• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

EPA Fines Drop 70% in 2017

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
Hasn't everyone already quit the EPA? All I hear about these days are mass resignations as people leave to get better paychecks and working environments and a chance to do actual good elsewhere.
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,806
14,001
136
I think the EPA serves a good purpose, but they can be pretty heavy handed. Like most government agencies, I think there is a lot of bloat there and am happy to see a rollback.
Perhaps you can provide some evidence to show that they were being heavy handed.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
When will you figure out that when Trump wins, America loses?

It seems that only those that expect for the government to hand them the means to life on a platter are losing, the rest of us self-made types are thriving.
 

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126
It seems that only those that expect for the government to hand them the means to life on a platter are losing, the rest of us self-made types are thriving.

Um so filling rivers full of toxic waste consequence free is your definition of winning? For whom?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sheik Yerbouti

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
It seems that only those that expect for the government to hand them the means to life on a platter are losing, the rest of us self-made types are thriving.

Drop the straw man. Also, it's funny how you're "thriving" when you were bragging about getting, what, $185 more per month through the tax plan? If you were thriving, $185 a month would be a rounding error on your monthly income.

And we're not stupid. You said this was "probably a good thing" without even looking into it. You don't actually care about the facts; you're just eager to rubber stamp whatever Trump does because you worship the ground he walks on. Again, it's hilarious how much you lie about embracing left-wing values, because virtually no one on the left embraces irresponsible deregulation and anti-environmental stances.
 

outriding

Diamond Member
Feb 20, 2002
4,428
3,852
136
I think the EPA serves a good purpose, but they can be pretty heavy handed. Like most government agencies, I think there is a lot of bloat there and am happy to see a rollback.

Go live next to a dump that leaks run off and get back to me on how that works out
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
So, does this mean that the people the EPA fines are all of a sudden 70% goodlier, or what?

I'm sure Scott Pruitt convinced them to be that way from his soundproof booth. You betcha.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,452
136
Go live next to a dump that leaks run off and get back to me on how that works out
or downstream from some 'clean coal' mining operation. Either will work. I'll buy a tablet for you to keep daily notes in, you know, to track how your cardiopulmonary functions are deteriorating, or the puzzling increase of heavy metals in your bloodstream and organs or the oddly higher ratio of birth defects in the area compared to someplace not in the shadow of a 'clean coal' mining facility.
img_2031.JPG


Drink up motherfucker, but do it quick, that 'water' will probably erode through that glass quickly
 

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126
or downstream from some 'clean coal' mining operation. Either will work. I'll buy a tablet for you to keep daily notes in, you know, to track how your cardiopulmonary functions are deteriorating, or the puzzling increase of heavy metals in your bloodstream and organs or the oddly higher ratio of birth defects in the area compared to someplace not in the shadow of a 'clean coal' mining facility.

Drink up motherfucker, but do it quick, that 'water' will probably erode through that glass quickly

It is baffling to me how conservatives believe that corporations will willingly spend billions to ensure that they aren't polluting if the government doesn't enforce regulations. Either they aren't that bright or they really don't give a shit if we live in shit.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,452
136
It is baffling to me how conservatives believe that corporations will willingly spend billions to ensure that they aren't polluting if the government doesn't enforce regulations. Either they aren't that bright or they really don't give a shit if we live in shit.
I'm really not sure which drumpf is going to fuck up more, the environment or the educational system, either way, what great wins for the kiddies.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
It is baffling to me how conservatives believe that corporations will willingly spend billions to ensure that they aren't polluting if the government doesn't enforce regulations. Either they aren't that bright or they really don't give a shit if we live in shit.

Today a corporation will fire you for not being PC enough. Ruining a river with pollution would be very non-PC.