- Nov 22, 2001
- 2,806
- 0
- 0
We heard of last minute changes to GTX 480's heatsink. I believe early leaked pics lacked protruding heatpipes. In any case, there are four heatpipes protruding from the cooler which allow for increased fin surface area. To allow for SLI interface clearance however, the the fifth heatpipe is contained within the cooling shroud. In doing so, fin surface area is reduced:
If we examine GTX 470's heatsink, we see all heatpipes are contained within the shroud, which results in a uniform but narrower fin array. Less cooler, but less heat from the GPU. The end result, two cards that offer very similar temp profiles:
It's obvious nVidia knows how to tailor a cooling design. They estabilished some operating temperatures and were able to design two varying coolers which perform as needed. But, could they have done a better job? Could they have lauched cards running in the 80's instead of the 90's?
We know fin surface area plays a major role in heat dissipation. Can anyone conceptualize an air design that would have offered better thermals? With GTX 480, what if the fifth heatpipe were eliminated and the baseplate were extended in that direction to allow thermal transfer to a [full] fin surface area? Crude drawing, too much partying back in the day:
Also worth noting, they opted for a fairly small diameter fan. In general, larger diameter fans can move more air with less rpms and noise. Take a look at the real estate. Could they have used a larger diameter fan and moved more air with the same or less noise?
Finally, a disclaimer. I realize the cards operate at temperatures deemed acceptable by nVidia. No need to post that fact. This is for those who'd like to see one less negative. Power consumption is one thing, 94c is another.


If we examine GTX 470's heatsink, we see all heatpipes are contained within the shroud, which results in a uniform but narrower fin array. Less cooler, but less heat from the GPU. The end result, two cards that offer very similar temp profiles:

It's obvious nVidia knows how to tailor a cooling design. They estabilished some operating temperatures and were able to design two varying coolers which perform as needed. But, could they have done a better job? Could they have lauched cards running in the 80's instead of the 90's?
We know fin surface area plays a major role in heat dissipation. Can anyone conceptualize an air design that would have offered better thermals? With GTX 480, what if the fifth heatpipe were eliminated and the baseplate were extended in that direction to allow thermal transfer to a [full] fin surface area? Crude drawing, too much partying back in the day:

Also worth noting, they opted for a fairly small diameter fan. In general, larger diameter fans can move more air with less rpms and noise. Take a look at the real estate. Could they have used a larger diameter fan and moved more air with the same or less noise?


Finally, a disclaimer. I realize the cards operate at temperatures deemed acceptable by nVidia. No need to post that fact. This is for those who'd like to see one less negative. Power consumption is one thing, 94c is another.