Escaped Convict Recaptured After 38 Years

Brutuskend

Lifer
Apr 2, 2001
26,558
4
0
Escaped Convict Recaptured After 38 Years
By DON THOMPSON, Associated Press Writer
Sat May 20, 1:14 AM

SACRAMENTO, Calif. - After 38 years, Michael Robert Smith figured no one was looking for him anymore. He escaped from prison on June 7, 1968, while serving time for a robbery conviction, then headed to Nevada, then New Jersey and into a marriage that didn't work out. Finally, five years ago, Smith moved to a tiny trailer in a heavily wooded area of Creek County, Okla. It turned out the California Department of Corrections was still on his trail.

Authorities found him Thursday, his clothes paint-splattered from one of the few jobs he could hold without a driver's license or other identification.

"He looked at the ground a little bit, then he looked up and said, `Yeah, that's me,'" Creek County Sheriff's Detective Les Ruhman said Friday. "He didn't dream people would be looking for him for so long."

The case had long grown cold until December 2003, when Judy Foster, a special agent at the California corrections department who found another escaped convict in 2004, reopened the investigation.

Smith's family and friends all denied knowing where he had gone, but Foster eventually discovered that Smith was using the his mother's maiden name _ Gallion _ and living outside Sapulpa, 13 miles southwest of Tulsa.

"The truth is, we never stop looking for these people," said department spokeswoman Terry Thornton. She refused to explain how Foster found the men, saying she didn't want to tip off future escaped convicts.

A department report says 21 inmates escaped from prisons and camps last year, and 20 from community programs. Of those, 31 had been recaptured, the report said.

Smith's case was unusual because he escaped from a prison, while most escaped convicts walk away from a work camp or community program, said department spokeswoman Elaine Jennings.

Smith, now 63, is being held without bond and likely will be shipped back to California within 10 days, after an extradition hearing.

He had served three years of a five years-to-life sentence at the Correctional Training Facility in Soledad, 67 miles southeast of San Jose.

"It's just amazing he made it all these years and never had a run-in with the law," Ruhman said.

 

imported_bum

Golden Member
Jan 15, 2005
1,402
1
0
Haha. I actually personally knew a guy (or his fake identity) that escaped from jail in MA and lived a public life for 20+ years in Chicago. He was actually arrested and fingerprinted while "on the run" but it took police 11 years to realize he was actually MA's most wanted man. Story: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._J._Jameson
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
What's the point in arresting him?
I'm not saying it's OK to commit crimes, but shouldn't half the point of prison be to rehabilitate people so they can then go back into society and not commit crimes anymore?
I would assume that if he managed to stay 38 years under the radar, that he hasn't committed any more crimes, so he doesn't really need to go back to prison and be a burden on society, does he?

*possibly depending on the crime. I'm not sure what fits a 5 years to life sentence.
 

Cooler

Diamond Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,835
0
0
If he has done nothing wrong in last 38 years he should be kept out of prison as he is obviously no danger to society and would only be a tax payer drain in prison.
 

LordMorpheus

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2002
6,871
1
0
Originally posted by: Cooler
If he has done nothing wrong in last 38 years he should be kept out of prison as he is obviously no danger to society and would only be a tax payer drain in prison.

i think he'll probably get parolled - but then he'll be stuck in one place and without a job, might force him back to crime.

it was a robbery conviction, says so in the article.
 
Jun 4, 2005
19,723
1
0
Originally posted by: LordMorpheus
Originally posted by: Cooler
If he has done nothing wrong in last 38 years he should be kept out of prison as he is obviously no danger to society and would only be a tax payer drain in prison.

i think he'll probably get parolled - but then he'll be stuck in one place and without a job, might force him back to crime.

it was a robbery conviction, says so in the article.

You think they'll paroll an escaped convict?