- Feb 23, 2005
- 22,902
- 2,359
- 126
Now we know. Per pound, humans are a poor diet. Sorry cannibals.
https://arstechnica.com/science/201...ibal-on-a-paleo-diet-human-flesh-is-just-meh/
https://arstechnica.com/science/201...ibal-on-a-paleo-diet-human-flesh-is-just-meh/
Because archeological sites suggest that non-adults were also consumed, Cole then calculated calorie contents of male human infants, children, and teens, based on size. Eating an entire baby offers about 12,823 calories, he found. Sadly, he couldn’t estimate similar calorie contents for female hominins—he didn't find published chemical compositions for them. And, he noted, “the collection of primary data of this nature was outside the ethical (and legal) scope of this study.”
Using the male estimate, Cole could then roughly calculate the total calories consumed from skeletal muscle or whole bodies at nine different archeological sites that had evidence of cannibalism. For instance, in Gough’s Cave in England, bones dated around 14,700 years ago at the end of the ice age suggested that two adults, two teens, and an infant were eaten, possibly for nutritional reason. If diners ate the whole bodies, they would have had 519,559 calories total. If they just stuck with the skeletal muscle, they would have gotten 114,773 calories.
