And from EVGA themselves:
(quote)
eVGA.com's E1 version of the Ti 200 card was intended as a Ti 200 with the added advantage of 3.3ns memory. We, eVGA.com, never made any representation as to what the memory speed of the card could be run at, nor did we make any modification to the card's bios. The E1 is, as we stated, the same as the S1 version in all respects except for the memory on it.
We did this in an effort to supply a card with a potential for greater performance while still realizing the lower costs of the Ti 200. This way, we reasoned, we could bring a more powerful 3D card to our customers for a reasonable price. As a matter of fact, we sold these cards at the exact same price that the standard Ti 200 sells for.
We are sorry that our efforts to do something positive for our customers was met with such misunderstanding and resentment - it was not our aim to cause any of our customers to feel cheated or tricked.
The E1 version of the card, when properly installed and overclocked, can be reasonably expected to gain real performance advantages over a standard Ti 200 card.
A fair number of customers have been satisfied with this result, but there have been some that seem to be extremely disappointed and upset that the card would not reach the 600MHz potential that its 3.3ns memory suggests. So, for everyone I'd like to clarify a few things:
1) The PCB has been said in several places to be "defective" - this is a misstatement and is not accurate at all. The PCB is the same as is used for the standard Ti 200 cards and is produced DIRECTLY from the nVidia reference design. The Ti 200 PCB was not designed to support memory operating at such high speeds (600 MHz) - and as a result acts as a limiting factor. But from our perspective, this is not an issue - the card still gets much faster than a standard Ti 200, and it costs the same amount. In any case, the PCB is NOT defective or poorly designed.
2) eVGA.com NEVER represented that the card would run at 600 MHz. We DID state that the memory had the potential to run at 600 MHz - but we did not state that the card would support it. Some people have said that this is deceptive and smacks of false advertising, but we would have to disagree. When was the last time anyone got a true 1.5Mbps connection on a T1 line? A real 56K modem connection? A real 12 PPM from a 12PPM printer? There are many, many more examples we could site. Certainly we could have been clearer, and we regret the fact that we did not make the situation more clear than we did.
3) With this product we have also been accused of "talking out of both sides of our mouths" on the issue of overclocking. So, we would like to clear that up as well. We DO NOT endorse or support overclocking - and this stance has not stopped a number of our customers from engaging in it all the same. In deference to them, this card is a much better choice than a standard Ti 200.
So, these are our reasons for releasing the E1 card in its current state, if this is something that you still find unacceptable, then regrettably the only thing that we can suggest is that you return it to your vendor.
I hope that everyone can understand this, and to those who are upset, we do appologize for not communicating our intentions as well as we should have.