Originally posted by: mamisano
Originally posted by: mosco
I was going to wait for the KT600 but i decided it would take a couple board revisions to take any bugs out which would make the wait even longer. Not sure it would be worth investing in the Athlon Xp at that point. it looks good.
Just think of the KT600 as the 3rd revision of the KT400
😉
actually, the KT400 should have been called the KT333A chipset. the KT400A should have been the KT400 as it was the first to support DDR400 and the KT600 should be called the KT400A because it was the first chipset to support DDR400 well. in case you're keeping score at home, here is a via chipset history for AMD:
KT133 (supported PC133 and sucked)
KT133A (supported PC133 well)
KT266 (first DDR chipset, should have been called the Via Abortion)
KT266A (first good DDR chipset)
KT333 (DDR333, whoopie)
KT400 (better version of KT333, should be called the KT333A)
KT400A (first DDR400 compatible chipset, why couldn't this be done with BIOS update)
KT600 (would be more appropriate as the KT400A in keeping with the tradition of not getting it right until the second attempt)
via, it is a love-hate relationship: we hate your sh*tty chipsets and you love taking out money every few months when you fix the bugs and make a new mobo. goodbye forever!