Ever swim in a live Nuclear Reactor Pool??

Analog

Lifer
Jan 7, 2002
12,755
3
0
nuke%20fuel%20pool.jpg


CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. -- Authorities say a worker fell into a reactor pool at the San Onofre nuclear power plant in San Diego County last week but he didn't receive a significant radiation dose.
Southern California Edison spokesman Gil Alexander says the man was leaning over to retrieve a flashlight when he lost his balance and fell into the Unit 2 reactor pool on Jan. 27.
The pool's more than 20 feet deep and holds water that circulates through the reactor core.
Alexander tells the North County Times ( http://bit.ly/w9FzZx) that the worker, who's employed by a private contractor, was wearing a life preserver. He received 5 millirems of radiation.
That's not considered a major dose and he went back to work the same day.
By comparison, a chest X-ray provides about a 4-millirem dose.



http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/03/4236855/san-onofre-nuke-plant-work-falls.html


:eek:
 

brianmanahan

Lifer
Sep 2, 2006
24,638
6,016
136
did you see the part where it said his radiation dosage was only %20 more than a chest xray?

or do you only look at the pictures?
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
did you see the part where it said his radiation dosage was only %20 more than a chest xray?

or do you only look at the pictures?

Analog is a pretty smart guy. He posted that the guy received a 5 millirem dose, compared to 4 millirems in an x-ray. I think the math is pretty trivial to him. Which, by the way, is 25% more.
 

Matthiasa

Diamond Member
May 4, 2009
5,755
23
81
A little surprised the water was cool enough to not do bad things.
But I suppose it's circulated often enough to keep it cool.
 

brianmanahan

Lifer
Sep 2, 2006
24,638
6,016
136
Analog is a pretty smart guy. He posted that the guy received a 5 millirem dose, compared to 4 millirems in an x-ray. I think the math is pretty trivial to him. Which, by the way, is 25% more.

nope its 20% less

also i doubt he could match wits with my intellect
 

amish

Diamond Member
Aug 20, 2004
4,295
6
81
nope it's 20% less.

also, i doubt he could match wits with my intellect.

dude. divide 5 by 4. what do you get?

also, it would be hard to match your intellect when you have poor grammar and punctuation.
 
Last edited:

InverseOfNeo

Diamond Member
Nov 17, 2000
3,719
0
0
nope its 20% less

also i doubt he could match wits with my intellect

Which is different than 20% more. You said it was 20% more, which is wrong. The chest x-ray is 25% more than what he received - which DrPizza corrected you on. What he received is, indeed, 20% less than a chest x-ray. :)
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
5 is 25% more than 4 (1 is 25% of 4).

4 is 20% less than 5 (1 is 20% of 5).

MotionMan

brianmanahan said:
yes that is exactly what i have said

Let's check your previous post...

did you see the part where it said his radiation dosage was only %20 more than a chest xray?

or do you only look at the pictures?

Looks like he was right. Also, who puts the % before the number?
 

911paramedic

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2002
9,448
1
76
5 is 25% more than 4 (1 is 25% of 4).

4 is 20% less than 5 (1 is 20% of 5).

MotionMan
Thank you, I hate when people talk about apples and oranges like that.

(Like that extra dollar at the hotel math question, it's apples and oranges and that's what makes it work.)
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
Where is that reactor located? They're just asking for trouble.

An optimal location would be by the ocean, where there's an infinite source of cold water.

It's on the pacific coast, north of San Diego. I've driven by a few times. I got the movie reference earlier in this thread. ;)
 
Last edited: