- Sep 15, 2008
- 5,056
- 199
- 116
TLDR version?
Govt. to potential employee -> Hey you, fill out this form detailing the past 5-10 years of your life, including all potential vulnerabilities in your finances, relationships, attitude, history etc. How is it easy for you to be compromised?
Potential employee -> Okay here you go.
Govt. to employee -> Okay well we lost all that.
Now someone has possibly the above on every federal employee.
Govt. to potential employee -> Hey you, fill out this form detailing the past 5-10 years of your life, including all potential vulnerabilities in your finances, relationships, attitude, history etc. How is it easy for you to be compromised?
Potential employee -> Okay here you go.
Govt. to employee -> Okay well we lost all that.
Now someone has possibly the above on every federal employee.
That's pretty close...
Then, when hired, it's:
Govt. to employee -> Now we just need you to do that again on this site, this site, and this site. Then update your personal information on these other 4 sites, your medical information on another site, and your family members information on this totally separate site.
Employee -> That seems a little...extraneous, doesn't it?
Govt. to employee -> I'm not even sure what you're talking about. Oh, and we just got hacked, sorry about that...update your information on this other website so that we can keep in contact with you as we work through this trying time.
Employee -> :|
But fear not! According to the email I received, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team is on the case.
...I know I'll sleep easier tonight.
Should I point out the irony of OPM including a section in the email titled:
"How to avoid becoming a victim"?
As a followup: http://arstechnica.com/information-...tor-on-security-issues-were-trying-very-hard/
Why have Archuleta and Seymour not been handed their walking papers, yet? Why aren't Americans demanding such action in cases like this where negligence and incompetence are on clear display?