Enterprise spam filtering software?

Rudee

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
11,218
2
76
I don't run anything other then Microsoft pop-up blocker and Microsoft anti-spyware.
 

RagingBITCH

Lifer
Sep 27, 2003
17,618
2
76
Enterprise spam filtering. Not personal pop up blocker. :p

And at my old company, used to use Symantec Enterprise
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
Get a gateway appliance. The Solinus MailFoundry works very well.

PM me if you want other solutions (that I have tested).
 

cross6

Senior member
Jun 16, 2005
508
0
0
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Get a gateway appliance. The Solinus MailFoundry works very well.

PM me if you want other solutions (that I have tested).

I don't know if a gateway will work well with our network setup
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
Originally posted by: cross6
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Get a gateway appliance. The Solinus MailFoundry works very well.

PM me if you want other solutions (that I have tested).

I don't know if a gateway will work well with our network setup

You want an enterprise solution, which leads me to believe that you use internal mail server(s), and your emails go through mx record(s) that has to come through a firewall at some perimeter. Right?
 

cross6

Senior member
Jun 16, 2005
508
0
0
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: cross6
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Get a gateway appliance. The Solinus MailFoundry works very well.

PM me if you want other solutions (that I have tested).

I don't know if a gateway will work well with our network setup

You want an enterprise solution, which leads me to believe that you use internal mail server(s), and your emails go through mx record(s) that has to come through a firewall at some perimeter. Right?


mx record --> two net connections --> two pix's --> two routers (HSRP group) --> mail server

 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
Originally posted by: cross6
Originally posted by: SagaLore

You want an enterprise solution, which leads me to believe that you use internal mail server(s), and your emails go through mx record(s) that has to come through a firewall at some perimeter. Right?


mx record --> two net connections --> two pix's --> two routers (HSRP group) --> mail server

You only have 1 mx record and 1 mail server, but redundant connections/hardware in between? Is that correct?

If so, then a gateway appliance is still your best bet. It can sit behind the firewalls and each one will tunnel port 25 on your mx IP to the appliance. Then it will send filtered email to your mail server.
 

cross6

Senior member
Jun 16, 2005
508
0
0
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: cross6
Originally posted by: SagaLore

You want an enterprise solution, which leads me to believe that you use internal mail server(s), and your emails go through mx record(s) that has to come through a firewall at some perimeter. Right?


mx record --> two net connections --> two pix's --> two routers (HSRP group) --> mail server

You only have 1 mx record and 1 mail server, but redundant connections/hardware in between? Is that correct?

If so, then a gateway appliance is still your best bet. It can sit behind the firewalls and each one will tunnel port 25 on your mx IP to the appliance. Then it will send filtered email to your mail server.

yeah, but I'll need two right?

money people won't go for that when software costs $300 lol
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,344
126
If you are using an Exchange server, I've been pretty happy with GFI. For the price, ease of use, and reliability of it, it's not bad.

Once you give the Bayesian filter time to learn, it's fairly accurate. What are your complaints with it?
 

cross6

Senior member
Jun 16, 2005
508
0
0
Originally posted by: vi_edit
If you are using an Exchange server, I've been pretty happy with GFI. For the price, ease of use, and reliability of it, it's not bad.

Once you give the Bayesian filter time to learn, it's fairly accurate. What are your complaints with it?

Letting through blacklisted emails if they are in HTML format
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
Originally posted by: cross6
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: cross6
Originally posted by: SagaLore

You want an enterprise solution, which leads me to believe that you use internal mail server(s), and your emails go through mx record(s) that has to come through a firewall at some perimeter. Right?


mx record --> two net connections --> two pix's --> two routers (HSRP group) --> mail server

You only have 1 mx record and 1 mail server, but redundant connections/hardware in between? Is that correct?

If so, then a gateway appliance is still your best bet. It can sit behind the firewalls and each one will tunnel port 25 on your mx IP to the appliance. Then it will send filtered email to your mail server.

yeah, but I'll need two right?

money people won't go for that when software costs $300 lol

No, just one.

Originally posted by: cross6
Originally posted by: vi_edit
If you are using an Exchange server, I've been pretty happy with GFI. For the price, ease of use, and reliability of it, it's not bad.

Once you give the Bayesian filter time to learn, it's fairly accurate. What are your complaints with it?

Letting through blacklisted emails if they are in HTML format

That is actually a common problem that many email filters have. They only look at the unencoded text, so my message "OMGHI2U2!!! BUY VIAGARA!", could look like in plaintext (to the filter) as "<html><orange>OM</orange><yellow>GHI2</yellow>&l
;stars>U2!</stars><moon>!! BU</moon><vector>Y VIA</vector><scalar>GARA!</scalar></html>".

It was awhile before I noticed any of the spam filtering solutions catch on. You need an html rendering engine so the filters can see what the person sees.

What dns/ip RBL's are you using now?

Btw, how many people are in your company? $300 doesn't sound right...
 

cross6

Senior member
Jun 16, 2005
508
0
0
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: cross6
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: cross6
Originally posted by: SagaLore

You want an enterprise solution, which leads me to believe that you use internal mail server(s), and your emails go through mx record(s) that has to come through a firewall at some perimeter. Right?


mx record --> two net connections --> two pix's --> two routers (HSRP group) --> mail server

You only have 1 mx record and 1 mail server, but redundant connections/hardware in between? Is that correct?

If so, then a gateway appliance is still your best bet. It can sit behind the firewalls and each one will tunnel port 25 on your mx IP to the appliance. Then it will send filtered email to your mail server.

yeah, but I'll need two right?

money people won't go for that when software costs $300 lol

No, just one.

Originally posted by: cross6
Originally posted by: vi_edit
If you are using an Exchange server, I've been pretty happy with GFI. For the price, ease of use, and reliability of it, it's not bad.

Once you give the Bayesian filter time to learn, it's fairly accurate. What are your complaints with it?

Letting through blacklisted emails if they are in HTML format

That is actually a common problem that many email filters have. They only look at the unencoded text, so my message "OMGHI2U2!!! BUY VIAGARA!", could look like in plaintext (to the filter) as "<html><orange>OM</orange><yellow>GHI2</yellow>&l
;stars>U2!</stars><moon>!! BU</moon><vector>Y VIA</vector><scalar>GARA!</scalar></html>".

It was awhile before I noticed any of the spam filtering solutions catch on. You need an html rendering engine so the filters can see what the person sees.

What dns/ip RBL's are you using now?

Btw, how many people are in your company? $300 doesn't sound right...

relays.ordb.org

sbl.spamhaus.org
 

iamwiz82

Lifer
Jan 10, 2001
30,772
13
81
The number one blacklist for my filter in terms of blocks per day is sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, followed by bl.spamcop.net. The other 7 I have configured rarely get anything that these two don't get first.

EDIT: HA! That's what Saglore's article said to use :p