• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

EPA Requests 230,000 New Bureaucrats To Regulate "Greenhouse Gases"

Patranus

Diamond Member
The EPA aims to regulate greenhouse gas emissions through the Clean Air Act, even though the law doesn’t give the EPA explicit power to do so. The agency’s authority to move forward is being challenged in court by petitioners who argue that such a decision should be left for Congress to make.

The proposed regulations would set greenhouse gas emission thresholds above which businesses must file for an EPA permit and complete extra paperwork in order to continue operating. If the EPA wins its court battle and fully rolls out the greenhouse gas regulations, the number of businesses forced into this regulatory regime would grow tremendously — from approximately 14,000 now to as many as 6.1 million.

“Hiring the 230,000 full-time employees necessary to produce the 1.4 billion work hours required to address the actual increase in permitting functions would result in an increase in Title V administration costs of $21 billion per year,” the EPA wrote in the court brief.

http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/26/epa-regulations-would-require-230000-new-employees-21-billion/

Gotta love the 4th branch of the federal government.
 
oh fucking lord... 230,000 government employees? even at the 50k salary cap I believe all government(fed) should be capped at that still comes out to 11,500,000,000 each year to pay them and that's not including benefits, pensions, operating costs. Do we really need this tax burden when we're already killing our industry with over regulation?
 
All I can find on this is from hack right wing sites.

Anyone have at least a mostly impartial source?
 
All I can find on this is from hack right wing sites.

Anyone have at least a mostly impartial source?

I am sure we can count on this story as being as truthful and objectively reported as tHe story about Obama's EPA banning OTC inhalers.

No wait. That was 100% bullshit... Now I see your confusion.
 
Ummm..... no.

In case they haven't noticed the government currently spends fuckloads more money than it takes in. No new positions or spending should be allowed unless it can be proven to be absolutely needed.
 
oh fucking lord... 230,000 government employees? even at the 50k salary cap I believe all government(fed) should be capped at that still comes out to 11,500,000,000 each year to pay them and that's not including benefits, pensions, operating costs. Do we really need this tax burden when we're already killing our industry with over regulation?

Tax burden? This is stimulus! JOBS!!!
 
The government should just hire everyone needing a job, then the problem would be solved just like it was in the USSR, oh wait....
 
If this is true some on this msgboard have said this is a good thing for the economy. It creates jobs pushing paper. The end result of our big govt policy. Dont create anything, just push paper and keep the peons busy.
 
These are the "green jobs" we were promised by the Dipshit in Cheif. They could even be considered "shovel ready" since all they are going to be doing in shoveling bullshit to the general public and telling us to buy CFL bulbs to fix the ozone layer. Quick, buy a POS GM electric car because its so much more environmentally friendly. Pahleease!
 
The EPA currently employs approximately 17,000 people, but you guys think that the government is going to hire 13 times as many people as the EPA has total employees currently to administer one rule. It is exceedingly unlikely that is 1.) what is actually being said, and 2.) would ever happen even if it were.

Use your heads people, seriously.
 
These are the "green jobs" we were promised by the Dipshit in Cheif. They could even be considered "shovel ready" since all they are going to be doing in shoveling bullshit to the general public and telling us to buy CFL bulbs to fix the ozone layer. Quick, buy a POS GM electric car because its so much more environmentally friendly. Pahleease!

You should change your icon to butthurt.

If you are concerned about overspending, let's all agree to cut the military budget by 75%. We spend 40% of the entire world's military, while having 1/12 of the population, surrounded by oceans on 2 sides, 1 peaceful neighbor to the north, and one weak neighbor to the south.
 
The EPA currently employs approximately 17,000 people, but you guys think that the government is going to hire 13 times as many people as the EPA has total employees currently to administer one rule. It is exceedingly unlikely that is 1.) what is actually being said, and 2.) would ever happen even if it were.

Use your heads people, seriously.

If the EPA employs one person, that's one too many.
 
If the EPA employs one person, that's one too many.

You're right. We should be more like China, they don't allow no fancy environmental regulations to hamper their industry!

20091020luguang10.jpg


I have a good friend who worked in Beijing for a year. They would have what were basically spitoons in the corners of their offices where people would regularly go hack up black shit and spit it into them because of how polluted their air was.
 
Been there, done that. I did notice that it took about a week before I wasn't glowing green anymore. Fucking idiot!

Good, I just want you to get used to swimming in oil. You should get used to your future.

Personal attack! OUCH! Good one! You really showed me who was boss!
 
Good, I just want you to get used to swimming in oil. You should get used to your future.

Personal attack! OUCH! Good one! You really showed me who was boss!

ROFL, I was calling myself a fucking idiot for swimming in the Gulf, knowing full well how "bad" it was for me. But if the shoe fits.....
 
One of the worst greenhouse gases is r134a, yet to date the EPA refuses to ban the over the counter sales of it to anyone, even though it requires everyone who works with it professionally to have EPA approved recovery/recycling equipment,

but they ban Inhalers.😵
 
EPA and DOE were available during Republican govt right? why didnt they get rid of them then? if they are so against it.
 
One of the worst greenhouse gases is r134a, yet to date the EPA refuses to ban the over the counter sales of it to anyone, even though it requires everyone who works with it professionally to have EPA approved recovery/recycling equipment,


Huh?
 
Back
Top