Originally posted by: Crescent13
Come on!! A 512MB 6800GT??? Benchies already proved that 512MB of ram had no effect even on the 6800 ultra. on a 6800GT is way overkill. And for that price?? Just get a 7800GT or GTX for twice the performance.
Ok to clear this all up in simple words. The performance of the geforce 6200 512mb is great better than the 6600. But The gefore 6600 128mb has better grapics but slower fps speeds.
Originally posted by: orangat
Would it help in games like BF2 and FEAR where high quality textures kill performance?
Originally posted by: Crescent13
Come on!! A 512MB 6800GT??? Benchies already proved that 512MB of ram had no effect even on the 6800 ultra. on a 6800GT is way overkill. And for that price?? Just get a 7800GT or GTX for twice the performance.
Originally posted by: Yuriman
"Nigel Page is a strategist with Microsoft Australia. He told APC today that Vista would work best on a video card with more than 256MB RAM, 2GB of DDR3 memory and a S-ATA 2 hard drive."
I have a friend who happens to be a beta-tester, and it runs perfectly on his 128mb 9800pro, 1gb of ram, and 40gb IDE drive. Of course, it isn't nearly finished, but I think those claims are quite exaggerated.
Originally posted by: KoolDrew
Waste of money.
Originally posted by: babcom
http://www.apcstart.com/teched/pivot/entry.php?id=6
"...Vista would work best on a video card with more than 256MB RAM..."