Ex-Gitmo Detainee Details 7+ Year Detention, Torture, Under Bush Regime

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Text

EXCLUSIVE: Recently Released Gitmo Detainee Talks to ABC News
Held Seven Years, Former Aid Worker Tells ABC News He Was Tortured
By JAKE TAPPER, KAREN TRAVERS, and STEPHANIE Z. SMITH

June 8, 2009

For 7½ years, Lakhdar Boumediene was known simply by a number: "10005."

These were the digits assigned to him when he arrived at the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, swept up in a post-Sept. 11 dragnet and accused of plotting to blow up the U.S. and British Embassies in Sarajevo.

In an exclusive interview with ABC News, Boumediene said the interrogators at Gitmo never once asked him about this alleged plot, which he denied playing any part it.

"I'm a normal man," said Boumediene, who at the time of his arrest worked for the Red Crescent, providing help to orphans and others in need. "I'm not a terrorist."

The 43-year-old Algerian is now back with his wife and two daughters, a free man in France after a Republican judge found the evidence against Boumediene lacking. He is best known from the landmark Supreme Court case last year, Boumediene v. Bush, which said detainees have the right to challenge their detention in court.

That decision was a stunning rebuke of the Bush administration's policies on terror suspects. It set up a ruling by District Court Judge Richard Leon, a former counsel to Republicans in Congress appointed to the bench by Bush, that there was no credible evidence to keep Boumediene detained.

After what Boumediene described as a 7½ year nightmare, he is now a free man. Boumediene: "I don't think. I'm sure" about torture.

In 2001, Boumediene, his wife and two young daughters lived in Sarajevo, Bosnia. He worked for the Red Crescent Society, having done stints for the organization in Pakistan and Albania.

He was arrested by Bosnian police in October 2001 and charged with conspiring to blow up the U.S. and British Embassies. He called the charges false and ludicrous.

"They search my car, my office, nothing. Cell phone, nothing. Nothing. Nothing," he said.

The charges were dropped, and the Bosnian courts ordered him and five others freed. But under pressure from the Bush administration, the Bosnian government handed him over to the U.S. military.

On January 17, 2002, Boumediene's hands and feet were placed in shackles, and he was put on a military plane en route to Guantanamo Bay. It was a time of high anxiety, and the Bush administration was taking no chances.

Two weeks later, in his State of the Union address, President Bush touted the arrests in Bosnia to show early progress in the war on terror.

"Our soldiers, working with the Bosnian government, seized terrorists who were plotting to bomb our embassy," Bush said in his address. To this day, officials of the Bush administration have provided no credible evidence to back up that accusation.

Boumediene said the interrogations began within one week of his arrival at the facility in Cuba. But he thought that his cooperation, and trust in the United States, would serve him well and quicken his release.

"I thought America, the big country, they have CIA, FBI. Maybe one week, two weeks, they know I am innocent. I can go back to my home, to my home," he said.

But instead, Boumediene said he endured harsh treatment for more than seven years. He said he was kept awake for 16 days straight, and physically abused repeatedly.

Asked if he thought he was tortured, Boumediene was unequivocal.

"I don't think. I'm sure," he said.

Boumediene described being pulled up from under his arms while sitting in a chair with his legs shackled, stretching him. He said that he was forced to run with the camp's guards and if he could not keep up, he was dragged, bloody and bruised.

He described what he called the "games" the guards would play after he began a hunger strike, putting his food IV up his nose and poking the hypodermic needle in the wrong part of his arm.

"You think that's not torture? What's this? What can you call this? Torture or what?" he said, indicating the scars he bears from tight shackles. "I'm an animal? I'm not a human?"


Vice President Dick Cheney has been adamant in his defense of the Guantanamo detention center and the treatment of those held there.

Last week Cheney said, "The facility down there is a fine facility. These people are very well treated."

Oddly, Boumediene said no one at Gitmo ever asked him about the alleged plot to blow up the embassies in Sarajevo. They wanted to know what he knew about al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, he recounted, which was nothing.

Boumediene said it was in his interest to lie to the interrogators, who would reward the detainees if they admitted guilt.

"If I tell my interrogator, I am from Al Qaeda, I saw Osama bin Laden, he was my boss, I help him, they will tell me, 'Oh you are a good man,'" he said. "But if I refuse ? I tell them I'm innocent, never was I terrorist, never never, they tell me. 'You are, you are not cooperating, I have to punch you.'"

After nearly four years locked up, Boumediene went on a hunger strike to protest his treatment.

He said he had believed that the United States honored religious diversity but believed guards at Guantanamo took actions to disrespect his religious beliefs. "They shaved my beard, because they don't respect me, because the guards they don't let me sleep. They don't let me read my Koran, they don't let me pray normal like people like Muslim outside the Guantanamo," he said.

Boumediene broke his hunger strike just twice over 2½ years -- first, when he learned of Barack Obama's election win and next when Judge Leon ordered his release.

Despite the harsh treatment and uncertainty over his fate, Boumediene said he did not want to die because he had something to live for back home.

"Every day, I think about my wife and my daughters," he said.

Boumediene's personal effects were taken from him at Guantanamo, including his wedding ring. He now has a stack of letters, that his wife wrote to him that never arrived, a "return to sender" stamp on the envelope.

"Over there you lose all the hopes, you lose all hope," he said. "Any good news, they don't want you to be happy."

It took more than six years before Boumediene started to receive good news.

Boumediene v. Bush

Last summer, in a landmark war-time decision, the Supreme Court ruled that terror suspects held at Guantanamo have a constitutional right to challenge their detention in federal court.

The decision was a harsh rebuke to the Bush administration's system for detaining and eventually trying terror suspects.

In a blistering dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia said allowing federal judges, rather than military officials, to release terror suspects could have disastrous consequences.

"The game of bait-and-switch that today's opinion plays upon the nation's commander in chief will make the war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed," he wrote.

Boumediene saw the 5-4 decision as his first victory against President Bush. His second came last November when Judge Leon ruled that the evidence against Boumediene was weak -- a "thin reed," he called it -- and ordered his release from Guantanamo.

The Bush administration never charged him with conspiring to blow up the embassies. Rather they said Boumediene and others had been planning to travel to Afghanistan to fight the United States.

To mark the occasion, Boumediene made himself a T-shirt that, like a soccer scoreboard, reads, "Boumediene: 2, Bush: 0."

Last month, in a tearful ceremony at an airport outside Paris, Boumediene was reunited with his family. His daughters, who were toddlers when he was detained, are 13 and 9 years old.

"I cried, just cried. Because I don't know my daughters," he said. "The younger, when I moved from Bosnia to Gitmo, she had 18 months, only 18 months. Now 9 years. Now she's big. Between 18 months, baby and 9 years, she walking, she's talking, she play, she's joking. It's a big difference."

Because of his hunger strike, Boumediene was not in good health when he arrived in France. He was treated at a military hospital and could not eat regular food at first.

After he was released from the hospital, he went with his wife and daughters to enjoy a first meal as a family in seven and a half year. On the menu? Pizza.

Sarkozy, Obama Work Out Detainee Plan

At the request of the White House, France agreed to take in Boumediene. Obama spoke with French President Nikolas Sarkozy on April 3 in Strasbourg France about the possibility of taking in prisoners released from Guantanamo.

"If then the President of the United States says, I'm going to close down Guantanamo, but I need my allies to take -- in this particular instance, this one person -- into our prisons, because this is going to help me, the U.S. President, to shut down this base -- if we are consistent, then we say, yes," Sarkozy said that day.

But neither the US nor French governments thought Boumediene needed to be imprisoned. He is a free man, trying to figure out what to do next.

Three others from his group are back in Bosnia. Two remain in Guantanamo.

Obama personally thanked Sarkozy on Saturday in France.

"I very much appreciate President Sarkozy's leadership on a whole range of issues," he said, including, "France's willingness to accept a Guantanamo detainee."

Boumediene: "I try to forget Guantanamo"

Boumediene said he understands, to a degree, how the attacks of Sept. 11 prompted strong reactions from the U.S. government.

"The first month, okay, no problem, the building, the 11 of September, the people, they are scared, but not 7 years. They can know whose innocent, who's not innocent, who's terrorist, who's not terrorist," he said.

"I give you 2 years, no problem, but not 7 years."

Boumediene stressed that he has no problem with the American people but could not hide his anger against Bush and other senior administration officials who he called "stupid."

"Myself, I try to forget Guantanamo, I can't forget the four or five people, they are stupid, they are very very stupid. I can't forget them," he said.

Boumediene and his attorney said they are considering a lawsuit against the U.S. government but more importantly, they say, he needs money to survive.

"I think that he needs to have an income paid to him for the rest of his life," said his attorney, Robert Kirsch of the law firm WilmerHale. "His family essentially has been thrown into poverty because of a mistake that we made seven-and-a-half years ago. What he needs is a chance to get back where he would have been."

As for Boumediene's allegations of abuse, the Pentagon said, "Any abuse of detainees is unacceptable. It is against our values, endangers our security and is not tolerated. All credible allegations of abuse are thoroughly investigated and, when substantiated, individuals are held accountable for their actions."
Unreal. This truly blows my mind how the United States under Bush could destroy lives needlessly like this. I can't begin to imagine 7+ years of torture and abuse with no hope in sight and no justice system in place to protect the innocent. Put yourself in this man's shoes, being taken from your family (leaving them in poverty) and accused of something you have zero connection with...how would you feel?
 

BarrySotero

Banned
Apr 30, 2009
509
0
0
Everybody in a prison says they are innocent. Obama also wants to detain people.

"WASHINGTON ? President Obama told human rights advocates at the White House on Wednesday that he was mulling the need for a ?preventive detention? system that would establish a legal basis for the United States to incarcerate terrorism suspects who are deemed a threat to national security but cannot be tried, two participants in the private session said."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05.../politics/21obama.html

If Obo could find a way to use PD on say vets he considers a potential threat I am sure you won't feel so bad about it.


 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Everybody in a prison says they are innocent. Obama also wants to detain people.

"WASHINGTON ? President Obama told human rights advocates at the White House on Wednesday that he was mulling the need for a ?preventive detention? system that would establish a legal basis for the United States to incarcerate terrorism suspects who are deemed a threat to national security but cannot be tried, two participants in the private session said."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05.../politics/21obama.html

If Obo could find a way to use PD on say vets he considers a potential threat I am sure you won't feel so bad about it.


He is the king of renaming a turd a flower and the sheep buying it.

"Preventive detention" :laugh:
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,057
67
91
Originally posted by: BarrySotero

Everybody in a prison says they are innocent.

Does that include you? Why should we believe you? :confused:
 

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Everybody in a prison says they are innocent. Obama also wants to detain people.

"WASHINGTON ? President Obama told human rights advocates at the White House on Wednesday that he was mulling the need for a ?preventive detention? system that would establish a legal basis for the United States to incarcerate terrorism suspects who are deemed a threat to national security but cannot be tried, two participants in the private session said."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05.../politics/21obama.html

If Obo could find a way to use PD on say vets he considers a potential threat I am sure you won't feel so bad about it.

I know you suck at reading comprehension from your other posts here, but you do realize that after 6 years of legal battles, a US federal judge (appointed by a Republican no less), ruled that there was *no* evidence to hold this person. So it's not that he thinks he's innocent, it's the US Court system ruled he was innocent.

So the US locked up and tortured an innocent man for almost 8 years. Does this not bother you?


 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
Originally posted by: GarfieldtheCat
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Everybody in a prison says they are innocent. Obama also wants to detain people.

"WASHINGTON ? President Obama told human rights advocates at the White House on Wednesday that he was mulling the need for a ?preventive detention? system that would establish a legal basis for the United States to incarcerate terrorism suspects who are deemed a threat to national security but cannot be tried, two participants in the private session said."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05.../politics/21obama.html

If Obo could find a way to use PD on say vets he considers a potential threat I am sure you won't feel so bad about it.

I know you suck at reading comprehension from your other posts here, but you do realize that after 6 years of legal battles, a US federal judge (appointed by a Republican no less), ruled that there was *no* evidence to hold this person. So it's not that he thinks he's innocent, it's the US Court system ruled he was innocent.

So the US locked up and tortured an innocent man for almost 8 years. Does this not bother you?

Republicans are moral turds, of course this doesn't bother them.
 

ZeGermans

Banned
Dec 14, 2004
907
0
0
just a reminder that this is fucking horrifying and obama isn't doing jack to stop it other than symbolic gestures and empty promises.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
As a US taxpayer I support compensating this man for the injustice that was done against him by our government under previous administration.
 

ZeGermans

Banned
Dec 14, 2004
907
0
0
for every person at gitmo there's a dozen that have gone through much more horrifying things abroad at our behest.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
This just in - I don't believe liars. Especially when it's the new york slimes reporting it. Every criminal thinks they are innocent.

And LOL! at "they lifted me by my arm pits!!!" Yeah, get up when you are told prisoner or we wouldn't have to do that. Oh the huge manity!

 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
Originally posted by: spidey07
This just in - I don't believe liars. Especially when it's the new york slimes reporting it. Every criminal thinks they are innocent.

This just in, you're a sub human POS
 

ZeGermans

Banned
Dec 14, 2004
907
0
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
This just in - I don't believe liars. Especially when it's the new york slimes reporting it. Every criminal thinks they are innocent.

this just in - you're a fascist
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Phokus
Originally posted by: spidey07
This just in - I don't believe liars. Especially when it's the new york slimes reporting it. Every criminal thinks they are innocent.

This just in, you're a sub human POS

Sorry if logic fails you.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
This just in - I don't believe liars. Especially when it's the new york slimes reporting it. Every criminal thinks they are innocent.

And LOL! at "they lifted me by my arm pits!!!" Yeah, get up when you are told prisoner or we wouldn't have to do that. Oh the huge manity!

So by your logic, everyone is guilty of everything, since only guilty people proclaim their innocence...right?

"You murdered your wife, spidey"

"No I didn't"

"Hah, that's exactly what someone who murdered their wife would say!"

Also, you fail at reading...a judge ruled there was no evidence to hold them. This makes them, wait for it, NOT a criminal.
 

0marTheZealot

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2004
1,692
0
0
spidey07 is basically a fascist's wet dream. Don't question authority, authority is always right, the needs of the state outweigh all other concerns. If this was 1939, he'd be first in line to invade Poland because of his "love" for his country.
 

brownzilla786

Senior member
Dec 18, 2005
904
0
0
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: spidey07
This just in - I don't believe liars. Especially when it's the new york slimes reporting it. Every criminal thinks they are innocent.

And LOL! at "they lifted me by my arm pits!!!" Yeah, get up when you are told prisoner or we wouldn't have to do that. Oh the huge manity!

So by your logic, everyone is guilty of everything, since only guilty people proclaim their innocence...right?

"You murdered your wife, spidey"

"No I didn't"

"Hah, that's exactly what someone who murdered their wife would say!"

Also, you fail at reading...a judge ruled there was no evidence to hold them. This makes them, wait for it, NOT a criminal.

Foot + Mouth = OM NOM NOM
 

TechAZ

Golden Member
Sep 8, 2007
1,188
0
71
After reading this article I thought "there has to be reasons he was being held".....then I read the wikipedia articles on him and his associates. I can't blame the US for holding him for so long. That doesn't mean he was guilty of anything, just nothing could be DEFINITELY proved, but so many red flags and lets face it...investigating people from all over the world has got to take a long long time. It takes a long time to investigate someone within the U.S.

Also, just because a guy is released by a judge does not mean that what he was telling is the truth.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,464
9,683
136
That his own country released him for lack of evidence, is the only evidence I have in this matter. It means we cannot conclude that this man was guilty of anything.

Having established that, it becomes self evident that we wronged an innocent man. Measures must be in place to ensure that this does not happen, and that we can catch and correct it if it does happen.

The most important thing is that we learn from our mistakes.
 

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
Originally posted by: TechAZ
After reading this article I thought "there has to be reasons he was being held".....then I read the wikipedia articles on him and his associates. I can't blame the US for holding him for so long. That doesn't mean he was guilty of anything, just nothing could be DEFINITELY proved, but so many red flags...
Looks to me like those "red flags" are mostly conjecture built on conjecture, which is bound to happen when working on the premise of guilty until proven innocent.

I wonder how many people supporting this here would support the torture of the assassin of Dr. Tiller. That guy most certainly committed terrorism and claims to know about other plots. What about you TechAZ, would you take issue with our government torturing him?
 

TheSkinsFan

Golden Member
May 15, 2009
1,141
0
0
So, wait...

- We forced him to sit up straight in his chair?
- We made him run alongside the guards for physical fitness?
- His handcuffs were a bit too tight sometimes?
- We forced him to eat through an IV when he tried to starve himself to death?

...and these things are considered "torture"? really?!?

While I'm adamantly opposed to genuine torture, such as waterboarding, the fact that the detainee, the moron OP, and some others here, believe that the above events are torture, is a fucking joke.

Seriously folks, if you want the government to take you seriously in your opposition to actual torture techniques, then you need to stop using the term wrongfully in cases such as this one. Based on the detainee's own description of events, he was NOT "tortured." If what was done to him is someday defined as torture, then every single prisoner in the US' correctional system has more than likely been "tortured" as well; which is fvcking ridiculous.

Now, as for the detainee's innocence, I can only say that the US government should certainly compensate him and his family for the lost seven years. That's the right thing to do, but it has nothing to do with "torture."
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: TheSkinsFan
So, wait...

- We forced him to sit up straight in his chair?
- We made him run alongside the guards for physical fitness?
- His handcuffs were a bit too tight sometimes?
- We forced him to eat through an IV when he tried to starve himself to death?

...and these things are considered "torture"? really?!?

While I'm adamantly opposed to genuine torture, such as waterboarding, the fact that the detainee, the moron OP, and some others here, believe that the above events are torture, is a fucking joke.

Seriously folks, if you want the government to take you seriously in your opposition to actual torture techniques, then you need to stop using the term wrongfully in cases such as this one. Based on the detainee's own description of events, he was NOT "tortured." If what was done to him is someday defined as torture, then every single prisoner in the US' correctional system has more than likely been "tortured" as well; which is fvcking ridiculous.
So you're suggesting that every prisoner in the US' correctional system has been denied sleep for 16 straight days? If any prisoner was treated that way the person who ordered it would end up in prison himself.
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
This guy will be back fighting against us in Afghanistan within a month.
 

Red Irish

Guest
Mar 6, 2009
1,605
0
0
Originally posted by: Nebor
This guy will be back fighting against us in Afghanistan within a month.

You may be right, but the fact that he was tortured may influence this decision.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Nebor
This guy will be back fighting against us in Afghanistan within a month.
Such treatment of an innocent man can turn him into an enemy. However it seems he's more interested in getting his life back and spending time with his family who he was unjustly separated from for 7 years.

 

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
This just in - I don't believe liars. Especially when it's the new york slimes reporting it. Every criminal thinks they are innocent.

And LOL! at "they lifted me by my arm pits!!!" Yeah, get up when you are told prisoner or we wouldn't have to do that. Oh the huge manity!

Again, did you see where a US Federal judge said there was no evidence? The judge says there is no reason to hold him.

And did you also read the part where they intentionally stuck him with needles?

You are a troll. Or disgusting human being. Or maybe both. Take your pick.