Oh how I miss the fond days of mail stores slamming into the 17 gig barrier and crashing and having to do offline defrags into the wee hours of the morning.

Well...no. I really don't miss that at all.

:p

Crashed mail servers never make for a fun day.

Our Exchange 5.5 database is just a hair over 56GB right now.

:eek:
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Oh how I miss the fond days of mail stores slamming into the 17 gig barrier and crashing and having to do offline defrags into the wee hours of the morning.

Well...no. I really don't miss that at all.

:p

Crashed mail servers never make for a fun day.

Our Exchange 5.5 database is just a hair over 56GB right now.

:eek:

Enterprise? I can't remember if 5.5 had a limit. I was on the Exchange 2000 "Standard" version.
 

iamwiz82

Lifer
Jan 10, 2001
30,772
13
81
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Oh how I miss the fond days of mail stores slamming into the 17 gig barrier and crashing and having to do offline defrags into the wee hours of the morning.

Well...no. I really don't miss that at all.

:p

Crashed mail servers never make for a fun day.

Our Exchange 5.5 database is just a hair over 56GB right now.

:eek:

Enterprise? I can't remember if 5.5 had a limit. I was on the Exchange 2000 "Standard" version.

Yessir

The funny thing is that we only have 117 mailboxes. You cannot enforce mailbox limits when your two top offenders are the head hanchos, though. :p


 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Originally posted by: iamwiz82

Our Exchange 5.5 database is just a hair over 56GB right now.

:eek:

pssst!

That sounds like a lot but there's quite a few mailboxes and they do have limits.

 

Crazee

Elite Member
Nov 20, 2001
5,736
0
76
I have 2,200 users with 4 sites and 9 information stores in an Exchange 2003 environment. We use email archiving to keep our users from killing the databases and just as importantly from using PST files.
 

ryan256

Platinum Member
Jul 22, 2005
2,514
0
71
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Yessir

The funny thing is that we only have 117 mailboxes. You cannot enforce mailbox limits when your two top offenders are the head hanchos, though. :p

I feel your pain. I remember doing an exchange 5.5 to 2000 migration once. Of course the M$ conversion tools didn't work right so we resorted to exporting everything as .pst files and then restoring them to the new 2000 box. Senior partner #1's .pst --- 7.4GB Senior partner #2 --- 11.4GB! :Q
 

iamwiz82

Lifer
Jan 10, 2001
30,772
13
81
Originally posted by: ryan256
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Yessir

The funny thing is that we only have 117 mailboxes. You cannot enforce mailbox limits when your two top offenders are the head hanchos, though. :p

I feel your pain. I remember doing an exchange 5.5 to 2000 migration once. Of course the M$ conversion tools didn't work right so we resorted to exporting everything as .pst files and then restoring them to the new 2000 box. Senior partner #1's .pst --- 7.4GB Senior partner #2 --- 11.4GB! :Q

Our parent company is discussing a move to 2003 right now. I dread it. :p
 

ryan256

Platinum Member
Jul 22, 2005
2,514
0
71
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: ryan256
I feel your pain. I remember doing an exchange 5.5 to 2000 migration once. Of course the M$ conversion tools didn't work right so we resorted to exporting everything as .pst files and then restoring them to the new 2000 box. Senior partner #1's .pst --- 7.4GB Senior partner #2 --- 11.4GB! :Q

Our parent company is discussing a move to 2003 right now. I dread it. :p

Don't worry. Exchange 2k3 migrations from 2000 are much easier! Once the box was installed & configured, data migration was a snap.
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Originally posted by: ryan256
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: ryan256
I feel your pain. I remember doing an exchange 5.5 to 2000 migration once. Of course the M$ conversion tools didn't work right so we resorted to exporting everything as .pst files and then restoring them to the new 2000 box. Senior partner #1's .pst --- 7.4GB Senior partner #2 --- 11.4GB! :Q

Our parent company is discussing a move to 2003 right now. I dread it. :p

Don't worry. Exchange 2k3 migrations from 2000 are much easier! Once the box was installed & configured, data migration was a snap.


Going from 5.5 to 2003 is going to be FUN. I'm no IT person but I hear screams through the waves to know better. 2003 is very good - good as the hardware it needs! At least you will be able to right click! ;)
 

ryan256

Platinum Member
Jul 22, 2005
2,514
0
71
Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Originally posted by: ryan256
Don't worry. Exchange 2k3 migrations from 2000 are much easier! Once the box was installed & configured, data migration was a snap.


Going from 5.5 to 2003 is going to be FUN. I'm no IT person but I hear screams through the waves to know better. 2003 is very good - good as the hardware it needs! At least you will be able to right click! ;)

Ohh... 5.5 to 2K3... um yeah .. then be prepared for .pst hell. I haven't heard of anyone be able to pull of a smooth 5.5 migration yet.
 
Dec 27, 2001
11,272
1
0
Originally posted by: ryan256
Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Originally posted by: ryan256
Don't worry. Exchange 2k3 migrations from 2000 are much easier! Once the box was installed & configured, data migration was a snap.


Going from 5.5 to 2003 is going to be FUN. I'm no IT person but I hear screams through the waves to know better. 2003 is very good - good as the hardware it needs! At least you will be able to right click! ;)

Ohh... 5.5 to 2K3... um yeah .. then be prepared for .pst hell. I haven't heard of anyone be able to pull of a smooth 5.5 migration yet.

I did a 5.5 to 2003 migration.

Migration went well except for some small issue with my AD setup that initially stalled the ForestPrep. It was a full network migration so I was planning to be there all night anyway. :)