Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: ElFenix
*cough*
What are the implications of the fourthirds system?
Nice looking camera
live preview in an slr.
dust reduction that works very well (i've seen the pictures of that shack you call a motel out iin the middle of the desert)
smaller lenses for equivalent FOVs. (just go look at the camera in a store, particularly with the 40-150 lens on it, you'll be shocked).
lenses can also be made faster for equivalent FOVs (the 35-100 f/2.0, for example, which is a stop faster than canikon's 70-200 f/2.8s).
the jury is still out on depth of field capability (mostly because depth of field has so many variables and is a value judgment anyway).
theoretically lenses should also be less expensive to manufacture (smaller glass needed) for equivalent FOVs, but olympus is so small that it can't match canikon's economies of scale.
theoretically lower vignetting because the telecentric design makes the light at the edges of the sensor more perpendicular, but i'm not sure it's any different than the 'sweet spot' that 35 mm frame lenses enjoy on any crop body.
all of the zuiko digital lenses have a digital specific lens coating.
olympus seems to have more pleasing colors right out of the camera than anyone else, without looking processed.
and the wide angle lenses may be the best in the business.
negatives are that there isn't much 3rd party lens support (though, sigma isn't a traditional third party as it is a proper licensee of the 4/3 system).
there is a decided lack of prime lenses at the moment (and not many in the pipe).
there can be higher noise due to the smaller sensor (though the new NMOS used in the E-410/510 at least matches the sony CCDs used by everyone but canon, and may be pretty close to canon).
and though i'm partial to the E-410, if you'd like a hand grip and sensor-shift IS, the E-510 has that.
it's time for bed. i hope i've confused you further :evil: