(1) There have been no attempts to make contraceptives illegalEither your vocabulary is tragically limited, or, like Romney and Ryan, you're lying divert attention from the truth. Women's reproductive rights encompass far more than just a woman's right to determine whether and when she can terminate a pregnancy. It includes the right to obtain contraceptive products to prevent pregnancy and even basic gynecological health care. Under the tyranical "personhood" bills Republicans have attempted to pass in many states, it would also determine the right to in vitro fertilization.
If you're going to call me "crazy," either step up and prove me wrong, or STFU, little boy. :colbert:Ahh, how we've missed Harvey's craziness. Here's looking forward to the good times ahead after Romney is elected.![]()
No, you have rendered yourself impotent and see it in me. You live in illusion and I see reality. I freely admit I am impotent to show you that, but, and this of course is another of those buts you can't see, I am impotent because you love not being able to see. You took the shitty end of the stick because you live in an altered reality where shit has the look and feel of gold. You, my friend, speaking of French, are Pepe Le Pew. Your long nightmare of delusion, however, I think can end, if you have nobody to struggle against and find the kindness of folk like me who have a fondness for all kinds of animals.I can't take you seriously because your Avatar is that of a clown. You yourself have said as much - that you should not be taken seriously. You have rendered yourself impotent. C'est la vie.
me to.Ahh, how we've missed Harvey's craziness. Here's looking forward to the good times ahead after Romney is elected.![]()
lolEPIC FAILURE
Is also assigned to you, Harvey. Will you do us a favor and copy paste the atrocities of the Bush administration and then go line by line and see how many Obama continued/expanded. You won't because you play partisan politics. I'll never understand the mentality of people who blame one side for horrible things but when its from their team its "Oh but they did it too!"
No matter how scathing this is. I still love you Harvey :biggrin::wub:
Not to interrupt the dumbacrat versus replirat circle jerk but could you please show evidence on the stuff they did not agree upon, since by your own article they don't agree on everything.A bit reading challenged are you, EK?
Romney's faux renunciation is just one more flip flop, just as he has flipped on every other issue he has ever addressed. Both the Telegraph and Faux articles quote Willkie:
That means the one "smearing" Romney with "innuendo" would be... wait for it... MITT ROMNEY! :whiste:
Oh, really? Why don't you prove me wrong, and I might consider that you may ever have posted one word of truth, anywhere at any time.EPIC FAILURE
Is also assigned to you, Harvey.
Great! You CAN'T disprove my statement that Romney is lying about his association with wingnut Dr. John Wilke, or that he hasn't pandered to wingnut Republican lifers so the best you can do is attempt to derail THIS thread to divert attention from THIS issue regarding THIS election.Will you do us a favor and copy paste the atrocities of the Bush administration and then go line by line and see how many Obama continued/expanded. You won't because you play partisan politics. I'll never understand the mentality of people who blame one side for horrible things but when its from their team its "Oh but they did it too!"
You're still the same typical wingnut liar, and love would not be what comes to mind if I were to waste any time thinking about you.No matter how scathing this is. I still love you Harvey :biggrin::wub:
It really amuses me to see both sides use this absurdly effective tactic of getting both of their "troops" to fight tooth and nail over an issue that is basically irrelevant. The Supreme Court has spoken, there is very little that Congress could do and a fuckton less that could actually get passed. But hey, keep up the good non-relevant work that your team has manipulated you into doing. I am sure that they truly appreciate it. It keeps the real issues, you know the ones that something can actually be done about but neither side actually wants to do, out of the spotlight.Either your vocabulary is tragically limited, or, like Romney and Ryan, you're lying divert attention from the truth. Women's reproductive rights encompass far more than just a woman's right to determine whether and when she can terminate a pregnancy. It includes the right to obtain contraceptive products to prevent pregnancy and even basic gynecological health care. Under the tyranical "personhood" bills Republicans have attempted to pass in many states, it would also determine the right to in vitro fertilization.
Ryan and Akin co-sponsored several bills in Congress that would impose the same exact terms in Federal law, and these onorous conditions are written into the official Republican Party platform.
If Romney thinks he can now stepback and "renounce" that platform, it's just one more example of him painting himself as the same flip flopping, lying hypocrite he is, now, and always has been.![]()
I'm not going to waste the time. If you want to prove me wrong, you're welcome to go ahead and try.Not to interrupt the dumbacrat versus replirat circle jerk but could you please show evidence on the stuff they did not agree upon, since by your own article they don't agree on everything.
I agree like Gitmo bay! fuck him eh? that place was shit!Even stranger, with all the time you've had, and with all of my posts about the Bushwhackos' many heinous crimes against the United States of America and its citizens readily available for you to find on the forums, you STILL haven't been able disprove ANY of them.
.
Wingnuts never tire of the same tired, pathetic "schtick" -- Attack those who speak the truth and lie, distract and divert attention from from the issue.Harvey's back with a new schtick...Republicans hate women! Too funny.
False. There's still a lot of raving on the Right wrt "free contraceptives for Sluts!" & "Men forced to pay for women's healthcare!" Waaahhh!First sentence of your link
Reproductive rights is code for abortion rights. So saying that the "war on women" is code for "war on abortion" would seem to be pretty accurate.
As we've seen, both the law & the composition of the SCOTUS are fluid. If nothing else, The future court will likely be altered over the next 4 years, so the choice for president today is quite relevant to the future of women's rights.It really amuses me to see both sides use this absurdly effective tactic of getting both of their "troops" to fight tooth and nail over an issue that is basically irrelevant. The Supreme Court has spoken, there is very little that Congress could do and a fuckton less that could actually get passed. But hey, keep up the good non-relevant work that your team has manipulated you into doing. I am sure that they truly appreciate it. It keeps the real issues, you know the ones that something can actually be done about but neither side actually wants to do, out of the spotlight.
So expecting women to take care of themselves is a "war on women"False. There's still a lot of raving on the Right wrt "free contraceptives for Sluts!" & "Men forced to pay for women's healthcare!" Waaahhh!
You've engaged in some of it yourself, iirc...
That is liberal interpretation. And the whole point of personhood is to make abortion illegal.nehalem256
"(2) There have been no attempts to make gynecological health care illegal"
Therapeutic use of many birth control methods and even abortion would be denied under "personhood".
No. It is plan liberal propaganda. You are probably one of those people that believes and "up to 80% off sale" means everything is 80% off."(3) "pershonhood" bills only would affect in vitro fertilization in liberal fantasies. Find me one conservative source that says they would ban in vitro fertilization"
No conservative source needed, scientific sources verify the effect. Conservatives are actually afraid to publicly acknowledge this collateral damage. It is not the thrust of the bills, but a result none-the-less.
Maybe because there is no nationwide conspiracy to pay men 30% more for the same work. Do you think corporations hate women more than they love moneyDo you forget "equal pay" as a battleground against women?
If companies really discriminated against women that would be impossible.And a study shows that in most U.S. cities, single, childless women under 30 are making an average of 8 percent more money than their male counterparts, with Atlanta and Miami in the lead at 20 percent.
That is the Republican's newest idea.. if you have been paying attention to legislation attempts and successes this past year.Harvey's back with a new schtick...Republicans hate women! Too funny.
You have a bad memory or are suffering from Alzheimers. Not only did I agree with your "criminal cabal" statements back then but I still do and also think Romney is no better than Obama. Where does that leave your partisan hackery nutjob wackadoo bullshit now? Are you calling Obama out on the same shit Bush did? No? I rest my case.Oh, really? Why don't you prove me wrong, and I might consider that you may ever have posted one word of truth, anywhere at any time.
Great! You CAN'T disprove my statement that Romney is lying about his association with wingnut Dr. John Wilke, or that he hasn't pandered to wingnut Republican lifers so the best you can do is attempt to derail THIS thread to divert attention from THIS issue regarding THIS election.
Been studying Karl Rove again, have you?
Even stranger, with all the time you've had, and with all of my posts about the Bushwhackos' many heinous crimes against the United States of America and its citizens readily available for you to find on the forums, you STILL haven't been able disprove ANY of them.
Maybe it's time you just admitted I was right about those charges, as well. :|
You're still the same typical wingnut liar, and love would not be what comes to mind if I were to waste any time thinking about you.