EU sanctions against Syria actually did something!

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
Sanctions are not often effective, but in this case they actually stopped attack helocopters from being sent to Syria (at least for now).

A British marine insurer cancelled its coverage of a Russian ship after learning the ship may be carrying helicopters and missiles to Syria, The Telegraph reported.
The ship, named MV Alaed, reportedly picked up the Mi25 helicopters known as “flying tanks,” which were being repaired at the Russian port of Kaliningrad, the report said. The helicopters were then shipped on a course that most likely would lead them to the Syrian port of Tartous, the report said.
The European Union, under sanctions announced last year, banned the export of arms to Syria and do not allow companies to provide insurance for those exports, the report said. With no insurance, sources tell the paper that the ship cannot complete its voyage.
After being informed by the British government that insuring the shipment would likely be a breach of EU sanctions, Standard Club, the insurer, reportedly stopped covering any ship owned by Femco, the Russian cargo line, The Telegraph said.
"We were made aware of the allegations that the Alaed was carrying munitions destined for Syria," the company said in a statement to the paper. "We have already informed the ship owner that their insurance cover ceased automatically in view of the nature of the voyage."
Officials told the paper that they will continue to monitor the ship, which now sits off the coast to Hebrides, Scotland.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/0...pters-to-syria/?test=latestnews#ixzz1yFEr8WXe

If I was Russia, I would insure the vessel for the trip, just to spite everyone.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,457
33,161
136
I heard it was good intentions...which is what sanctions usually are. In this instance, they actually did something positive.
You are thinking of hell. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
You are thinking of hell. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Oh yeah, you are right. But in thinking more about it, I realize there is no road to Heaven - it is a stairway.

That said, what do you think about the topic of the thread?
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,457
33,161
136
Oh yeah, you are right. But in thinking more about it, I realize there is no road to Heaven - it is a stairway.

That said, what do you think about the topic of the thread?
I don't give a shit about the middle east. I was just commenting on your commentary.
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
I don't give a shit about the middle east. I was just commenting on your commentary.

So your purpose is to derail the thread. That is against the rules. Just a friendly warning to you.

Back to the actual topic, which is listed quite clearly in the thread title.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,457
33,161
136
So your purpose is to derail the thread. That is against the rules. Just a friendly warning to you.

Back to the actual topic, which is listed quite clearly in the thread title.
Commenting on your commentary is not derailing the thread, AFAIK.


It is derailing the thread when it goes on for more than one post. Please don't derail the thread, it is not about the road to hell or steps to heaven, perpetuating derail is no less derailing than starting the derail process in the first place.

Administrator Idontcare
 
Last edited by a moderator:

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
According to Russia (different articles); these helicopters were Syrian owned ; sent back to Russia for refurbishment

How can one ban something that is already owned
banned the export of arms to Syria
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
According to Russia (different articles); these helicopters were Syrian owned ; sent back to Russia for refurbishment

How can one ban something that is already owned

Not sure about EU law, but in US law exporting also covers services and not just goods. Russia exported their repair services for the helos, part of which is the transport of the helos.

That would be my best guess at it. Either that or the insurance company was simply afraid of losing all their EU business if they continued to insure the ship even if they were in the legal right.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,950
10,294
136
Russia and China intend to protect the Middle East in massacring its own people. This is a challenge to world powers, to determine just how far each side is willing to go when the ultimate destination is nuclear war.

The question is, where do we draw the line and simply let Syrians die? It'd be for our own good with Russia backing Assad.
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
Syria has no oil (unlike Libya), we do not need a law saying not to go to war there.


I always understood sanctions to only be effective if you don't actually have to use them - the threat of them is the real power. This shows there is some benefit after they are put in place too.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Russia and China intend to protect the Middle East in massacring its own people. This is a challenge to world powers, to determine just how far each side is willing to go when the ultimate destination is nuclear war.

The question is, where do we draw the line and simply let Syrians die? It'd be for our own good with Russia backing Assad.

Russia and China believe that the West should leave countries alone; stop intervening when they want to impose there political ideology on the area.
The West has it's sphere of influence - no need to try to expand it.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
I heard it was good intentions...which is what sanctions usually are. In this instance, they actually did something positive.

I don't know, I think sanctions covering the right things can be reasonably useful. Even with the rise of China, the combination of the US and EU controls a huge portion of the world economy either directly or indirectly. It can't cover every situation, but the threat of economic isolation can be a decent one.
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
Usually the threat is what forces the country to comply. If you have to actually make good on the threat, the effect actually ends up hurting the leadership very little if at all.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Actually it's more like Obama and Cameron got to talking to Putin in Mexico and got him to see their side of it. Merkle was there as was Hollande. Cameron broke the news not long ago.

PS It wasn't out of the niceness of Putins heart. The West made concessions, we'll just have to wait and see what they are. I'm guessing we've promised Putin a sweet deal over a % of the energy industry in Syria.

PSS Take every piece of news you get about Syria with a grain of salt as no real reporting is being done in the area. "Civilians being mortared!" Of course they're just "civilians" and not armed protestors. Syria looks more like Libya and that's even more reason to STAY THE FUCK OUT!